- Posts: 14
× Members
Judge Jacobs and Andrews...
8 years 4 months ago #144980 by Gordon
I fear that you have misunderstood my post
You should be arguing that it is Judge Agnew's Decision that should be applied rather than Judge Jacob's one.
To answer your specific question, there is no requirement for a second person as the Going Out Activity does not consider these factors, the purpose of the journey is not considered nor are any physical issues that the claimant might have while following the route!
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic Judge Jacobs and Andrews...
SnowDragon wrote: Hi Gordon,
Are you saying that the person cannot do anything else other than navigate? What about if the person needs assistance to use the toilet while out on the journey in question, needs help with purchasing food while on the journey and the additonal person in this case also provides communication support.
Is Jacobs saying we need 2 people with this person? One who can do nothing more than navigate and another person who can attend to everything else.
It seems very absurd.
I fear that you have misunderstood my post
You should be arguing that it is Judge Agnew's Decision that should be applied rather than Judge Jacob's one.
To answer your specific question, there is no requirement for a second person as the Going Out Activity does not consider these factors, the purpose of the journey is not considered nor are any physical issues that the claimant might have while following the route!
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gordon, Gary, BIS, Catherine, Wendy, Kelly, greekqueen, peter, Katherine, Super User, jimmck, Chris