I am a signed up member of B & W and have downloaded nearly all of the guides.
Having done so, I am at the moment stuck but a little bit wiser,
when it comes to completing my MR.
One thing can't understand is how for example, can I have a decision changed on
reliability. Let me give you an example.
On one descriptor X had been marked by the HP as being able to cook a meal
X put down in his form that his family cook for him and due to
his mobility and mental health (Walking aid, Osteoathritis, can't reach etc
and effects of medication where he loses track due to anti-psychotic medication)
can not cook for himself!
How can you argue without considering the HP's opinion, or observations?
Don’t get me wrong I am not being defeatist but what’s the point of an MR,
when it will be their word against yours?
Best Wishes - Paul
