Labour’s proposed new personal independence payment (PIP) 4-point rule will lead to almost nine out of ten current standard daily living awards failing on renewal, a freedom of information request has revealed.  In effect, Labour are hiding the virtual abolition of the standard rate behind a seemingly small change to the scoring system.

Labour intends to remove the daily living component from claimants who do not score 4 points or higher for at least one activity, when their PIP award is reviewed from November 2026.

The department have now revealed the proportion of current claimants who would lose out under this rule, as of January 2025:

  • Out of 1,608,000 enhanced daily living awards, 13% (209,000) get fewer than 4 points in all activities.
  • Out of 1,283,000 standard daily living awards, 87% (1,116,000) get fewer than 4 points in all activities.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has suggested that the number of claimants who will lose their awards will not be as high as the 1,325,250 that these figures suggest.

Instead, they argue that the actual number will be 800,000 because people will fight harder to be awarded a 4-point descriptor, including by challenging decisions.

At Benefits and Work, we think that the OBR are being much too optimistic in arguing that over half a million claimants will be able to increase their scores, because:

  • there are very limited opportunities to get four point descriptors for claimants, especially with some conditions,
  • the standard of assessments is very poor in many cases and there is a lack of understanding of many conditions,
  • the mandatory revisions and appeals process is very long-drawn out and demanding and there is very little support available for claimants whose health conditions may limit their ability to pursue an appeal.

Whatever the final number might be, there will be vastly fewer standard rate daily living awards by the time all current awards have been reviewed. And very few new claims from November 2026 will lead to an award of the standard rate daily living component.

We know that Labour plan to scrap the work capability assessment in 2028 and replace it with a new, single assessment for PIP and the UC health element. 

It now seems entirely possible that they are preparing the ground for the complete abolition of the standard rate of the daily living component altogether for new claims, when the combined assessment is introduced.

You can read the full FoI response here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @James Matt I voted strategically as in my area the race was really between the conservatives or LibDems while Green and Labour were did not stand a chance. As I did not want the Conservatives even though the MP was fairly a liberal conservative on I went for the LibDem candidate and he has been doing well. In each area the local situation would dictate which way to vote and for which type of election if we are to stand a chance in getting people who are going to be supportive towards the disabled and sick. So even a Conservative or Labour that is on your side deserves support but not those who do not stand up for disabled and sick people!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @James It'll be green. Don't trust lib dem
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Slb My suggestion is in every local election leading up to the next election is to vote either green or libdem strategically to keep the neo nasties out!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I get enhanced daily living and standard mobility rates on PIP, my whole daily living part of the award would rely on the 4 points I got from Engaging with Other People, the tribunal awarded me. So technically I'd still get PIP but the proposals are so arbitrary and even with the award I get now, I certainly don't trust the DWP to honour it next time. If these changes go ahead, hardly anyone with variable and invisible disabilities will get PIP. Some days I am fully capable and able, other days I can't do nothing and more or less homebound with no control over this. I don't deal with change very well, I don't cope well with competition or pressure, ruthless in our world! Stuff like zero hours  contracts and open plan workplaces make work completely inaccessible for me. Still waiting for the government to say where the employers are who are willing to work with limitations such as these... None of it is well thought through at all and a political choice. They must tax the assets of the super rich, not attack the poor and disabled.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    A new online petition is urging the UK Government to ‘stop the cuts’ to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and provide “fair and compassionate welfare policies that protect, not punish, the most vulnerable in society”.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/721828
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @James This needs to be heavily shared
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Monalisa SM Think this must be a new petition. The one that is gaining traction is this one: https://www.change.org/p/tax-wealth-don-t-cut-disability-support
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @James Why has it goes so less signatures when it’s such a serious problem?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @James signed, although I don't think it'll any difference. Labour are hell bent on these reforms, come what may. It was so unfortunate that last July only approx 60% of the electorate voted, of which approx 20% voted Labour and yet due to FPTP (and everyone's wish to kick out the Tories), Starmer got a 174 majority. It would have been so much better for all of us if his majority had been around 12 (Cameron in 2015) or 21 (Major 1992)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    my review is 2027 i will be 66 just hoping i will get a light touch review seeing that i will be 1 year shy of retirement age ?? fingers crossed 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Of course most fail. That's why the new test was brought in. Rather than do more to help those unemployed & in good health, this government pursues highly immoral policies which punish the easy targets & the vulnerable to pander to the unthinking mob & RW media. It's bound to cost them dearly come the next GE. There are no moral grounds to strip financial support from those suffering chronic ill-health & who are largely unemployable in any economic climate, let alone one of  rising costs. The Tory cutbacks initiated by IDS directly cost some people their lives. That's verifiable fact. So will Starmer's Labour. All so avoidable if only we had people of integrity & principle in government. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    It's just proposals that will get stopped and people could write open letters to reform aswell to tell them how much they'll be fought if they do cut support if they win next election farage is another one that doesn't like disabled people .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Lill Reform are not friends of the disabled, nicely ferages recent speech indicates that they would probably make things worse for all of us,people who have been sick like myself for 30 years are unemployable and they damn well know it,I was medically retired 30 years ago,they didn't even want to move my job to my home town which they could have done,I worked for the courts service,they effectively caused my unemployment claim by refusing to move me to a suitable location,litrally down the road from my home,I then in 2005 went on to lose a kitchen job ( in 2 days ) a voluntary job also in 2 days of starting and then a job in a school after 6 months when I couldn't keep up,never worked since,so 3 lost jobs in 1 year,I gave up after that when I developed further medical conditions, noone us going to employ me,I'm 56 in a few months as well,all this is absolute madness
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I don't trust them not to go further either. I currently get EDL because I get 8 points in one of the few MH related categories and 2 points for prompting in several others. Reading between the lines of their arguments so far I find it probable that they will scrap the prompting score entirely. That will leave me entirely reliant on the single category remaining to keep not only SDL but LCWRA. If they decide that we must tick more than one category or if they reduce the points in that remaining category or - most likely - I get a bad assessment and lose the 8 points, I am doomed. I cannot survive on basic UC, I cannot tolerate ANY forced contact with work coaches and I would not survive the many months in would take to appeal. My MH is already in crisis at the prospect of all this, if it actually happened I would lose my remaining grip, and be gone.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    My renewal date is Sept 2026. 
    Lucky me. I'm sure they will conveniently push the new rules on me one way or another. 
    Absolutely done up like a kipper. 
    The four points might as well be 104 points. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @The Dogmother I'm also hoping for an indefinite award this time around too but no doubt the government will be putting pressure on DWP to not award them in the midst of these changes. 

      They're clearly already unhappy with the number of people on indefinite awards as it is as there's talks that they're going to review the amount of time between the reviews on indefinite awards and Timms has the audacity to disguise it as "improving the service".

      Like he's doing the chronically ill who have zero chance of getting better a favour by possibly suggesting they be subjected to more frequent reassessments! Unbelievable. 

      He should just admit that Reeves isn't happy with the savings projections and wants him to shake us upside down by the ankles some more. I'd have a lot more respect for him if he did.

      I can only hope they don't intend on changing the light touch form itself even with the more frequent check-ins but who honestly knows at point?

      And thank you. Best of luck to you and your husband too! Your medical evidence should serve you well at a tribunal at the very least.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @The Dogmother The phantom down voter strikes again.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Anon @Anon I'm absolutely dreading it tbh, either way. I've a lot of new medical evidence too.  That i shall start to gather copies of very soon. I've ongoing consultant appointments and Other things aswell. I just wish I could get an ongoing award, but no doubt they'll be as rare as hens teeth even more so. Looks like I might be in the midst of moving onto UC and doing my pip review at the same time or very closely together. 😭
      But I am not letting my pip go easily, I never have. Apart from the loss of money there's a principle at stake too. Luck to you. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Slb Sorry, my last comment was in response to this! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @The Dogmother
      I’m in the same boat. Nov 2027 is my renewal date.

      However, right now, DWP backlogs are around 12-18 months so with any luck you may get your renewal form earlier than Dec 2026. I’ve seen people whose awards don’t end until summer 2026 reporting that they got their renewal forms already, for example.

      Never thought I’d say this in response to getting a PIP reassessment but fingers crossed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Thank you, B&W, for all your much appreciated work.


    This clip says it all. Politicians in America brutalizing those on benefits. Kicking those below as you climb the greasy pole seems to have become humanity’s favourite international sport.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @CaroA Propaganda isn't a wonderful thing ? It is just like the attacks on our human rights where they find a handful of cases the government lost on over human rights gives us a knee jerk reaction to tell us that our human rights are bad for us! Right!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @CaroA The truth.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    This is the killer, literally in some cases: 

    "the mandatory revisions and appeals process is very long-drawn out and demanding and there is very little support available for claimants whose health conditions may limit their ability to pursue an appeal"

    I pursued an appeal over 3 years for someone who was eventually awarded standard daily living but no mobility, when they should have got the higher mobility. It was a big payment backdated for the three years and a shed load more than the nothing originally offered, nonetheless only about half what I knew was owed. I just didn't have the stamina to take it further and I feared that because of the "lack of understanding of many conditions" there was a high likelihood we'd fail because the evidence would not be accepted.

    This is what the dwp and government rely on - our lack of wherewithal to fight. They must be rubbing their hands when they see the statistics, though they might have underestimated our desperate strength when backed into a corner.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Yes, the OBR's forecast that so many people will successfully gain 4 points by 'fighting' harder is deluded. It's almost like no one in the OBR has even met a person who claims PIP. Yes, people will try for 4 points in order to survive, but you have to fight tooth and nail as it is for even significant disability to be recognised and supported.
    Mr Timms has not so far responded to my email. Perhaps he wasn't flattered by it. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Thank you; utterly depressing, and oh so predictable.  And neither Reform or the Tories will repeal this.  Effectively, we are going back to pre-1992 (when DLA was introduced).  At least I'll get the mobility component but it's a hell of a cut in my standard of living. Combined with wage suppression at work and the lack of promotions (which I have already mentioned to the Head of HR, so will be expecting my P45 sometime soon!) means that it's going to be very grim from around 2029 (my renewal date is 2030 but expect that to be brought forward).
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Matt And HOW they have ALL ganged up on us behind the scenes….💩😷💩😷💩😷
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.