Ok so you get a TRUE report on your condition and awarded correctly for a duration of say 3 years, But, after 2 years you have to go through the process again and they find you 'fit' as a fiddle ( in their eyes!) and you have your original award quashed! Given that the original award is for 3 years because the given evidence is read as true with medical evidence along with their reports, Is their new decision an admission that they made a mistake at the first interview given that your ailment is life long and very unlikely to change!
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.
