UC turned down, appeal questions

Hi again,
I'm now submitting evidence to the tribunal. My advisor has decided that i don't need to make a submission, as my form was very detailed and they just haven't read it properly. However, my response to the assessor's report that i submitted for the MR did not turn up in the evidence bundle, so it appears that they've lost it or something and i've been told to submit it again.

Now, i still have this on the computer and there is an online portal to submit evidence into, so I can just drop it into there i think. But there's no mention of this in the B+W guidance and I wondered if this was ok to use, or whether it was just likely to get lost again? It's getting close to a month after i got the bundle and i wanted to get on with it so I'll put it in tonight anyway, but i thought that i would post here to ask if it was worth sending a further copy by mail.
gb

Hello, I return!
I now have a date for my tribunal in a few weeks time. Unfortunately, my advisor appears to have gone missing: I cannot get in touch with the local advice service at all and it's too far away for me to go there and have a look. However, i've found another advisor from a local support charity, who is also going to contribute to the hearing. She also thinks that it might be a good idea just to set out on what grounds i'm appealing on very briefly, so I've contacted the courts to tell them that's she's now going to be my main representative, changing over from the other, nowhere to be found, one.

I called the courts up on the phone and they told me to sent my request to them in writing. However, i forgot to ask them over the phone to make sure that my new representative would be dialled into the tribunal hearing, which will take place over the phone. Given that it's very hard to get thru again and also very expensive, i instead made the request for them to dial her in, in the letter that i sent to them. Will this be ok, or will I have to phone them again to sort that out?

Also, I don't know if we have had crossed wires, but I spoke to the new representative today and she seemed to think that I could claim limited capability for WRA if I could cobble together 15 points over the whole of the WCA, rather than having to meet one of the highest scoring descriptors. This is wrong isn't it? She has a lot of experience so I'm assuming we've misunderstood each other but I've always understood this to be wrong and it's left me a bit worried. I've no one else to help me in the hearing as it stands but I don't want her help to be worse than nothing. Any advice gratefully received as ever.
gb

Courts are keeping me on the phone for 30 minutes or more before I can get thru, It's costing me a fortune. I've notified them of my new rep by writing this week, but what I wanted to clarify was, having asked them to dial the representative into the tribunal in the same letter, would they go ahead and organise for that to happen, or would I have to call them again to make sure that they sorted that out?

Re LCWRA: what the rep was saying was that, as far as I could gather, if I were to score 15 points or more on the WCA, that would mean that I had a limited capability for work related activity, not just LCW like you say there. When I brought up the LCWRA descriptors (which are basically the highest scoring descriptors on the WCA i believe?) she seemed mystified by them. But I've been corresponding with her by email up until now and she has a tendency to go over something a few times before she catches my meaning, so I'm hoping once she's actually gone thru the papers (which has not yet happened, but there's a while to go yet) it will all be a bit clearer.
gb