× Members

letter from mp about pip mobilising distance.

More
11 years 10 months ago - 11 years 10 months ago #107469 by sjr
Hi received this in a letter back from my mp this morning after writing to him about the pip mobilising distances-

I wish to clarify the change from 50 metres to 20 metres as the qualification for the enhanced rate of mobility is designed to provide greater clarification over how the assessment process will work. The 20 metres threshold is designed to act as an automatic qualification for the enhanced mobility component because clearly if someone is unable to walk such a short distance, they are severely disabled.

However, even those who can walk up to 50 metres can still qualify for the enhanced rate mobility component if for example, regularly walking over 20 metres would have an adverse effect on their health or leave them fatigued. The guidance has also been moved away from a focus on aids and appliances, to that of distance.

The Government has now included in regulations that consideration must be given to whether claimants can carry out activities safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly and in a reasonable time period.

Be interested to hear what you think was surprised he used the word walking instead of mobilising.

Sue
Last edit: 11 years 10 months ago by .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 years 10 months ago #107479 by

suejrussell wrote: Hi received this in a letter back from my mp this morning after writing to him about the pip mobilising distances-

I wish to clarify the change from 50 metres to 20 metres as the qualification for the enhanced rate of mobility is designed to provide greater clarification over how the assessment process will work. The 20 metres threshold is designed to act as an automatic qualification for the enhanced mobility component because clearly if someone is unable to walk such a short distance, they are severely disabled.

However, even those who can walk up to 50 metres can still qualify for the enhanced rate mobility component if for example, regularly walking over 20 metres would have an adverse effect on their health or leave them fatigued. The guidance has also been moved away from a focus on aids and appliances, to that of distance.

The Government has now included in regulations that consideration must be given to whether claimants can carry out activities safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly and in a reasonable time period.

Be interested to hear what you think was surprised he used the word walking instead of mobilising.

Sue


Hi S,

This is a pretty standard response from an M.P. regarding this issue.

Have you seen this topic in The Spotlight Area :

www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/forum?view=top...d=10&id=98502#106702

This is also covered in our :

PIP Claims Guide. (2nd Link on page)

bro58

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 10 months ago #107482 by sjr
Hi Yes have sent to the consultation and sent my mp a copy and this was the reply. Just hope it is as he says otherwise I will be asking for his support if I have to appeal. Sue

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonlatetrainBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.