- Posts: 45
× Members
ESA review
- Patsy19
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
5 years 3 months ago #224018 by Patsy19
ESA review was created by Patsy19
I recently had a f2f review assessment for ESA and have obtained a copy of the medical report esa85. It does not look like the previous examples I have seen. It does not have any tick boxes for recommended review timescales. I am currently in the support group. The assessor has advised I meet the criteria for LCW and LCWRA and evidence suggests review in the medium term. Do you know what this timescale means in months or years and have you heard of this new style report? Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51071
5 years 3 months ago #224024 by Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic ESA review
Lady P
In the medium term means 18 months or more likely 24.
Gordon
In the medium term means 18 months or more likely 24.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Patsy19
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 45
5 years 3 months ago #224031 by Patsy19
Replied by Patsy19 on topic ESA review
Thanks Gordon. Have you heard of the esa85 not having the tick boxes for eg. 12 months, 18 months. As I said previously mine didn't have these on and suggests review in medium term, does this mean the decision maker will decide the review date now?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51071
5 years 3 months ago #224034 by Gordon
It's actually not that unusual to see "medium" and "longer" term in the report.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic ESA review
Lady P wrote: Thanks Gordon. Have you heard of the esa85 not having the tick boxes for eg. 12 months, 18 months. As I said previously mine didn't have these on and suggests review in medium term, does this mean the decision maker will decide the review date now?
It's actually not that unusual to see "medium" and "longer" term in the report.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Patsy19
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 45
5 years 3 months ago #224037 by Patsy19
Replied by Patsy19 on topic ESA review
Thanks Gordon, but the example esa85 in the wca handbook shows tickboxes for 18 months etc, and mine does not. Will the decision maker decide the review date now?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 51071
5 years 3 months ago #224038 by Gordon
All I can say is that we have always seen these terms used.
The Decision Maker always decides when the next assessment will be scheduled for.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by Gordon on topic ESA review
Lady P wrote: Thanks Gordon, but the example esa85 in the wca handbook shows tickboxes for 18 months etc, and mine does not. Will the decision maker decide the review date now?
All I can say is that we have always seen these terms used.
The Decision Maker always decides when the next assessment will be scheduled for.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gordon, Gary, BIS, Catherine, Wendy, Kelly, greekqueen, peter, Katherine, Super User, jimmck, Chris