- Posts: 9
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP, UC and DLA Queries and Results
- Musculoskeletal assessments relevance to ME/CFS
Musculoskeletal assessments relevance to ME/CFS
- Marah
- Topic Author
- Offline
I've been given standard rate mobility and care PIP. I'm trying to appeal the mobility component because I disagree with the evidence used. The DWP state a musculoskeletal assessment in my previous PIP medical (2013) isn't consistent withbmy claimed difficulty below 20 metres. Basically i moved my joints and stood/sat, so I don't see how this can be all that relevant to ME/CFS fluctuations, and totally unable to reflect the post exertions malaise of CFS.
I wondered has anyone else got experience of challenging this particular type of evidence. Clearly it can't reflect repeat/reliable/safe etc.
Many thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- slugsta
- Offline
- Posts: 9439
Welcome to Benefits and Work
I'm sorry the PIP decision was not in your favour

PIP help for claimants
The guide also explains the Mandatory Reconsideration process, should you decide to go down that route.
You might wish to bookmark/favourite this on your web browser now so that you can find it easily in future. This will allow you to return with further questions/comments about your PIP claim without having to start a new topic each time. It helps us enormously when everything relating to the same claim is kept in one place - and I hope you will find it useful too

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marah
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 9
I searched the site and reread the PIP guide this evening, but thanks for the suggestion, it never hurts to re-read does it.
I guess I'll just have to reiterate the point in my submission. I've already done mandatory re consideration, this is where they came back mentioning the musculoskeletal assessment.
Lo-o-ots of errors in both medicals 2013 & 2016.
Just worried about having care reduced as a result of appealing I guess. also the DWP regs seem to say that people who can mobilise in their home aren't likely to get higher rate even if they can't mobilise outside, so not sure if appealing is worth my while!
All so confusingbut, even if don't appeal I'll have to do something to correct the errors they have made I guess or it'll crop up every time ideal with them!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- slugsta
- Offline
- Posts: 9439
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marah
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 9
Thanks for your help.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Rowena
- Offline
- Posts: 22


Marah wrote: Hello and thanks for replying.
I searched the site and reread the PIP guide this evening, but thanks for the suggestion, it never hurts to re-read does it.
I guess I'll just have to reiterate the point in my submission. I've already done mandatory re consideration, this is where they came back mentioning the musculoskeletal assessment.
Lo-o-ots of errors in both medicals 2013 & 2016.
Just worried about having care reduced as a result of appealing I guess. also the DWP regs seem to say that people who can mobilise in their home aren't likely to get higher rate even if they can't mobilise outside, so not sure if appealing is worth my while!
All so confusingbut, even if don't appeal I'll have to do something to correct the errors they have made I guess or it'll crop up every time ideal with them!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.