Andy Burnham has announced that James Purnell, a former New Labour work and pensions secretary of state, will be his chief of staff if he becomes prime minister.

Purnell was work and pensions secretary under Gordon Brown. 

Most recently, whilst out of politics, Purnell has been the CEO of Flint Global, which the Guardian reports has advised companies including Google, Microsoft, Glencore, Apple and Thames Water.

One of Purnell’s most notable actions whilst work and pensions secretary was an attempt to charge interest rates of up to 26.8% per annum on crisis loans, which had always been interest free.  The move was eventually blocked by Brown.

In December 2008, in a welfare reform debate, Purnell told MPs “we want virtually everyone claiming benefits to be preparing for, or looking for, work. It is a fair deal—more support, in return for higher expectations.”

In the same debate, Purnell quoted approvingly from the Gregg report in favour of imposing sanctions on claimants:

“That is why conditionality is so important in the welfare state. Only 5 per cent. of incapacity benefit stock claimants voluntarily take up the support that the pathways to work programme offers, and only around one in four lone parents takes up the support offered by their new deal. Partners in couples in which no one is working face even fewer obligations than lone parents.

“The Gregg report found that conditionality backed with a regime of sanctions improves outcomes.”

If Purnell still holds the same view that virtually everyone claiming benefits should be preparing for or looking for work, then he is likely to approve of the approach to benefits being taken by Alan Milburn, whose interim report lamented the failure to link PIP to work or to functional improvements. 

As chief of staff, Purnell would have no role in deciding policy.  But he would play an important part in deciding which policies get the most government time and attention and how much pressure is applied to ministers to get specific policies delivered.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Sick of hearing about cutting welfare for defence what a disgrace 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Wayne Totally agree Wayne , this wasn't even an issue until the Tories raised it, Badenoch and her crew especially Helen Whately are obsessed with cutting welfare to the point that they look genocidal against the physically and mentally vulnerable 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Wayne me too 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    I had high hopes for Burnham being sympathetic towards claimants 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Deb I have to agree with you 100 % Deb,this wasn't even an issue (defence) until the Tories raised it because as you say , Trump wanted other NATO countries to chip in, if Russia wanted to destroy the rest of Europe they would have done it by now , Putin doesn't do subtle and doesn't waste time in wanting to carry out what he wants,  I did vote Green in the local elections solely on the basis that they are the only party that seem sympathetic towards the disabled, Badenoch and Helen Whately (shadow DWP minister) is obsessed with cutting the welfare bill , her Tweets are obsessional with this very subject, it seems the physically and mentally ill seem to be one of the last legitimised prejudice
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Neil (real one) I don't think we can trust any of them Neil , sadly , i think politicians see us as disposable and certainly the lowest of the low when it comes to political priorities 
      If anything the government decides against us, I hope we rise up and hit the streets instead of venting on here , I know I'm guilty of that but I feel that strongly that I would definitely march or protest 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Duncan I dont think any politicians currently - from any political party - are sympathetic  other than Corbin and perhaps the Greens and some of the labour backbenchers - some of whom quit - if I am not mistaken, and if not for those MPs, the cuts would have been far more severe than what they currently are.  Nowdays, you have to know, that any of them, can promise one thing and then take it back when theyre in power.  Since Trump said he wants out of NATO, the EU and UK are on a time frame to invest in denfence. So sick of hearing about it too. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Duncan So did I, unfortunately 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    I really think we need to reiterate the final paragraph:  "As chief of staff, Purnell would have no role in deciding policy."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @SLB  But he would play an important part in deciding which policies get the most government time and attention and how much pressure is applied to ministers to get specific policies delivered.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Well, at least it's not Liz Kendall!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    If Purnell has not changed his views in the last 15 years. The following might be indicative of a welfare reform he wanted.

    Purnell was chair of the IPPR think tank in 2011 and helped to write their "National Salary Insurance" policy paper.

    National Salary Insurance would be a contributions based benefit. It would be an income replacement benefit paying 70% of salary up to a cap. It would be paid for up to 1 year to the unemployed and to the incapacitated. The payments would be an interest free loan repaid over 3 years when the claimant returned to employment. The benefit would have the conditionality of JSA for the unemployed and ESA for the incapacitated. It woud count as income in regard to housing benefit. 

    So creating a system where the short-term unemployed or incapacitated are far better protected. By a benefit based on personal responsibility, the amount varying by the individual and it being a loan.

    And where the long term unemployed or incapacitated remain on very low benefits. That most of the general public never expect to end up on. And might resent paying taxes for. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    As you said, he is not going to be directly involved in policy making and Andy Burnham has repeatedly said that he is not in favour of short term cuts but long term welfare reform, with a "whole person" approach, rather than just cutting benefits and sparking a revolt!  So Andy Burnham  has repeatedly stated the opposite to what this guy has stood for.  


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @LJH 100% agree. they all seem to lie and break promises
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Chris ALL parties lie and make false promises. I’d never trust any of them. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @axab43 Labour politicians 'repeatedly ' give lots of promises. Most, are lies.

      If you haven't learned that about Labour yet, there is no hope.

      Burnham is no different, in fact, he will probably be worse. The man has no conviction.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @John But you have no solid proof that Andy Burnham is going to go back on his repeated  statements about a long term approach to welfare, that I have stated on here,  and his opposition to short term cuts, in lacking effectiveness and stirring up backbench rebellions that so damaged Starmer.

      He has repeatedly said that.    He said that when he was friends with Purnell.  He is hardly likely to go back on such an often stated view of welfare reform, because of Purnell's track record from the early 2000s on welfare.  We don't know what he would advise now anyway.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @John So that means letting the rich off and benefit cuts too fund the military.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    I'm trying to not let it bother me, for decades now politicians talk tough about reforming welfare, however when they try to implement these ideas, they often hit a brick wall of reality.. The government cannot simply wish away a severe mental health condition or a debilitating physical disability, and human rights laws protect people who are medically unfit to work.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Dpb999 "A brick wall of reality" -love it and so true ! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 days ago
      @Dpb999 I remember reading a newspaper article back in the 1990s about them wanting to reform incapacity benefits and it was the exact same anti-sick and anti-disabled rhetoric they are using now!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    Apparently another site are running a story about the Tories ordering a Benefit review too save more than they originally said being 23 Billion.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @LionHeartCook Kemi Badenoch can keep barking about welfare cuts; it's rather Andy Burnham's caravans to move on through.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    I remember James Purnell he was a Rabid Disability Hater but he didn't have much time too implement his changes.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    The little weasel wanted to treat claimants like Jeremy Kyle, guests, he tried to float the idea of putting people on a lie detector to check claims. He was and probably still is a nasty piece of work.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @Tony It was not his idea. Voice risk analysis technology was already being used by local authorities for housing benefit claims, and was already being trialled by the DWP before James Purnell became DWP minister. During his time in office the DWP did further trials. Then after he left office the Coalition government abandoned the plan of ever doing a national rollout due to the trials conclusions being it was unreliable, not cost-effective, and caused issues for vulnerable claimants. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    "In December 2008, in a welfare reform debate, Purnell told MPs we want virtually everyone claiming benefits to be preparing for, or looking for, work. It is a fair deal—more support, in return for higher expectations.”

    He was talking about ESA. The creation of the work related activity group.
    ESA was sold as :
    Personalised conditionality matched by personalised support. Based on a clear bargain that almost everyone on benefits would be expected to take active steps towards work, but where those expectations are based on an individual's needs and circumstances
    Group 1 JSA Work Ready.
    Group 2 ESA Work Related Activity Group. Cannot currently work but in the future work is a genuine possibility.
    Group3 ESA Support Group. No conditionality but support available for people who choose to seek it.

    So he was not talking about some vision of going further than the government in 2026 has already gone. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @John Hello can ask as anyone heard anything Esa contribrition based  what happening  with it any update ?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @John Thanks for the clarity, John. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    Disgusting what about a danger to person health if pushed into work and end up hospital can we sue them 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Wayne I think the DWP would have a deluge of claims Wayne, I have bulimia , self harm , contracted HIV after being raped ,the meds I'm on mess my stomach and I'm off to the toilet all the time and I can't be left alone with men , I would be an absolute liability for any employer as would millions of claimants if they were frog marched into a job 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    I'm just so scared about what we could be in for, I really am....apologies again for going on
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Neil (real one) It's natural to feel that way Neil , I think we are all the same , for what it's worth for the sake of my mental and physical health i had to take a break from watching or reading MPs talking about benefit cuts, I've just adopted the view that what ever happens , happens , if you have friends , family or even organisations behind you , you'll be okay 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    Are we actually screwed or is it just possibly?  Shiver,shiver
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @Neil (real one)
      No it does not mean we are screwed. 
      It was 2008 and he was talking about ESA and the creation of the ESA work related activity group. He was not talking about going further than in 2026 the government has already gone.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      How do precisely?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    Flint Global is a registered lobbyist. A company ofher companies and the rich hire to try and shape UK government policy.

    The Downing Street chief of staff is the most senior policy advisor to the Prime Minister.

    Appointing a lobbyist as chief of staff is not a good sign for democracy. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    Flint Global is a registered lobbyist. A company ofher companies and the rich hire to try and shape UK government policy.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 25 days ago
    "we want virtually everyone claiming benefits to be preparing for, or looking for, work." - wow, so blunt, what planet are these cruel, unempathetic people living on?!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 25 days ago
    Another monster.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 25 days ago
    Looks. Like the tide is coming in