- Posts: 37
× Members
DLA to PIP....... Disaster!
- Cazza
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
8 years 5 months ago #177844 by Cazza
Replied by Cazza on topic DLA to PIP....... Disaster!
Hi, We have received a letter this morning addressed to my husband saying his carer allowance will be stopped in 2 weeks. The letter was dated the same day my letter was about my pip decision and it is the same date as my dla is due to stop.
Will this be because he is named as my carer as we have never claimed any other carer allowance!
I am presuming this will be the carer allowance I had with my DLA
Thank you
Cazza
Will this be because he is named as my carer as we have never claimed any other carer allowance!
I am presuming this will be the carer allowance I had with my DLA
Thank you
Cazza
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51284
8 years 5 months ago #177845 by Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic DLA to PIP....... Disaster!
Cazza
Yes this is the case, although it was not your CA, you are the caree and your husband is the carer and it was him who received the CA.
Gordon
Yes this is the case, although it was not your CA, you are the caree and your husband is the carer and it was him who received the CA.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Cazza
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cazza
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 37
8 years 5 months ago #178070 by Cazza
Replied by Cazza on topic DLA to PIP....... Disaster!
Hi, I do not know if it is right to put this message on the forum as I have included a lot of detail. I don't mind if you don't, I just really need some help and guidance with this as I am struggling to read it let alone put the MR together.
I received my assessors report on Saturday. There are so many inaccuracies I have really struggled trying to work through all this and still am..
I don't want to call them to request the MR until I have some information together about the report as know I would not be able remember it all when they call me. My deadline is 23rd Dec I feel I need some info in front of me when they call especially about the inaccuracies. I have set myself a deadline for this Friday the 15th for completing the info and calling them. I could then post my response first class to be signed for on Monday 16th Jan which will still get to them to them before the 23rd. Would this be acceptable to them as I do not want to miss the deadline?
The evidence considered is about half of what I had submitted and there is no mention of any of them in the report anywhere. Do I give them a list of all the missing evididence? I did put a information sheet in listing all the additional info and other important info I had enclosed so I wondered if I should send that to them so they can see exactly what info I did send?
Do I give a detailed response to every inadequacy, there are so many of them but they need to be aware of.
Are there any guidelines or suggestions about how long my response should be re the MR? Here are some of he problems I am have to try and sort out.
The evidence considered is not accurate, so much info has not been noted.
The history of conditions is inaccurate, only a few listed.
The medication is inaccurate, they have not all been listed.
The treatments have not even been mentioned.
Social and occupational history is not accurate, some important info is wrong and most of the dates are wrong
The functional history contains inaccuracies.
It states here again about me navigating around the centre !independently" I cannot work this one out and I will be asking for an explanation into this too as this will have put huge doubt into my report.
There is no mention of the GP care plan.
I presume the decision makers response is based on the assessors report and his comments were extremely brief. I wonder if this is because he has read such a negative and incomplete report and had not read or seen any of the info which has not been commented on I the HP report.
I think the whole report has been based on me not receiving any specialist medical input, and being on first line medication. This has been noted on 8 pages out of 12 in the descriptor section. They do have a letter from the last pain specialist which explains everything in detail he clearly states the pain would never go away and was common after such surgery and I would have it for life.This has only been listed as evidence and has not been mentioned anywhere else in the HP report, along with my GP letter. They were not mentioned at the assessment either. How do I deal with this one? surely they must have to take into consideration that sometimes people cannot be helped and have to take different meds due to reactions to specialist medication.
The letter from the Pain Specialist also states all the specialist medication I was tried on but could not tolerate along with a few more.
I do not visit my GP with the problems which I have been left with as there is nothing they can do for me. The last pain specialist input was from 2007 which clearly states the problems I have with pain and my right leg. It also states he cannot do anything else to help me and he discharged me back into the care of my GP. They state the medication I use is not appropriate for the pain I report on but it is the only pain relief I can tolerate and I use this along with pain patches and a tens machine and rest. I have explained all this to them and told them the pain never goes away and the medication just takes the edge off it.
This is all taking is toll on my health I can understand why people give up and walk away defeated, too much stress.
Thank you
Cazza
I received my assessors report on Saturday. There are so many inaccuracies I have really struggled trying to work through all this and still am..
I don't want to call them to request the MR until I have some information together about the report as know I would not be able remember it all when they call me. My deadline is 23rd Dec I feel I need some info in front of me when they call especially about the inaccuracies. I have set myself a deadline for this Friday the 15th for completing the info and calling them. I could then post my response first class to be signed for on Monday 16th Jan which will still get to them to them before the 23rd. Would this be acceptable to them as I do not want to miss the deadline?
The evidence considered is about half of what I had submitted and there is no mention of any of them in the report anywhere. Do I give them a list of all the missing evididence? I did put a information sheet in listing all the additional info and other important info I had enclosed so I wondered if I should send that to them so they can see exactly what info I did send?
Do I give a detailed response to every inadequacy, there are so many of them but they need to be aware of.
Are there any guidelines or suggestions about how long my response should be re the MR? Here are some of he problems I am have to try and sort out.
The evidence considered is not accurate, so much info has not been noted.
The history of conditions is inaccurate, only a few listed.
The medication is inaccurate, they have not all been listed.
The treatments have not even been mentioned.
Social and occupational history is not accurate, some important info is wrong and most of the dates are wrong
The functional history contains inaccuracies.
It states here again about me navigating around the centre !independently" I cannot work this one out and I will be asking for an explanation into this too as this will have put huge doubt into my report.
There is no mention of the GP care plan.
I presume the decision makers response is based on the assessors report and his comments were extremely brief. I wonder if this is because he has read such a negative and incomplete report and had not read or seen any of the info which has not been commented on I the HP report.
I think the whole report has been based on me not receiving any specialist medical input, and being on first line medication. This has been noted on 8 pages out of 12 in the descriptor section. They do have a letter from the last pain specialist which explains everything in detail he clearly states the pain would never go away and was common after such surgery and I would have it for life.This has only been listed as evidence and has not been mentioned anywhere else in the HP report, along with my GP letter. They were not mentioned at the assessment either. How do I deal with this one? surely they must have to take into consideration that sometimes people cannot be helped and have to take different meds due to reactions to specialist medication.
The letter from the Pain Specialist also states all the specialist medication I was tried on but could not tolerate along with a few more.
I do not visit my GP with the problems which I have been left with as there is nothing they can do for me. The last pain specialist input was from 2007 which clearly states the problems I have with pain and my right leg. It also states he cannot do anything else to help me and he discharged me back into the care of my GP. They state the medication I use is not appropriate for the pain I report on but it is the only pain relief I can tolerate and I use this along with pain patches and a tens machine and rest. I have explained all this to them and told them the pain never goes away and the medication just takes the edge off it.
This is all taking is toll on my health I can understand why people give up and walk away defeated, too much stress.
Thank you
Cazza
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51284
8 years 5 months ago #178142 by Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic DLA to PIP....... Disaster!
Cazza
Your MR request needs to explain how you meet the PIP criteria to score points so deal with those issue that directly relate to your doing this and ignore the rest.
I would recommend that you go through your PIP2, the PIP Claim guide and the assessment report to make sure that you have showed that you meet the Descriptors.
Remember to include the use of "reliably" and "on the majority of days" as relevant.
Treat the Descriptors as they are written and show that your limitations meet them rather than trying to move the Descriptors to your conditions.
Try and use the same language as the Descriptors in your reply, where applicable.
It's up to you how much information you provide but do try and be brief if you can without sacrificing the content. Revision rates at MR are very low, so you might want to think about going to appeal in preference and supplying only a basic explanation of your issues at the MR.
There are example responses in the PIP section.
Gordon
Your MR request needs to explain how you meet the PIP criteria to score points so deal with those issue that directly relate to your doing this and ignore the rest.
I would recommend that you go through your PIP2, the PIP Claim guide and the assessment report to make sure that you have showed that you meet the Descriptors.
Remember to include the use of "reliably" and "on the majority of days" as relevant.
Treat the Descriptors as they are written and show that your limitations meet them rather than trying to move the Descriptors to your conditions.
Try and use the same language as the Descriptors in your reply, where applicable.
It's up to you how much information you provide but do try and be brief if you can without sacrificing the content. Revision rates at MR are very low, so you might want to think about going to appeal in preference and supplying only a basic explanation of your issues at the MR.
There are example responses in the PIP section.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Cazza
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cazza
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 37
8 years 5 months ago #178162 by Cazza
Replied by Cazza on topic DLA to PIP....... Disaster!
Which one is the PIP claim guide TY
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51284
8 years 5 months ago #178179 by Gordon
It's the one on the Guide to PIP claims and reviews link.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic DLA to PIP....... Disaster!
Cazza wrote: Which one is the PIP claim guide TY
It's the one on the Guide to PIP claims and reviews link.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Cazza
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gordon, latetrain, BIS, Catherine, Wendy, Kelly, greekqueen, peter, Katherine, Super User, Chris, David