Feeling uneasy about support with pip application

Many thanks, I have understood you now.

One last thing, my MR decision letter is dated 15th September 2015.
From another thread I think you said that a 'month' is the number of days in the following month from the decision date. In this case I believe I would have to submit my appeal by 15th of october. However when I called pip up today they said they said it is 28 days. So my deadline is 13th of october. I requested the rep speak to a manager and he said it was indeed 28 days. Is this correct becase I think in another thread you say different?

Thanks again.

Hi. You said that with an oral hearing, if the judge expects there is a threat to ones award, they will let you know at the beginning of the hearing and you will get a chance to opt out. What if I opt for paper hearing and the judge thinks there is a threat to the award, is there anyway i will be given an indication or similar chance to opt out? Thanks

Hi. I am submitting my appeal for a paper hearing. This is because I think the tribunal will accept the evidence for me needing assistence when outside is quite strong so I need not go there.

Assuming that they agree with me, I only need to worry which Upper tribunal decision they will follow. I have copied the benefits and work submission where you highlight errors of law in the judge jacobs decision and request that they follow the Judge Agnews decision.

In order to convince them to follow latter decision, would you recommend that I also submit your document where you quote the Response document thereby trying to persuade them that the Agnews decision is the correct one as it correlates with the government guidance?

My appeal is 6 pages and I am worried if adding more pages will put the judge off. Alternatively would you suggest I modify the appeal and references to the excerpts from the Response document? Or would you recommend not sending or discussing those quotes at all and just letting the judges decide based on their reading of the two cases? Your submissions include the conflicting decisions, quotes from the response document and arguing how cognition can still be taken into consideration for mental health claimants. All of this is relevant to my appeal however I'm just wondering you recommend submitting all of this information because it might seem a bit long winded and put the judge off? Please advise.

Thanks