The blundering DWP yesterday shared the email addresses of all the attendees of the first Pathways to Work Green Paper virtual consultation event in a very basic breach of data confidentiality.

An email sent out to all attendees on Thursday provided a link to the Teams meeting for the first virtual consultation event, due to take place on 6 May.  However, it included all the email addresses of the participants in the ‘To’ section of the email.

These included 26 members of the public, 10 representatives of local authority and voluntary sector organisations and 19 staff working for the DWP.

An attachment with the email even set out which of the DWP staff were ‘required’ participants, which were ‘optional’ and detailed which section of the DWP they work in, such as, corporate support and development, occupational psychology, private pensions, labour market directorate, disability and health, customer experience.

A few hours later, the DWP sent participants another email stating:

“Apologies for the Teams invite that was shared, there was a technical difficulty. The previously scheduled Teams meeting has now been cancelled, and a new meeting invitation will be shared with you shortly.

“In the meantime, if you would like us to use a different email address for the updated invitation, please reply to this email by 02/05/2025.”

As an apology for a serious breach of confidentiality it stopped short of being fulsome.  In fact it stopped short of admitting what had happened and apologising for it at all.

Benefits and Work understands that the breach has already been reported to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Meanwhile participants are still waiting for another invitation to the virtual event, which is due to consider “Reforming the structure of the health and disability benefits system”.

Attendees at the other Green Paper consultation events, which include in-person events so secret no-one – including the participants - knows where they are happening, will be hoping the DWP manages their confidential data a little more professionally.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Is it bad that I'm thinking those DWP staff are plants? Would they have declared themselves?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Sam If we are going to be split off into small groups on Tuesday morning for that meeting, perhaps each of the DWP staff are looking after one sub-group.  Some others might not be attending at all, but being cc'd into the conversation.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @rtbcpart2 Lol true, I woukdnt trust the DWP if they told me water is wet!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Sam I'm not going to say you don't have a right to be suspicious but - at the same time - it's no secret that there have been whistleblowers from DWP that are disgruntled with the way things are handled and have sought to help claimants navigate the system.

      Of course, this all depends on what exact purpose these DWP staff have for attending but say they're there to advocate for us and explain why the process is unfair as it is and any further tightening on the rules will hurt more of the genuinely disabled, I'd say those who have first-hand experience as assessors or whatever will have the credentials to be taken seriously.

      As for the question as to why they didn't declare themselves: I don't feel it's a good idea to potentially speak out against policies your employer intends to implement as part of your job and attach your name to it so that a paper trial can be tied back to you but perhaps that's just me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Sam 😂😂😂 oh, @Sam, it's not bad, it's an indication of the paranoia to which we're being driven. They're venus fly traps.