× Members

TRANSFER FROM IB TO ESA AND PIP CLAIM

More
9 years 4 months ago #126940 by angelcake
Replied by angelcake on topic TRANSFER FROM IB TO ESA AND PIP CLAIM
Thanks appeciate it

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 4 months ago #126954 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic TRANSFER FROM IB TO ESA AND PIP CLAIM
AC

I'm going to try and answer your points one at a time, but in a slightly different order, I hope this does not confuse you. :)

I asked for a MC in time and received a letter to confirm, 28 days is up next week.


I'm taking this as meaning that you have requested a Mandatory Reconsideration and that the DWP have confirmed that your request has been accepted.

Wondered whether to just call them today and speak based on what I’ve said here or whether I need to really go over the guide? as they can use stuff from the phone call


Calling them back will not allow you to speak to the Decision Maker today, they will receive a request for them to phone you, this may be tomorrow, it could also be next week.

Also there is no value you in you speaking to the DM unless you can make a coherent argument for your being in the Support Group (SG), if you are currently brain fogged (and I know how disabling this can be as I also have ME/CFS), you will not be able to do this. You need to be able to list your reasons and then contact the DWP for the DM to call you back.

Furthermore under opinion ‘the available evidence suggests improvement in UNLIKELY in the longer term. Long standing problems, under GP and specialist care, awaiting further investigations for CFS symptoms’
Am I missing something?? I’m just wondering why on earth I’ve been put in the WRAG group based on those documented statements?? Is this right am I missing something here?


None of these statements qualify you for the SG, ESA tests a claimants level of disability (see next point), it does not directly test whether the claimant can work and comments regarding how long you may continue to have a level of disability are only relevant to when you may be re-assessed. A statement of " improvement is unlikely in the longer term" normally results in the maximum time for a re-assessment being set, which is two years for the WRAG.

Firstly I don’t know what qualifies you for the support group is it number of points?


Entry to the SG is not points based, you must show that you meet one or more of the SG criteria.

All I can do is refer you back to the ESA Claim guides, there is a specific section that explains the qualification criteria for the SG; Three ways to get into the support group, also, for each question on the ESA50 there is a corresponding explanation of the SG criteria, where applicable (not all of the questions on the ESA50 have associated SG criteria).

It is stating that I have said that I can be ‘well’ for 3 months out of 6 – I never said I could be ‘well’ for this time. I would say in a six month period, more than three months my conditions affect my ability to cope with changes. I talked about when my condition is bad it is 4 days or more. How it is when it is not as bad. I’ve been careful to mention how I can do things sometimes.
It says on the report that the decision has to be therefore a balanced judgement


It is not entirely clear whether you discussed your condition over a period of 6 months or not, if you did not then you need to challenge this with the DM, if you did then you need to qualify it further, for example; were you drawing a comparison with a similar length period in the past to illustrate how your condition had changed? If you were trying to explain how your condition fluctuates over time, then you may have used to long a period as 6 months allows the DM to assume that there might be weeks where you are functionally OK.

As a general rule talk about how you are when you are bad and how you are when you are less worse over the period of a week if at all possible, allow the assessor and the DM to work out how you are when you are at your best.

By explaining the things you can do rather than those you cannot you have probably given the DM a far rosier picture of your limitations that you intended, as a result you are going to have to explain in far more detail than you did on the ESA50 why the SG criteria apply.

It says I have scored at least 15 points but has only listed – coping with getting about on your own 9 points awarded for going out and dealing with other people 6 points for coping with social engagement although it says I have problems the majority of the time.


The simplest approach is to see whether you can meet the SG criteria for the questions you scored points for.

The Going Out question which you say you scored 9 points for, unfortunately has no SG equivalent, so there is no value in your trying to explain in more detail any restrictions that you have in this area.

The Coping with Social Situations question can get you into the SG, but it is one of the most difficult to meet the criteria for. To be placed in the SG you need to show that

"Engagement in social contact is always precluded due to difficulty relating to others or significant distress experienced by the individual."

You may be able to argue that "always" does not mean that you can never engage in social contact, but you will need to show that is precluded for most of the time, this is significantly more than the majority of the time.

You also need to show that you suffer "significant distress" as a result of social contact, whilst it is not impossible for you to do this with ME/CFS, I think you will find it difficult and will almost certainly need the support of your Consultant to do so.

...none of the descriptors set out in schedule 3 to the ESA regulations apply. She does not have limited capability for work related activity


The SG descriptors are listed in Schedule 3 of the ESA legislation this is simply saying that you do not meet any of them.

It states earlier under ‘Substantial mental risks – that making reasonable adjustments in the workplace and by taking prescribed medication there would not be any risks etc etc.
How is this right if they are saying later that work is unlikely?


This is in relation to your qualifying for the WRAG, not the SG, as you did you don't need to worry about it.

Can you tell me about the risks to mental health, my condition has worsened with the stress and but even without that I am not ready nor do I know at this point if I will ever be ready to take any steps towards work.
Are the risks just suicide and self harm?


Again this relates to your qualifying for the WRAG, to be relevant to the SG you would need to show that these risks apply to you in the context of Work Related Activity, not work itself, this is explained in the ESA Claim guides in the section I mentioned above and is far more detailed that I can explain here.

She also documented that I WALK to my brothers takes 20minutes once a week or every two. This is incorrect on both counts as if I am well enough to go it is too far and the DRIVE is 20minutes.


If you are saying that you said "drive" rather than "walk" then you should make this clear to the DM, however, you will still need to show that you cannot for the majority of the time walk or self-propel a manual wheelchair more than 50m, or having done so, that you could not do so again within a reasonable timescale. Whether you use of even own a wheelchair is not relevant unless you can show it is unreasonable for you to use one.


To conclude, I cannot state whether you meet any of the other questions on the ESA50 and more importantly whether you meet the necessary SG criteria for them, you need to go through the Claim guides to see which you think you might meet, if you are confused about the criteria then come back to the forum and we will do our best to help.

This MR process is not the end of the road, even if you are unsuccessful at this stage you can still make an appeal to the Tribunal Service.

I hope I have covered everything :)

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: angelcake

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 4 months ago - 9 years 4 months ago #126961 by angelcake
Replied by angelcake on topic TRANSFER FROM IB TO ESA AND PIP CLAIM
Hi Gordon thanks for your help and answering all my points and questions.

Yes they have accepted that I have a MC in writing.

The phone call is for a verbal explanation of why I’ve been put in the WRAG group I’ve never had a verbal explanation and apparently I’m entitled to one – are we on the same page about the phone call?? Or are you talking about a phone call specifically about the MR or is it all the same thing?

They’ve definitely told me on numerous occasions it’s a 3hr call back for the verbal explanation. Please would you clarify?

Thanks for recognising about the brain fog and emphasising the importance of me getting my reasons sorted out and clear, it is impossible to do with Brain fog...


‘It is not entirely clear whether you discussed your condition over a period of 6 months or not, if you did not then you need to challenge this with the DM, if you did then you need to qualify it further, for example; were you drawing a comparison with a similar length period in the past to illustrate how your condition had changed? If you were trying to explain how your condition fluctuates over time, then you may have used to long a period as 6 months allows the DM to assume that there might be weeks where you are functionally OK.’

I’m not clear what I’ve done of what I need to do here’s an example:
'
'Due to my condition and symptoms I have mentioned above sometimes I am unable to cope with planned and unplanned changes. My condition can fluctuate in the day and is variable and very unpredictable from week to week. When my symptoms are severe to moderate it can be 4 days or more of the week when I cannot cope with changes. With the above conditions symptoms they can vary and fluctuate in intensity. When my symptoms are milder it can be less than 4days that changes affect my ability to cope. Also, on somedays it could be one particular condition or all my conditions that affect my ability to cope with changes. I would say in a six month period, more than three months my conditions affect my ability to cope with changes'.

It sounds to me that I’ve tried to cover it over a week period and 6mth. Is this a bad job? I really struggled as yes my condition is incredibly variable, fluctuates and is unpredictable it is very difficult to say I did the best job I could. How do you suggest I tackle things now?? and how do I explain myself from changing what I’ve already stated??


‘By explaining the things you can do rather than those you cannot you have probably given the DM a far rosier picture of your limitations that you intended’ I did that to cover myself from fraud as Ms Hurtyback has pointed out on a couple of occasions in the past. All I have said is that really when my condition is mild I can SOMETIMES do the things in question

‘as a result you are going to have to explain in far more detail than you did on the ESA50 why the SG criteria apply.’ I went into loads of detail there was about 9 types sheets of A4 – what else do you suggest I do?

I don’t feel I can give much more to this process, I’ll literally no reserves left and ruuning on empty, I need to keep it simple, otherwise it’s not going to get done. Any suggestions??


"Engagement in social contact is always precluded due to difficulty relating to others or significant distress experienced by the individual."

You may be able to argue that "always" does not mean that you can never engage in social contact, but you will need to show that is precluded for most of the time, this is significantly more than the majority of the time.’

You also need to show that you suffer "significant distress" as a result of social contact,

It does affect me in that way but only when my symptoms are severe to moderate and then I can have problems from anything to all week to more than four days – does this count as SG??

Most importantly as I’ve got my consultant appointment tomorrow and she has already supplied me with an indepth letter. I’m sure she will do me another one, she is going to ask me what sort of thing she can say now, bearing in mind she’s said a lot already.

But she has said she can only speak in general terms and can’t comment on how the specific descriptors affect me.

My G.P has also said to me she will do a letter but she needs to know what kind of things and why not qualify for support group.

I’m very time pressured for the consultant app as tomorrow and it doesn’t sound like I can be ready or able to speak to the DWP to find out why I’ve not met the support group.

It is a never ending nightmare any suggestions for my specialist tomorrow, I don’t know whether to cancel the app and get put in as an extra on clinic for next week if poss.

Also I do you think I’ve had a statement of reasons? A hand written slip says I’ve got the DM’s decision and medical report, which doesn’t sound like a SOR to me or is it??

Thank for all your help

AC
Last edit: 9 years 4 months ago by Gordon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 4 months ago #126968 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic TRANSFER FROM IB TO ESA AND PIP CLAIM
AC

With regard the call back, if they say they'll phone in three hours then that's great, I just don't believe it will happen but I am happy to be proven wrong.

As you have requested an MR then it will cover both scenarios, why they placed you in the WRAG and not the SG and you will have an opportunity to put forward your reasons for being put in the SG.

If you have discussed your condition over a period of six months then there is nothing you can do about this but provide a more detailed breakdown of how your condition affects you over a shorter period such as a week or a month.

I am afraid that there is no way to make this process simpler, it is entirely down to you to show that you meet one or more of the SG criteria, if you do not feel that you can do this, then you can let the MR process continue, it is likely that the DM, without further input from you will uphold the original Decision, you can then appeal it but you will only be deferring the work as it will still be required for the appeal!

It is not impossible that a DM will consider four days a week as meeting the standard for "always" but I think it very unlikely that they will, even if they were to, I think it would only be after your providing more input from you to this limitation.

I'm not sure I can provide more help with regard to your talking to your Consultant and GP, until you identify those Descriptors that might get you into the SG, all they can provide is generalised comments. One thing I can say is that a statement that you are unfit for work will be of no value, you are already considered as such by the DWP.

You may or may not have received a Statement of Reasons, as I explained in a previous post, the DWP only have to provide this if the information it would contain has not been supplied in another form. Now that the MR has been requested the SoR is only of informational value it does not extend the times involved in the MR process at all.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: angelcake

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 4 months ago #127161 by angelcake
Replied by angelcake on topic TRANSFER FROM IB TO ESA AND PIP CLAIM
Hi Gordon,

Sorry I’m back again but made a bit of headway, see below. However, firstly I need some advice in terms of what best to do. My MC was put in 4wks ago this coming Friday. As you will see below I’m in the middle of attempting to put my argument together. When I put in for the MC it was late on the Friday about 5pm, so they said that they wouldn't pick it up till the Monday but told me I had 28days. When I received my letter of confirmation there is no deadline date. So when do you think I will have to submit my evidence by this Thursday or Friday?

I will have to let them know that new my medical evidence GP will be delayed due to difficulty in getting an appointment so this is going to go on beyond the 28 days. Does this still mean though that my own writtenevidence still needs to be handed in the 28days or is it possible that I could have anymore time due to the difficulties I’ve had health wise in completing this?

What do you suggest I do as I doubt very much my written argument for the support group will be completed by tommorow (and possibly not friday) and I’m getting very stressed to get special delivery which in theory could be a day late... can you tell me what best to do and where I stand time wise. As far as I know I have good cause for the medical evidence but it's how they would view my submission late. If I write to them to inform the medical evidence is going to go beyond the 28days will they make allowances for my late evidence?

I’m just working through the descriptors to see whereby to see if I can argue that I should be in the support group...

With starting and finishing tasks on the decision sheet this hasn’t been mentioned as me scoring any points, however, on the medical report – it says the I frequently cannot... and the supporting medical evidence does suggest some functional disability. Nothing has been written in-depth about it, so I wonder if this is why there has been no points on the decision makers sheet. I did complain at the assessment that I felt I had not been able to fully discuss my condition and I know the examiner did not cover everything in detail. So why do you think I’ve not been given any points when it says frequently on the report? I thought that amounts to 6 points? This has happened also on the awareness of hazards – where it actually says none of the above apply – however, my GP and myself have given written evidence on this but I don’t think again it was covered in the medical and when I complained the examiner said they simply could not go through everything I’d written. So I’m wondering again if the DM has not considered my evidence and GP and has just looked at the medical report and hence scored no points.

With coping with change again something similar has happened this time on the medical report it says cannot cope with minor unplanned change such as timing of appointment...which is surely 6 points. On the med report it says adapting to change supporting med evidence but nothing has been written about it. Again I don’t think it was discussed at assessment.

Regardless of this to recap the descriptors that I have identified that might get me into the support group are: starting and completing tasks, coping with change and awareness of everyday hazards, coping with social engagement..(scored 6points already)

However, I’ve gone back over the guides and I’m confused about the criteria if I actually do qualify or not can you help please?

My initial thoughts are with the starting and completing tasks
I need to address the situation of me initially looking at a 6mth period as it has given the impression that I’m aright in 3 of the months which I’m not

‘Cannot due to impaired function... – I can say this in my bad weeks I can be affected everyday of the week, I cannot say how many weeks I maybe like this though but on my not so bad weeks I can still have problems 4 day or more.
Also when I’m doing tasks I have various problems which could count as me not being able to do them?

The issue here is what exactly does ‘Cannot’ mean in terms of does that mean absolutely NEVER or could I possibily qualify as in my bad weeks I can be affected everyday of the week??

As said earlier I don’t know what time I have for handing this in but I’m currently struggling with brain fog and my ok times to get this done are far and few between and I’ve currently got a Migraine but really time pressured.

However, I feel maybe I need to just deal with this descriptor first before I explore the others due to this.

Also, I believe that there would be a substantial risk to my mental health if it is upheld that I am required to engage in work-related activities.

It is stated in my medical report that ‘by making reasonable adjustments in the workplace and by taking the prescribed medication my conditions would not mean there would be a substantial risk to the mental or physical health of any person if they were found capable of work related activity’

So I want to disagree with this statement and subsequent decision to place me in the WRAG on the grounds that:

I’m not on medication for anxiety and depression due to the side-effects that significantly worsened my condition. Talking therapies were also ineffective.

Secondly, With my thyroid medication I’ve medical evidence already submitted that has documented the difficulty in controlling stabilising and managing my condition which subsequently my mental health is significantly effected.

Therefore if I am required to take part in any work- related activities I believe that my mental health would be at risk as my condition is not sufficiently stabilised and I have not got the support mechanisms in place in terms of effective treatment whereby my symtoms are managed and it causes me extreme distress. Therefore I would argue the above statement to be not valid in my case and there would be a substantial risk to my mental health as I know that this would my condition would deteriorate seriously by significantly worsening my anxiety and depression doing wrag activities. And subsequently I would be unable to leave the house and/or attend any work-related activities or find them very distressing.

Please can you let me know your thoughts on whether I have grounds for claiming substantial risk to mental health to qualify for the support group. I could get medical support for this.

Thanks again

AC

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 4 months ago - 9 years 4 months ago #127166 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic TRANSFER FROM IB TO ESA AND PIP CLAIM
angelcake

I am doing my best to provide you with information, but it is important that you understand that Moderators cannot give direct advice as to how a member should proceed in any given situation, only the claimant can make these decisions.

To try and answer your questions

The DM is required to give you four weeks to submit further evidence in support of your claim, could it be longer, most certainly as in many areas MR's are taking 5-8 weeks to be completed, if not longer. However, you cannot rely on there being extra time, only be thankful if there is, so I would recommend that attempt to have the information with the DWP by this Friday if at all possible and as soon after if you cannot.

You can ask the DWP for a further extension, but I am afraid they are not required to provide it, but there is of course no harm in asking.

Looking at the Descriptors you mention

Awarereness of hazards or danger

You need to show a

Reduced awareness of everyday hazards leads to a significant risk of:
(i) injury to self or others; or
(ii) damage to property or possessions,
such that they require supervision for the majority of the time to maintain safety


Can you give examples of where you have hurt yourself, how often? Do you get any supervision and most importantly, how do you manage these task if you do not?

You can only score points if the risk is caused by your not realising the danger rather than realising them but not being able to avoid them. So for example; if you know that the toast is hot and it can burn you but you still make toast then you will not score points for this.

Starting and finishing tasks

To be placed in the SG you need to show that for the majority of the time you

cannot reliably initiate or complete at least 2 sequential personal actions

This is very restrictive and you will not only need to show how often you are affected but emphasise the degree, two actions are likely to be seen as a lot less than you think they are!

You say your medical evidence says "frequently" but if this is only when you are affected then it does not meet the requirement for the majority of then time, to try and explain this; if frequently means half the time and you are affected on average four days a week, then frequently equates to only two days a week.

Secondly, you make no mention of the extent of the restriction, to score any points the restriction is two personal actions.

Coping with changes

You need to show that you

Cannot cope with any change to the extent that day to day life cannot be managed

Whilst it should be possible to still argue that the majority of the time applies, I think you need to take the phrase "any change" as being an absolute or at the very least as near to an absolute as possible. Your report says "cannot cope with minor unplanned change", I am afraid I think you will find it difficult to show that this meets the standard required.

Coping with social situations

Like "cannot" it is possible to show that "always" does not mean never, but as I explained previously this is a very high standard that needs to be met and I do not believe that you will be able to do this if you can only demonstrate that you are affected four days a week, I would expect you to need to show that you are

precluded due to difficulty relating to others or significant distress experienced by the individual.

at least six days a week and that you experience "significant distress", something that it is not clear from your previous posts is the case.

Regulation 35

It may be possible for you to show that your undertaking Work Related Activity would pose a substantial risk to your health, this Regulation applies where no other Descriptor applies.

It is important to understand that this is not work, it is limited to the activities that you might be asked to do while you are in the WRAG, so it includes your attending a Work Focussed interview, even if it is held over the phone or in your own home, you carrying out Work Related Activity such as your attending courses or preparing documentation such as a CV.

You need to identify what the danger is for a range of tasks, how you would be affected and how often, you also must specifically identify the condition that would result in this danger. Also, the risk must be identifiable now, arguing that your doing WRA would result in a worsening of your conditions such that it becomes a risk will probably be unsuccessful.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Last edit: 9 years 4 months ago by Gordon.
The following user(s) said Thank You: angelcake

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.