PIP Appeal. Need for large handled cutlery denied because I can use walking stic

Hi BenMM

The assessor has made an unsupported causal inference — that ability in one task (using a walking stick) demonstrates ability in a functionally different task (using standard cutlery). This is not a valid comparison

Key Arguments
1. A walking stick requires a fundamentally different grip
Using a walking stick involves a large-diameter, cylindrical grip with a downward pressing motion, distributing weight through the palm and wrist. Using standard cutlery requires a precision pinch grip — fine motor control using the fingertips, sustained over repeated movements. These are biomechanically distinct actions. Competence in one does not imply competence in the other.

2. The stick assists you — it doesn't demonstrate strength
A walking stick is a compensatory aid and was given to you because you cannot manage without it. Using it actually demonstrates your reduced functional capacity, not enhanced ability. By the assessor's logic, needing a walking stick at all should be evidence of limitation, not capability.

3. Pain and muscle spasms are contextual and variable
Your difficulties with cutlery may relate to:

Pain on precision grip (e.g. from arthritis, fibromyalgia, nerve damage - I only givew examples - you didn't actually say what it is), which is not engaged when using a stick
Muscle spasms that may be triggered by specific movements, durations, or angles — none of which are shared between the two tasks
Fatigue — using a stick for mobility may actually worsen hand fatigue by the time the person sits to eat

4. The frequency and duration of use differ significantly
A walking stick may be used in short bursts with rests. Eating requires sustained fine motor activity — repeatedly gripping, lifting, cutting, and manoeuvring — over a meal. The endurance demands are entirely different.

5. Medical evidence should override functional assumption
You have a diagnosis. The medical basis for needing adapted equipment should be taken from clinical evidence, not inferred from an unrelated assumption on the part of the assessor. (especially if this was a phone or paper-based assessment and they never saw you)

I know it sounds a bit wordy, but I hope you get what I'm saying.

BIS