We are going to Tribunal (again) to dispute the fact that my daughter (aged 16, who has severe learning difficulties and severe developmental delays) has been awarded the lower rate of mobility. They have said that this is because she does not have a severe mental impairment as she consciously decides to run out into the road/take flight, for example, when she hears a loud noise/gets distracted (all just a couple of examples). She has no sense of danger and does not understand the world around her. My contention is that these are unconscious 'decisions'. they are not deliberated on in any way, just immediate reactions. How do I prove this? Any help would be really appreciated. We have arranged for an ed psych report.