- Posts: 7
ME/CFS - HOW TO COMPLETE ESA50
- Steph
- Topic Author
- Offline
I am severely affected by ME and like a lot of others am trying to get into the support group because I would not be capable of work or WRA. My best chance of that seems to be under the “mobilising” descriptor but I know that there is also an “exceptional circumstances” rule. Should claimants give evidence of how they meet the exceptional circumstances criteria when filling out the ESA50, by putting information along those lines into the “other information” section of the form - or are you supposed to wait and see what the outcome of your application is and then make a case for that on an appeal if you are unsuccessful ? I am also wondering does putting in information like that, indicating that you personally think you are a support group candidate, get the DWP’s back up and provoke them to bring you to a medical?
ME is a variable and fluctuating condition - I have been advised to write that in response to every descriptor I give information on. Is that really necessary in the case of each descriptor or would it be enough to just state that in the section of the form where you give information about your illness/disability and leave it at that?
I am also struggling with the amount of information to give. The form says to give as much information as you possibly can about the difficulties you have with each of the descriptors, and because ME doesn’t neatly fit the box ticking the DWP are offering I am finding it necessary to give a lot of information - however, at the back of my mind I can vividly remember my last medical for incapacity benefit where right at the outset of the medical the HCP criticised me for providing too much information on my IB50 [you can’t win can you?]
Any advice anyone would have on these questions and any other advice applicable to someone with ME would be really appreciated.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51284
Welcome to the forum, you might want to have a look at the following FAQ which explain where everything is
Welcome to Benefits and Work
The first thing to say with a fluctuating condition such as ME/CFS is that you should only be assessed based on how you are for the majority of the time and you should apply this when answering each descriptor/question that you think is appropriate. For example; you might answer; for the majority of the time I can only do X for Y minutes a day, when I am worse then it is only Z minutes.
Be careful of the Mobility question, it is not just about walking but also includes your ability to propel a manual wheelchair over the same distances, the usage must be reasonable so if your ME/CFS would prevent you using a wheelchair, then you should make this clear in your answer.
There is no reason why you should not refer to the Exceptional Circumstances Regulations in your ESA50, Reg.29 covers the WRAG and Reg.35 covers the Support Group, the following has information that may be helpful.
www.cpag.org.uk/content/making-exception
There is no right or wrong amount of information to include with your ESA50, however, if you are stating that you have cognitive problems as a result of your ME/CFS then you should explain how you have managed to complete the ESA50 and any supporting information.
If you have more questions, please reply to this post.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- elaine pyrke
- Offline
- Posts: 114
Steph wrote: ME is a variable and fluctuating condition - I have been advised to write that in response to every descriptor I give information on. Is that really necessary in the case of each descriptor or would it be enough to just state that in the section of the form where you give information about your illness/disability and leave it at that?
My personal approach is to tick ‘no’ for activities where, although I can do them quite a lot of the time, I can never absolutely rely on being able to do them at any given moment and I can’t repeat them – I explain that in the box underneath. The answers get very repetitive.
I understand the DWP WCA handbook says if you can’t do something reliably and repeatably and safely, you should be deemed unable to do it at all. But I don’t think the nurse who did my last WCA knew that, so it may be worth stating that explicitly on the form. (I didn't put it on my ESA50, only on my appeal submission; I was moved from WRAG to SG on appeal, without going to tribunal.)
All the best
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
elaine wrote:
Steph wrote: ME is a variable and fluctuating condition - I have been advised to write that in response to every descriptor I give information on. Is that really necessary in the case of each descriptor or would it be enough to just state that in the section of the form where you give information about your illness/disability and leave it at that?
My personal approach is to tick ‘no’ for activities where, although I can do them quite a lot of the time, I can never absolutely rely on being able to do them at any given moment and I can’t repeat them – I explain that in the box underneath. The answers get very repetitive.
I understand the DWP WCA handbook says if you can’t do something reliably and repeatably and safely, you should be deemed unable to do it at all. But I don’t think the nurse who did my last WCA knew that, so it may be worth stating that explicitly on the form. (I didn't put it on my ESA50, only on my appeal submission; I was moved from WRAG to SG on appeal, without going to tribunal.)
All the best
You are correct e,
It is also explained in our guides that if you cannot carry out an activity repeatedly, reliably and safely, for the "majority" of the time, (> 50% of the time) then you should be classed as not being able to do so at all.
With respect to SG entry, ESA Reg 34. (2) should also be considered :
“A descriptor applies to a claimant if that descriptor applies to the claimant for the majority of the time or, as the case may be, on the majority of occasions on which the claimant undertakes or attempts to undertake the activity described by that descriptor”
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/794/regulation/34/made
So it is not just for the majority of the time, but also on the majority of occasions that the claimant attempts the activities.
bro58
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ELEANOR
- Offline
- Posts: 139

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- slugsta
- Offline
- Posts: 9439
ESA Medical – What to expect
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.