We are currently under MR and after looking at the evidence we sent on the original AR1 we noticed that the use of a reaching stick to help pick up objects wasn't mentioned although is mentioned in previous AR1's . This as far as we can remember it wasnt mentioned in the F2F although the assesor was sat right next to it! Would this be acceptable 'further evidence' for the MR or wait untill the appeal it self should it have to progress to that?
There is absolutely no value in holding evidence or testimony back from the MR if you are hoping to overturn the Decision at this stage of the process.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
