Login FormClose

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivery Fortnightly!

Over 80,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

Form Heading

Benefits and Work can reveal that not only have the DWP again refused to release a copy of ‘The uses of health and disability benefits’ report to us, but they have also declined to let the work and pensions committee see a copy under conditions of complete confidentiality. Which leads us to wonder ‘Just how damning is this report?’

Our original freedom of information request for a copy of the report was refused.

We then asked the DWP to review their decision. They have again refused to release it, claiming the report falls within an exemption which “protects the private space within which Ministers and their policy advisers can develop policies without the risk of premature disclosure”.

We have now made a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the next stage in the process.

Meanwhile, however, the work and pensions committee asked the DWP to release a copy of the report to them under ‘reading room’ conditions, so that they could have a better understanding of why they were refusing to publish it.

Reading room conditions mean that members of the committee are provided with access to a hard copy that they cannot take away with them. The chair of the work and pension committee states in his letter:

“I should note that this Committee has never breached confidentiality when the Department and its public bodies have shared material with us in the past.”

Coffey, the DWP minister responded with a terse, two paragraph reply in which she refused the request, saying:

“I do not intend to share this research with the Committee under “reading room” conditions. As you suggest, this would be an atypical arrangement, and as set out in my previous response, it is important to protect the private space within which Ministers and their policy advisers can develop policies.”

All of which leads us to wonder what on earth can be in this report that the DWP are so desperate to keep secret?

The report is not legal or specialist advice and it does not give information about the confidential inner workings of the DWP or the possible effects of a range of different policy decisions from which the minister must make a choice.

In fact, 120 claimants were interviewed for the report simply to examine “the experiences, spending decisions and spending behaviours of health and disability claimants to understand how their needs are met.”

The original bid pack stated that the successful bidder would have to create: “A final report of the research findings for publication” and “a one-page summary of the research for the DWP website”.

So, on the face of it, there is nothing in the slightest bit confidential in this report that a minister would need to keep secret from the public. On the contrary, there is a strong public interest in knowing whether the billions of pounds being spent on disability benefits is actually providing the support for vulnerable claimants that is its intended purpose.

It seems very possible that many of the claimants interviewed for the report will have talked about how hard it is to claim benefits and some may have said that the stress of claiming and maintaining a claim had affected their health.

It also seems likely that many of the claimants will have said that benefits that were supposed to help with the additional costs of disability are in fact being spent on meeting the shortfall in their housing costs and paying basic food and heating bills.

But none of this would have come as any surprise. These are all issues that have been written about and talked about many, many times in the past and the DWP must have known they would get these kind of responses when they commissioned the research.

So, is there something else in the report?

Or are the responses from the claimants so overwhelmingly negative that the DWP’s claims to be in any way meeting the needs of disabled claimants would be utterly undermined.

Clearly, we don’t know the answer. But we will keep on pushing as long and as hard as we can to get this report into the public domain.


#4 lesley 2021-12-08 17:10
Some years ago the central government tried to de-centralize Attendance Allowance
Not sure if anyone remembers this.
I do because I am 74 and still on DLA. Fortunately the whole proposal was scrapped. DLA and AA are both paid by the same part of the DWP. So I was extremely worried, thinking it's the "thin edge of wedge" and more serious and unpleasant cuts or modernizing or whatever you would call it, would take place.
I do hope that a similar plan for benefit claimants is not in the pipeline.
+2 #3 naheegan 2021-12-04 01:01
Firstly, I greatly appreciate the tireless and ceaseless efforts of Benefits and Work staff. To speak up for claimants, provide accurate information, and plough through the smokescreens that DWP creates to cover up the harm that the benefits system creates is champion.

My guess also, is that benefits are not nearly enough income to enable an above-poverty standard of living and that the majority of disabled claimants are going without on multiple fronts. And it would be an embarrassment for the government to have this widely known to the public.
Especially since they crow about 'how much you need to live on'.
Which is nowhere in the realm of reality, even more so this year now that rents, utilities and food costs have rocketed.
#2 denby 2021-12-03 19:21
Christmas parties while others including us forced to cancel Christmas for our disabled daughter last year.. And now denials they broke the rules. Bit similar really to this hidden report issue. Is it true DWP spend on admin is being cut 40%, as they are not coping now, what on earth will be the result if true??

Keep up the good work B&W we love you.
+2 #1 ThisGovernmentsGoneToFar 2021-11-30 17:01
To be honest B+W.

Nothing surprises us when regarding this Minister Therese Coffey, or even this corrupt government? I would lay my life on this that all the responses to this from the participants involved in this have spoken out what a corrupt system this is.

I could go on for ever in disgusting the wrongs of this dodgy department ?

Boris has kept that one in charge because she is harsh to claimants, I won't repeat what I really think. It's disgusting Boris as they make the rules up as they go along. It does to me seems very suspicious why they won't release this document!!!

Keep pushing for it B+W.

You need to be logged in to comment

Subscribe Now

Get Instant Access to all our guides