After just a week, Labour’s Keep Britain Working plan for the employment of disabled people  is already in tatters, condemned by disability charities and trades unions, whilst the unemployment rate hits a four-year high.

The “Keep Britain Working Review” led by former John Lewis boss Sir Charlie Mayfield, was a major pillar of the Pathways To Work Green Paper

It’s aim is to “focus on what employers and government can do to increase the recruitment, retention and return to work of disabled people and people with long-term health conditions.”

The report was released last week, with the government announcing that it will work with 60 “Vanguard” employers over the next three years to create a “healthy working lifecycle” to reduce sickness absence, improve return-to-work rates, and increase disability employment rates. The government will work towards developing the programme into a voluntary certified standard by 2029. 

Amongst the Vanguard employers, many claimants will be unimpressed to see the names of:

  • Capita
  • Maximus
  • Unum

These are all companies that are now, or have in the past, been heavily involved in assessing the fitness for work of claimants on behalf of the DWP.

The report was quickly condemned by Disability Rights UK who argued:

“Yet another government-commissioned report blames Disabled people for not working. Mayfield's report has a focus on "fixing Disabled people", but you can tell he wasn't listening to our community because it's so rife with medical model-focused language . . .

“The report comes at a time when the government is cutting schemes like Access to Work, which we know support us into the workplace . . .

“This review fails to unpick just how broken our economy is. Just 2.5% of those off work as long-term sick move into work every year, and they are predominantly in jobs that are poorly paid, strenuous and insecure, such as couriers, domestic cleaners, bar staff, coffee shop staff, security guards, warehouse operatives and farm labourers. None of these jobs are the ones the government is shouting about in its growth strategy - yet, in towns and cities across the country, especially in deindustrialised areas, they are all that exist.”

And the PCS union, whose members work in Jobcentres but who were not consulted at any time by Mayfield, was equally damning:

“The report advocates handing over significant powers to employers, written entirely from an employers' perspective it pays no regard to how pressures of work can contribute to ill health; no mention of workplace stress, insecure work, or employers paying such poverty pay that workers are reliant on benefit payments.

“The report further fails to address critical factors such as NHS waiting lists for physical and mental health conditions, the high levels of poor quality and overcrowded housing, and actual levels of poverty across society.”

But perhaps most disastrously of all, todays unemployment figures, as reported by the Guardian, have reached 5% - their highest level in four years.

So, far from increasing the “recruitment, retention and return to work of disabled people”, Labour is failing spectacularly to keep Britain working in any way at all. 

In reality, the “Keep Britain Working” scheme is already well on the way to being another tick-box, voluntary programme, like Disability Confident.  It will make employers look good, whilst doing absolutely nothing to change the reality for disabled people hoping to move into, or stay in,  work.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    The author of the Keep Britain Working Review has said hating your boss is not a mental health condition and that ill and disabled people not working are failing to take personal responsibility. So it is easy to see why he was picked to do a independent impartial review. And no surprise it blames rising numbers of people claiming mental health conditions and the welfare state providing perverse incentives to not take personal responsibility.

    And no surprise that the former CEO wants a employer led system where the employer and health professionals work together with the ill and disabled to get them back to work. As who doesn't want to be managed by their boss when they are off work due to their health. And who doesn't want their boss knowing their private medical information and leading the effort with their doctor to get them back to work. And who doesn't want a sickness benefit and disability welfare system that is employer led not doctor and DWP led. As boss know best. Don't forget to doff your cap and mind your yes sir's no sir's. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    "But perhaps most disastrously of all, todays unemployment figures, as reported by the Guardian, have reached 5% - their highest level in four years.

    So, far from increasing the “recruitment, retention and return to work of disabled people”, Labour is failing spectacularly to keep Britain working in any way at all."

    5% unemployment rate is actually very low and believed to be ideal. As low as possible without being detrimental to the UK economy.

    The ‘non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment’ (NAIRU) for the UK is generally taken to be 5%. Unemployment below this rate causes inflation as employers compete to recruit and retain staff, and hinders economic growth as employers struggle to recruit and retain staff.

    The natural rate of unemployment for the UK is also generally taken to be 5%. That is unemployment due to a mismatch between those looking for the work and the skills required by employers and pay offered by employers. People not taking jobs because either they do not have the required skills or the pay is too low.

    Unemployment below 5% means the government needs to increase the number of available workers. Usually through immigration. Or these days it seems by redefining people assessd as incapable of any paid employment as work capable.

    A unemployment rate of 5% or higher means we already have enough unemployed workers available.

    It is good news it reduces the economic argument for redefining people deemed incapable of working as work capable. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @John @John Your financial analysis may be correct, I’m not qualified to judge. But politically it’s very wide of the mark.

      Labour have made getting sick and disabled claimants off benefits and into work a central plank of their plan to boost growth and improve the country’s finances by cutting the benefits bill. They intend to invest many hundreds of millions in doing so and they cannot afford to be seen to fail, particularly given the growing media hate campaign against disabled claimants.

      Schemes to support claimants back into work will quickly have sanctions attached to them if they are seen to be failing. It will be disabled claimants who will get the blame for not finding work, even if there are no vacancies.

      So, a rising unemployment rate is definitely not good news for disabled claimants, particularly those with LCW rather than LCWRA.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact