Debbie Abrahams, chair of the commons work and pensions committee (WPC), has this week written to the secretary of state for work and pensions, Pat McFadden, demanding to know how the final decision on the Timms review will be made and whether the work capability assessment (WCA) is still going to be abolished.

Mcfadden appeared before the WPC last month and as we noted at the time, refused to rule-out PIP cuts or rule-in abolition of the WCA.

Now, Abrahams has written to McFadden pointing out that, at their meeting, he had said that the final decision on the Timms review “would have to be the Government’s, since it was only the Government that had to consider policy and expenditure in the round”.

The committee now want a written answer explaining:

“What is the process by which final decisions will be made concerning the Timms Review, and who will be involved in this?

“What conversations are being had as part of the Timms Review with those nations where disability benefits are devolved?”

In relation to the WCA, the committee noted that McFadden had said he would communicate with the committee to provide as much clarity as possible about the future of the WCA.  The committee has asked McFadden:

“We understand the WCA will be continuing until 2029-30. When can we expect to hear whether the WCA will continue beyond this date? Is it still your intention to abolish the Work Capability Assessment? If so, what is the timetable for this?”

In addition, the committee raised the issue of the harm likely to be done to claimants by the reduction in the UC health element for new claims from next April, citing a report highlighted last month by Benefits and Work. The committee has asked the DWP to set out what safeguarding measures it will be taking to mitigate these harms.

Abrahams has asked for a response by 7 January but, on past performance, it will be some weeks after this before a reply is received.

You can download the full letter in .pdf format from this link.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I have written to the BBC to ask why they have a disproportionate amount of news covering welfare cuts, and (unfair) tax rises.

    They replied their content is in line with expectations and the public's mood.

    When the BBC cant even offer balanced reporting, we know the rest certainly wont, the narrative is what the Greens are up against, a massive battle.

    The BBC also wouldnt comment about all of the inaccuracy in Laura's show.  Repeated mistakes when talking about spending, deficits, tax levels etc.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    GBNEWS this morning, casually calling for more benefits cuts in order to fund a War with Russia...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Kat Rehman There is also the quote from Quintin Hogg (later Lord Hailsham) at the time of the welfare state vote - ‘If you do not give the people social reform they are going to give you social revolution’ - or something like that. I think he may have had in mind post WW1 big strikes and soldiers likely to refuse to go and fight in Russia, but I'm not a historian.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Neil You think they are bad, my dad watches Talk TV and you should hear the anti disabled venom spewing from lowlife Jeremy Kyle and Julia Hartley Brewer , vile excuses for human beings 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Tonedial My dad watches Talk TV , you should see the rabid rantings of Jeremy Kyle and Julia Hartley Brewer about benefit claimants 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @keepingitreal Ironically the welfare state was only brought in because the ruling classes were shocked at the amount of conscripts who were classed as unfit to serve and fight. Now you can obliterate a country or target by pressing a button and releasing a bomb. Obviously it's not right the cuts and attacks on the disabled 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @keepingitreal They would just let them rot like they do to all the other veterans. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Didn't a great many people decide to take the unfortunate way out back in the 2010s during the Tories attempt at anything like this? Or am I wrong... hopefully.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Neil
      Unfortunately you're right. Not only were there many suicides, others starved to death. The number of deaths was well into the hundreds over a decade ago, so it's probably well into the thousands by now. We don't know the exact figure because the DWP stopped collecting the death statistics years ago - having so many people die shortly after having their benefit wrongly stopped was proving to be rather embarrassing, so their solution was not to make sure people got the support they needed, it was to make sure the figures didn't exist so they couldn't be used against them. 

      You will no doubt be stunned to learn that no-one was ever held accountable for a single one of those deaths - no minister, no-one at the DWP, no-one at the outsourcing companies trousering vast sums of public money to carry out the wretched assessments. The lesson the Labour right appears to have learned from this is to try to do the same thing all over again, which is why they have to be fought as hard as possible.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The sick and the disabled being used as a political football to grab media headlines  and divide and conquer. It’s literally sickening.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    “We understand the WCA will be continuing until 2029-30. When can we expect to hear whether the WCA will continue beyond this date? Is it still your intention to abolish the Work Capability Assessment? If so, what is the timetable for this?”

    Understand based on what?
    The government plans for the WCA to be abolished in 2028/29. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @John I dont think there is a new system, they advertising it as an abolishment of the assessment, to try and make it sound like they doing the ill a favour, but they actually abolishing LCWRA altogether.

      There will be a health topup for those with PIP daily living (which they currently working on to make it tougher to qualify), and also a topup for those who have LCWRA at the time of the abolishment.  After that point, there is no way to get it other than PIP daily living for new claimants, or those who only had LCW.

      The benefit of this is LCWRA costs will stop rising, and will go down as people die off, and eventually settle on a much lower amount.

      LCW is being effectively replaced by a system that will allow the average jobseeker to negotiate with a work coach to reduce their required activity without needing an assessment.  They can stomach that as it isnt any extra money over the standard jobseeker, just reduced activities.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John what is this new system you speak of?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John
      "Are they just going off the budget when Reeves said "The government is also announcing that DWP will conduct an additional 122,000 Work Capability Assessments for existing claimants by 2029‑30 to ensure people are receiving the right level of support."

      They may just be going off the budget but we don't know. As the select committee chairman, Abrahams may have had conversations or correspondence with ministers that we don't know about. In any case, if WCAs are still happening in 2029/30 then the WCA will not be gone by 2028/29. McFadden also added to the uncertainty by, as this article puts it, saying he would "communicate with the committee to provide as much clarity as possible about the future of the WCA." But if there has been no change in policy, and the previously stated policy still stands, he could have just said that - he would have had nothing to lose by simply restating government policy. There would then be absolutely no need whatsoever for any "clarification" (since you don't need to clarify a policy that hasn't changed) and there would therefore have been no point in his obfuscation when he appeared before the committee. When a politician  obfuscates it's usually because there is something they don't want to publicly admit.

      As usual, everything is as clear as mud, and we won't know what is really going on until McFadden responds to Abrahams' letter - maybe not even then if he obfuscates in his reply as he did before the committee. That would not surprise me in the least.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John
      For some reason the first paragraph got edited out so I have reposted. 

      Are they just going off the budget when Reeves said "The government is also announcing that DWP will conduct an additional 122,000 Work Capability Assessments for existing claimants by 2029‑30 to ensure people are receiving the right level of support."

      The number 122,000 looks to be the backlog of people who have requested reassessments due to their health condition getting worse. According to the answer to previous written parliamentary questions the DWP actually hopes to clear almost all of that backlog by mid 2026.

      If the WCA is abolished in 2028/29, say April 2028 and active claims are moved to the new system only when they come up for reassessment. Then as claims are in theory supposed to be reassessed at least every 3 years. It would take until April 2031 for all existing claims to move to the new system. Excluding those in the severe conditions criteria group who are never reassess. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John

      The number 122,000 looks to be the backlog of people who have requested reassessments due to their health condition getting worse. According to the answer to previous written parliamentary questions the DWP actually hopes to clear almost all of that backlog by mid 2026.

      If the WCA is abolished in 2028/29, say April 2028 and active claims are moved to the new system only when they come up for reassessment. Then as claims are in theory supposed to be reassessed at least every 3 years. It would take until April 2031 for all existing claims to move to the new system. Excluding those in the severe conditions criteria group who are never reassess. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    "We understand the WCA will be continuing until 2029-30"

    The next election has to be held no later than around August 2029, so if the WCA is still in place at that point, then god knows what will happen. If it's still in place in 2030 then it becomes a decision for whatever government is in power after the next election, and given the fragmentation of the vote among five or six parties that could be a government of just about any political complexion.