× Members
ESA113 and Appeals Bundle
- RachelPotter
- Topic Author
13 years 10 months ago #69215 by RachelPotter
ESA113 and Appeals Bundle was created by RachelPotter
Hi, if you appealed should the 'bundle' include an ESA113 form if your doctor had filled one out?
Best wishes,
Rachel
Best wishes,
Rachel
- michaelg
13 years 10 months ago #69216 by michaelg
Replied by michaelg on topic Re:ESA113 and Appeals Bundle
Fedup wrote:
Hi Rachel
If an ESA113 has been issued there's no reason why it shouldn't be in the "bundle".
Michael
Hi, if you appealed should the 'bundle' include an ESA113 form if your doctor had filled one out?
Best wishes,
Rachel
Hi Rachel
If an ESA113 has been issued there's no reason why it shouldn't be in the "bundle".
Michael
- RachelPotter
- Topic Author
13 years 10 months ago #69217 by RachelPotter
Replied by RachelPotter on topic Re:ESA113 and Appeals Bundle
Hi Michael, can I be cheeky and put this another way?!
As there was not an ESA 113 in my appeals bundle, does that mean my doctor wasn't asked to fill one out?
Sorry for being pedantic!
Best wishes,
Rachel
As there was not an ESA 113 in my appeals bundle, does that mean my doctor wasn't asked to fill one out?
Sorry for being pedantic!
Best wishes,
Rachel
- michaelg
13 years 10 months ago #69220 by michaelg
Replied by michaelg on topic Re:ESA113 and Appeals Bundle
Fedup wrote:
Hi Rachel
I have searched and it appears doctors are not always asked to complete an ESA113. There's evidence (not sure how reliable) that Tribunals have questioned why not and requested one.
This is not my specialist area, so I will leave this open to a mod familiar with ESA113 to answer.
Sorry i can't be of more help.
Regards
Michael
Hi Michael, can I be cheeky and put this another way?!
As there was not an ESA 113 in my appeals bundle, does that mean my doctor wasn't asked to fill one out?
Sorry for being pedantic!
Best wishes,
Rachel
Hi Rachel
I have searched and it appears doctors are not always asked to complete an ESA113. There's evidence (not sure how reliable) that Tribunals have questioned why not and requested one.
This is not my specialist area, so I will leave this open to a mod familiar with ESA113 to answer.
Sorry i can't be of more help.
Regards
Michael
- RachelPotter
- Topic Author
13 years 10 months ago #69221 by RachelPotter
Replied by RachelPotter on topic Re:ESA113 and Appeals Bundle
Thankyou Michael, I appreciate your replies.
I was wondering because CD mentioned 'burden of proof' in another post.
Obviously that is not for a first application of ESA but I have a reassessment coming up.
I will be very interested to see if my GP is contacted this time as there is no evidence to suggest that they were last time.
Thankyou again,
Rachel
I was wondering because CD mentioned 'burden of proof' in another post.
Obviously that is not for a first application of ESA but I have a reassessment coming up.
I will be very interested to see if my GP is contacted this time as there is no evidence to suggest that they were last time.
Thankyou again,
Rachel
- michaelg
13 years 10 months ago #69222 by michaelg
Replied by michaelg on topic Re:ESA113 and Appeals Bundle
Fedup wrote:
Hi Rachel
I think you really need an answer from a mod who has knowledge of ESA, this very complicated (to me at least) benefit!
M
Thankyou Michael, I appreciate your replies.
I was wondering because CD mentioned 'burden of proof' in another post.
Obviously that is not for a first application of ESA but I have a reassessment coming up.
I will be very interested to see if my GP is contacted this time as there is no evidence to suggest that they were last time.
Thankyou again,
Rachel
Hi Rachel
I think you really need an answer from a mod who has knowledge of ESA, this very complicated (to me at least) benefit!
M
Moderators: Gordon, latetrain, BIS, Catherine, Chris, David, Angel