× Members

Going Out descriptor question

More
5 years 3 months ago #242713 by Gary
Replied by Gary on topic Going Out descriptor question
Hi RJ

I would not tick a box if he does not fit with the description but write next to it, see below or page xxx.

This is always a difficult area for claimants to explain, we often use terminology that makes sense to us; "good, bad, average" but has a totally different meaning to those assessing us.

I would start by using different terminology, for example; "at his worst, on average, at best" and then for each of these explain how long he is affected in this way, don't use percentages rather days, weeks. etc., the legal test is the majority of days. then how he is affected. It may be that even at his best he cannot complete an activity.

Remember, he must be able to complete the activities "reliably".

Don't assume that those looking at his claim will make the connections that he would expect, if he cannot do something explain why in detail and if the same problem affects his ability to complete multiple activities then explain it for each.

If he can't do an activity explain why, so why is he unable to cook? Break it down into the components, so preparing the ingredients versus cooking them, selecting the ingredients versus cutting and chopping. You need to explain why suitable aids will not help him complete the activity and why assistance or supervision also will not help.

Don't forget to look at our guides: www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/help-for-claimants/pip

Gary

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: beccajayne

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 3 months ago #242730 by beccajayne
Replied by beccajayne on topic Going Out descriptor question
Thanks Gary

We are looking at the Going Out issue again.

He certainly cannot plan and follow the route of a journey unaided reliably.

He does need support and prompting to be able to undertake journeys, but not all journeys, only unfamiliar ones where there's a likelihood of getting lost

He usually cannot plan the route of a journey (but familiar journeys he already knows the route, he might get disorientated at times but he doesn't have to plan the route because he knows the route. He cannot plan the route of an unfamiliar journey and I wonder if that is what this point is referring to? For reasons of spatial difficulties and inability to concentrate or focus or understand maps, or use a computer to look up train or bus times and an almost total avoidance of public transport anyway unless he's with someone, due to hearing impairment and feelings of anxiety and paranoia, general adhd issues with reading or understanding anything in map or written form. The only way he would 'plan' a journey is to ask someone if lost and then he would struggle to process what they are saying, he says they all speak too fast, he would struggle to hear and struggle to remember what they've said. On the occasions he's got lost he becomes overwhelmed, frantically asking lots of different people, unable to listen to their answers, he starts racing around, with the adhd he's incredibly frustrated if he cannot find what he wants immediately anyway and there's a tendency to expect things to be much simpler than they are so he gets very irate with everyone for not giving him a simple answer like 'turn right and you're there.' The result is racing around, getting very upset, maybe phoning friends in a terrible state saying he's suicidal. Obviously something inside him is stronger than all that and he's always eventually listened to someone on the phone, calmed down, and soon found a way, but he 'catastrophises' very quickly and hasn't got the spatial ability or memory to have an easy journey)

Cannot plan the route of an unfamiliar journey, etc. (for all the things said above, he cannot reliably do this and almost always doesn't undertake such journeys without someone going with him and certainly cannot plan them)

Cannot undertake any journey because it would cause overwhelming psychological distress (this is hard because he avoids many unfamiliar journeys or finds a way to have someone with him and someone plan it, but to say he cannot undertake any is not true. He has a lot of 'fight' in him and wants to be ok and wants to do things, so if he's got an interview or something he will attempt to do the journey alone if no one can help, but reliably that will lead to lateness, arriving at the interview in a very upset state, he's very honest with people so he tends to win them over on a personal level and they like him, but he won't get the position he wanted because of showing signs of not coping and arriving in a state and usually late after having been lost. And he will give them a long story about the whole thing even though its not appropriate. The overwhelming psychological distress bit sticks with me because that happens on the few occasions that he's attempted an unfamiliar journey, BUT, wording 'cannot undertake any journey', even if I think of 'reliably' is not true, because he can and does do familiar journeys)

Cannot follow the route of a familiar journey (He can follow the route of familiar journeys, say to his GP, the shops, etc but some familiar journeys he will still get in a state and get lost, but I think probably he won't qualify on this one)

Just wondering which one others think might apply to him, on the basis of this, I am finding this one hard and he is very anxious about having pip anyway, for a number of reasons and going through this form with him is very difficult.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 3 months ago #242733 by Gary
Replied by Gary on topic Going Out descriptor question
Hi RJ

Be aware there is going to be an issue over driving.

There are two distinct issues with a claimant driving, one that is reasonable and one that is less so.
First, the DWP will argue that someone who drives has good cognitive ability as the process of driving requires the driver to be aware of what is going on around them, to be able to pre-empt situations that they are approaching and to be able to manage the operation of the vehicle.They will also argue that it shows good navigation skills and an ability to plan a route, however, claimants might be able to argue that if only one journey is undertaken and the claimant had to be shown that route, that they are in fact not able to plan or navigate a route, but I think there is little flexibility in this argument.
Secondly, the DWP view driving as a physical activity, for example holding the wheel requires a level of dexterity, strength and endurance in their hands, arms and shoulders, They also believe that the operation of the pedals is akin to walking and so someone who can drive can also walk. I (for what it is worth as I don't do assessments) think that this argument is very weak, however, most people drive a car to go somewhere and having arrived at that place they may then need to then walk to complete their journey, unless of course they use a wheelchair.

The Going Out activity looks at three things.

Planning a route - this is primarily a cognitive or sensory (e.g. blindness) activity. You are being asked about the problems you would have with working out how to get from one place to another, you do not need to be able to follow the route that you are planning.

Undertaking a Journey - this is to do with mental health issues such as agoraphobia and social anxiety and is concerned with you leaving the house to go somewhere, they will be interested in the things that stops him doing this. You need to show that he would suffer "overwhelming psychological distress" to meet the criteria.

Following a route - This activity about the problems you would have navigating a route. So are there problems; cognitive, sensory or mental health issues that would prevent him from doing this? This is different from undertaking a journey, in fact, if you cannot undertake a journey then you will not score points for following one and vice versa.

Gary

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: beccajayne

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 3 months ago #242765 by beccajayne
Replied by beccajayne on topic Going Out descriptor question
Thanks Gary.

For anyone reading this (don't want you to be burdened with the question Gary, lol), do we have any examples of roughly how long 50 metres is, then 20 metres? Like in car or bus lengths?

Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 3 months ago #242773 by BIS
Replied by BIS on topic Going Out descriptor question
Hi RebeccaJayne

20 metres is equivalent to the length of 4 or 5 family cars

50 metres is equivalent to 5 city buses.

BIS

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid