Could it be argued that a muskoskelal examination is not accurate, because the claimant did not take off his thick long sleeve coat. And one final thing, if the HP claims a prescription was handed over to her but there is no form signed by the claimant in the PA4 should that be mentioned in the MR.
You are free to argue whatever you want. The issue will be is what exactly was the assessor trying to assess and could it be reasonably done with someone having their coat on. There's things they could judge which I'm sure they would argue (and win) that having a coat on makes no difference.
It's up to you whether you want to mention about the prescription. Argue about things that will earn a claimant more points. Everything else can be deal with, in a couple of summary sentences at the end.
BIS
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: PBR Street Gang
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.
