Labour’s proposed new personal independence payment (PIP) 4-point rule will lead to almost nine out of ten current standard daily living awards failing on renewal, a freedom of information request has revealed.  In effect, Labour are hiding the virtual abolition of the standard rate behind a seemingly small change to the scoring system.

Labour intends to remove the daily living component from claimants who do not score 4 points or higher for at least one activity, when their PIP award is reviewed from November 2026.

The department have now revealed the proportion of current claimants who would lose out under this rule, as of January 2025:

  • Out of 1,608,000 enhanced daily living awards, 13% (209,000) get fewer than 4 points in all activities.
  • Out of 1,283,000 standard daily living awards, 87% (1,116,000) get fewer than 4 points in all activities.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has suggested that the number of claimants who will lose their awards will not be as high as the 1,325,250 that these figures suggest.

Instead, they argue that the actual number will be 800,000 because people will fight harder to be awarded a 4-point descriptor, including by challenging decisions.

At Benefits and Work, we think that the OBR are being much too optimistic in arguing that over half a million claimants will be able to increase their scores, because:

  • there are very limited opportunities to get four point descriptors for claimants, especially with some conditions,
  • the standard of assessments is very poor in many cases and there is a lack of understanding of many conditions,
  • the mandatory revisions and appeals process is very long-drawn out and demanding and there is very little support available for claimants whose health conditions may limit their ability to pursue an appeal.

Whatever the final number might be, there will be vastly fewer standard rate daily living awards by the time all current awards have been reviewed. And very few new claims from November 2026 will lead to an award of the standard rate daily living component.

We know that Labour plan to scrap the work capability assessment in 2028 and replace it with a new, single assessment for PIP and the UC health element. 

It now seems entirely possible that they are preparing the ground for the complete abolition of the standard rate of the daily living component altogether for new claims, when the combined assessment is introduced.

You can read the full FoI response here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Thats my interpretation as well.  Ironically my point of view has always been since PIP is primarily financial support, the most vulnerable are those with the lowest level of payments, but governments always look at it a different way, they tend to cut those with the least support and leave the ones with the most support.  Of course they shouldnt cut either. The money is there.
    This is by far the biggest targeted cut since I have first had to claim health benefits, usually sickness or disability is targeted, not both at same time, and usually changes to eligibility are nowhere near this extreme.  They are literally wanting more than half of all health related claims gone.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    I'm sorry but I'm on enhanced PIP and my son on standard pip

    Weve done a test and we will be OK!!!

    I'm also a qualified debt adviser and benefits adviser. 

    I set a charity up 14 years ago 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Hi hope this makes sense. .Hi I just don't understand forgive I have difficulties understanding things I got awarded pip last November 2024 after a face to face review I was awarded high mobility and lower daily for 10yrs the highest sored I got was a 3 on the daily living points but 11 altogether on mobility I scored 12 will this end if the new rules take place also my daughter is my carer would that stop to ..very confusing for me  tia
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Concerned You won't be affected 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Concerned I think you will keep the mobility part.  You will lose the daily living part after 10 years.  I don’t know about the carer part.  If it is based on daily living rather than mobility, then she will lose it.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    The PIP assessment was already a joke.  Now it will be even worse.  I have autism and haven’t spoken to anyone but my Mum for years.  I don’t socialise ever due to extreme anxiety. In the assessment I was asked if I own a mobile phone.  I do.  I use it for apps, internet etc but never phone anyone due to anxiety.  However the fact that I own a phone was apparently proof that I was socially fine.  I was awarded 2 points.  I didn’t appeal as it would have been too stressful.  I’m sure PIP assessors are trained to find ways to not award points despite disability.

    The capability for work assessors are much better.  I was put in support group ESA.  Now I’m going to lose that and have to look for work.  How am I supposed to do that when I can’t talk to anyone at an interview?  If I can’t go to an interview will I also lose UC standard and have to live on nothing?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    I recently attended a PIP tribunal representing a client.  Although the judge explained that the panel were independent from DWP, nothing seemed further from the truth, with his dismissive attitude towards my client.  My client applied for PIP a few years ago, and scored zero.points across the board. They left it, but their conditions worsened to the extent that they were practically housebound, lying on the soda riddled with pain. Their teenage daughter was main carer. They applied again, completing the form with the help of a friend,  once again zero points. The Assessor's Report showed that THE HP had lied and so I submitted a Mandatory Reconsideration.  This resulted in a standard award of D/L but no mobility, even though the client was now reclusive and when they had to attend medical appointments they were in a wheelchair.  Their mental health was now seriously damaged.

    I advised them to appeal. They judge told them they were being greedy as they had an award.  He kept repeating questions and when my client shouted out in frustration he told them off.

    At the end we were informed that the decision would be in the post.... not usual.  The decision letter came  - with 12 being awarded.  However, not one activity had scored 4 points, 3 points were awarded at most.  The award was until 2027, at which time our client would lose their PIP. No award was made for mobility even though the client's conditions are degenerative  and non-reversable.  Obviously this government has told the Tribunal to side with DWP and no longer objectively assess a client's eights to an award.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 days ago
    Well what dya know, lying and abolishing help by stealth, how very Labour…..and we thought the Tories were the nasty party, they didn’t even come close to how nasty this Govt is!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Dean Spot on. They make the Tories look kind.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 days ago
    Blatant discrimination against a group with a recognised protected characteristic under the 2010 Equality Act.

    I am amazed a change that may negatively impact 9 out 10 Standard Rate Daily Living PIP claimants can be implemented with so few opportunities for any challenge.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Dave_5150 Then maybe we should do a claim under the act ,
      If you think you’ve been unfairly discriminated against you can:

      complain directly to the person or organisation
      use someone else to help you sort it out (called ‘mediation’ or ‘alternative dispute resolution’)
      make a claim in a court or tribunal

      Using a public service is the area we'd probably use 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 days ago
    I’ve taken this to my MP and they got back to me same day, they’ve submitted a written PQ and sending out a press release about this calling on HMG to reconsider.

    Keep putting pressure on MPs especially if your MP is Labour. We need to be relentless!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 days ago
    I was raped , contracted HIV,  I self harm,  I have bulimia and as you can imagine I have mental health issues,  problems being around people , I have bad days and VERY bad days,  it's not that I don't want to work, I can't,  these cuts to the physically and mentally vulnerable is extremely dangerous, I'm so worried,  not just for me but all those up and down the country 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    While Mobility is not part of these latest changes Many people who get it may no longer be able to use it for the reason it was awarded As it will be needed for other more urgent reasons Like care or therapy This could mean more people housebound As transport will become unaffordable
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    They created the rules of this game, they played & lost, so they tweaked the rules,lost again, re-wrote the rules AGAIN & now want to RIP UP the rules of the game THEY CREATED.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    1.3 million+ will lose PIP
    Another 1 million+ will lose LCWRA

    RED ALERT
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Ruby Mine supports the cuts, oh dear,hope she's not expecting to keep her seat next election 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Anon We all need to stop looking for glimmers of hope and start fighting back.

      Nobody is coming to save us, we have to fight like hell to keep our much-needed and entirely-deserved financial support.

      Write your MP, demonstrate, share the facts on social media, write to your local papers, join Crips United and Crips Against Cuts, organise...

      We're disabled but we're not helpless, we have voices, let's USE them, and get this shameful policy dumped before it even begins.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Anon It's not scaremongering though is it? It's not like the green paper doesn't exist,it does and a lot of us are going to be in real financial trouble, it would be foolish to write all this off as nonsense and tell people there's nothing to worry about,people need to start making plans now and looking at where they can make cutbacks in their finances,it's the sensible approach and the correct thing to do
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Anon We look at reality.

      Not glimmers of hope.

      Awareness of reality helps people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Anon That's nice that you are looking for a glimmer of hope, but you need to face the reality that this is not scaremongering.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Unfortunately, the sad reality is none of these people & MP'S can be trusted whatsoever, including local councils.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    What I have been wondering about is why the Government have concentrated their proposed changes to PIP qualification purely on the Daily Living. Why have they excluded Mobility? In no way do I want that included and am pleased they have left it alone - but - could it be because of the Mobility car scheme and anyone politically having fingers in that particular pie?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Moose The 'daily living' component of PIP, is going to be the 'passport benefit' to auto qualify you for LCWRA in Universal Credit, in the future, possibly from Nov 2026, so it seems they are cynically trying to make it nearly impossible for future claims.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Dez Also, the owner of the motability scheme is a major donor to the Liebour party.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Moose It could be down to the fact that they would find it extremely difficult to leave existing PIP claimants with absolutely nothing as opposed to just a measly £300 a month (and that's if you get enhanced) and it's the lowest amount of money that PIP offers so why bother kicking up a fuss about it when you could paint it as a small mercy? 

      "Well, we're not going to leave them with absolutely no money to live on! They'll still get the mobility component of PIP because we've been gracious enough to leave that alone, you see!"

      But also yes, I think it is mainly to do with the Motability car scheme because apparently banks make a killin' off it (sure - they refuse to say how much but... they're banks, you know they make bank lol) and you can bet they wagged the finger at the government and the government listened because hey, money talks.

      Perhaps a good call to action would be for people to return their Motability cars prematurely so these banks realise the profits they'll lose when people ultimately use their mobility component to save what very little money they have left after the cuts. An half-serious suggestion, obviously, but it makes you wonder if it'll make the banks soil the bed. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Moose 20% of all car sales are due to mobility operations so it is a big chunk in the market. Wonder how the care industry people feel though since they won't be able to sell aids and other things for care
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Moose Made booboo in other comment. Should read

      For example 

      11a (0 points) + 12a (not b) (0 points) = 0 points [no PIP]
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I agree that one of the main issues is the very poor standard of assessments. Recently I have seen a number of Health Professional Reports which faithfully record what the individual has said but then goes on to award 0 or 2 points as they claim that the evidence suggests that they can do an activity unaided or using an aid. This is based on very flimsy evidence if any. One person I supported was awarded 0 points for planning and following a journey. The assessor appeared to justify this on the grounds that she has a driving license. The assessor also helpfully recorded that she has not driven for the past three years.! The assessor gave no points for taking nutrition as she eats one meal a day even though they recorded that her husband has to prompt her to eat. This person has a medical condition which means that she experiences constant and chronic fatigue which the assessor described in the report as "tiredness".  I have been supporting another person who is very clearly entitled to PIP but was awarded too few points to get an award. She has physical and mental health conditions and has decided that she can't face challenging the decision. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Do we have the number of ESA/UC LCWRA claimants that do not receive PIP? Another group that's going to be hit. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Helen Galloway I’ve just read somewhere if you have an ongoing award from now say until 2027 they are going to be reviewing all pip claimants regardless of award date, is that correct? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Anon Indeed pensioners can claim attendance allowance, but what's the alternative benefit for those of working age losing PIP and LCWRA?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Anon WCA is not being scrapped until 2028. The PIP reassessments or new claims  for PIP will be under the new 4point rule from Nov 26. But assessments for other benefits ESA or UC will continue with the WCA until 2028 when they will switch to using the PIP daily living criteria.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Bern400 I'm one of those. I could claim pip and get the 4 points if it were fair. But we all know it wont be. It's going to be hell for us on LCWRA. Please vote in the local elections.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Bern400 True
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    So the government will be saving alot more than 5 billion then in cuts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Cecelia I've never believed for a minute their so called 5 billion, it doesn't add up because so many people will fail plus as result not only losing pip, it will alter their UC award or similar. I know I got through on last claim but it was paper based, the 2 prior that were in person I scored pretty much nothing in the care section, not enough for standard. So I count myself as in danger as I believe the with the tricks they play in f2f I'd of scored lower, simply because they don't see the internal hell going on.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Equal Lives (Norfolk, suffolk) are calling for comments on the govt proposals, which they will anonomise and send to all mps in the area.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Slb Emailed them. Thanks for raising this Slb.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.