Appeal advice - after MR

Got my MR letter today and the original decision of 2 points still stands. When preparing for the appeal do we mention the MR or concentrate solely on the HP's assessment?

Even if there are comments made on the MR that we don't agree with? For example that we have only provided clinical evidence. Surely they realise that GP's are not willing to provide anything other that that?

Thanks,
Sarah

Further and in addition. It’s functional evidence that counts here. Further Check the qualifications of the assessor. The appeal papers will tell you their qualifications. It might be you can challenge their ability to make a functional assessment of you. This is a point of law, so if not considered by the appeal panel in their reasoning this point only can be appealed to the UT. It usually is considered in the FTT reasoning because they are used to covering every eventuality. But you never know

BIS

I am aware of the guides you provide, and I know how to submit an appeal. However the guide won't answer my question.