Login FormClose

Free, fortnightly PIP, ESA and UC Updates

Our fortnightly bulletin, with over 80,000 subscribers, is the UK's leading source of benefits news. Find out what's changing, how it affects you and how to prepare. Our mailing list is securely managed by icontact in the US.

Welcome, Guest
Username: Password:
Remember me
Members
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: Upper Tribunal Appeal on PIp

Upper Tribunal Appeal 1 month 5 days ago #238806

I am representing a client with mental health issues who has been granted an Upper Tribunal appeal, against a decision by a First Tier Tribunal.
Our grounds for appeal are that he was unrepresented at the original appeal and felt that his evidence was ignored, which prevented him from being able to present his case properly.

Any advice??

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Upper Tribunal Appeal 1 month 5 days ago #238817

C

We are extremely limited in the advice that we can give in regard to an appeal to the UTT, it requires us to have knowledge of the Statement of Reasons and all of the papers submitted to the hearing, which of course we do not.

You say that a UTT appeal has been granted, if this correct then you have already overcome the most important issue.

Not having representation is unlikely to be a winning argument unless you can show that this seriously disadvantaged the claimant, that the panel was aware of this and that they failed to offer any remedy such as adjourning the hearing for the claimant to seek advice.

For evidence to be ignored, you will need to show that it was relevant to the appeal and that the panel have offered no explanation as to why they ignored it, the SoR will be the vehicle to do this.

Gordon
The following user(s) said Thank You: Chris Jones

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Upper Tribunal Appeal on PIp 3 weeks 4 days ago #239423

Just to let you know:
We have now been given permission by the Upper Tribunal to continue with the appeal on the grounds that the First Tier Tribunal gave inadequate reasons for their decision on "engaging with other people" (9 b,c,d) in the light of the evidence provided. In particular, they quoted from SSWP v MM (2019) UKSC34. They also questioned the decision over mobility 1(e).

On we go!!
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gordon

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Moderators: GordonGaryBIS