- Posts: 30
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP, UC and DLA Queries and Results
- Risk of repetitiveness in descriptors.
× Members
Risk of repetitiveness in descriptors.
- PBR Street Gang
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
5 years 2 months ago #244706 by PBR Street Gang
Risk of repetitiveness in descriptors. was created by PBR Street Gang
Hi All
Coming down to the final hurdle of the MR..I hope.
When challenging a DM's decision and basically re-submitting you descriptors, is it advisable to
keep saying in every descriptor 'due to unsteadiness I can't walk..' for lets say preparing food,
bathing etc.. Or is it better (again as an example) to just mention 'unsteadiness I can't walk' in
the descriptor for 'moving around' and then just say 'X can't bathe/prepare food
because of difficulties in moving around'
I hope you get the drift, but if you don't please just ask. As ever many thanks in advance - Paul.
Coming down to the final hurdle of the MR..I hope.
When challenging a DM's decision and basically re-submitting you descriptors, is it advisable to
keep saying in every descriptor 'due to unsteadiness I can't walk..' for lets say preparing food,
bathing etc.. Or is it better (again as an example) to just mention 'unsteadiness I can't walk' in
the descriptor for 'moving around' and then just say 'X can't bathe/prepare food
because of difficulties in moving around'
I hope you get the drift, but if you don't please just ask. As ever many thanks in advance - Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BIS
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 9011
5 years 2 months ago #244708 by BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by BIS on topic Risk of repetitiveness in descriptors.
Hi Paul
Some people may disagree and this is a personal view, but I would always keep repeating any phrases that are necessary. The person who is reading knows nothing, about you, so you need to state it - never assume they will make the connection that if you have balance issues they may apply to every activity.
BIS
Some people may disagree and this is a personal view, but I would always keep repeating any phrases that are necessary. The person who is reading knows nothing, about you, so you need to state it - never assume they will make the connection that if you have balance issues they may apply to every activity.
BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: PBR Street Gang
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Becky
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 131
5 years 2 months ago #244713 by Becky
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Becky on topic Risk of repetitiveness in descriptors.
I found it is better to repeat yourself and drum it into their(DWP) heads rather than rely on them understanding. You live with your condition constantly...the decision maker does not.
I heard the phrase 'you have to spoon feed it to them'....thats probably not far off.
I heard the phrase 'you have to spoon feed it to them'....thats probably not far off.
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: PBR Street Gang
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PBR Street Gang
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 30
5 years 2 months ago #244716 by PBR Street Gang
Replied by PBR Street Gang on topic Risk of repetitiveness in descriptors.
Thanks BIS.. before I go any further with this MR, the most important question didn't crops my mind till now, and hopefully Gary can pipe in as well..
In your experience why do MR's have such a high rejection rate?
As always, thanks BIS.
In your experience why do MR's have such a high rejection rate?
As always, thanks BIS.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bud
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 423
5 years 2 months ago #244719 by Bud
Replied by Bud on topic Risk of repetitiveness in descriptors.
Hi Paul
I kept repeating everything in detail, like BIS said you treat it like they know absolutely nothing about the subject. As the saying goes Tell them what you’re going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you told them.
I kept repeating everything in detail, like BIS said you treat it like they know absolutely nothing about the subject. As the saying goes Tell them what you’re going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you told them.
The following user(s) said Thank You: PBR Street Gang
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gary
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 8436
5 years 2 months ago #244724 by Gary
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gary on topic Risk of repetitiveness in descriptors.
Hi PBR Street Gang
That is the million dollar question, only 10% of MR are successful, 75% of appeals are successful, I believe I read somewhere that only 2% of claimants appeal their decision!!
Gordon may be able to correct me on the facts.
Gary
That is the million dollar question, only 10% of MR are successful, 75% of appeals are successful, I believe I read somewhere that only 2% of claimants appeal their decision!!
Gordon may be able to correct me on the facts.
Gary
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: PBR Street Gang
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gordon, Gary, BIS, Catherine, Wendy, Kelly, greekqueen, peter, Katherine, Super User, Chris, David