A report which the DWP has sat on for over three years reveals that over half of all PIP/WCA assessors leave within their first year. 

The independent research for the DWP was conducted in February to April 2022, looking at recruitment and retention over the whole of 2021.

The report reveals that approximately 40% of recruits left during training and an astonishing 52% left within the first year of employment.

This means that 2,000 to 3,000 new full-time equivalent assessors have to be recruited each year, which is approximately 60% to 90% of the total of the assessor workforce . There were approximately 3,200 assessors in total at the end of 2021.

On average, it costs approximately ÂŁ3,000 to hire an employee, not including training costs.

One reason recruitment is tough is the very poor image that the work has.  As one assessor explained to the researchers:

“When you go onto Indeed and read really bad reviews for IAS…at first you think…well, you wouldn’t touch them.”

A professional recruiter had a similar opinion:

“Lots of people think about the job and then read these [reviews] and just shelve thinking about the job for a year… or just disregard the job.”

That was back in 2022.  The DWP claim that things have improved since then.

They say that “The research was conducted in Spring 2022. Since then, DWP and health assessment Providers have worked together to improve recruitment and retention. The full-time equivalent health assessor workforce has increased in the period to the report being published.”

But a quick look at Indeed shows that reviews for PIP assessor jobs are still dire:

“Hard, stressful, emotional and soul destroying work. Huge criticism culture. Difficult making decisions under their guide lines that dont feel right as a health professional.

“Being ashamed, not telling people what you do, time constraints, pressure, high levels of stress.

“Like it ruined my mental health and makes you lack confidence in your ability.”

“Long and mentally exhausted you were promised it was a 9-5 but it the workload is impossible so you will always work overtime.”

Not only that, but the sheer number of jobs being advertised is enormous. 

Recruitment site Indeed claims to have over 1,000 functional assessor posts, though there may be some duplication as the assessment companies themselves advertise, but also use recruitment agencies.  Glassdoor claims to have 1,777 PIP assessor vacancies.

Meanwhile, the DWP has had to fall further behind with new PIP claim assessments, because it is trying to catch up with the backlog of PIP reassessments and doesn’t have the staff to do both in a timely fashion.

As the department admitted in its most recent PIP statistics release, clearance times “have recently shown variation between regions which is primarily a function of differing levels of available assessment capacity.”

So, not only are they short of assessors, but the staff shortages vary depending on what region you are in.

And there may be worse to come.

Because one of the big attractions of the role for many assessors is the opportunity to work from home. 

So, the recent announcement that the proportion of face-to-face assessments is to be increased to 30% for both PIP and the WCA, rising from lows of 6% for PIP in 2024 and 13% for the WCA may make recruitment even harder.

At the moment, the only health professionals who can carry out assessments for the DWP are:

  • Doctors
  • Nurses
  • Physiotherapists
  • Occupational therapists
  • Paramedics (only for PIP)

One of the suggestions made in the report is that the DWP consider broadening the scope for qualifying roles to other health professionals, including midwives and prescribing pharmacists.

Benefits and Work would not be surprised to see trials of this suggestion begin before the year is out.

You can read the full report here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Unfortunately those that tend to stay enjoy their power and I imagine do their utmost to fail people and take away their lifeline. I've met such assessors as have so many others when you appeal you get the paperwork produced by these vultures and it bears no resemblance to your actual life,conditions or even the assessment you had.
    For these people to do that job year in year is a example of how callous,uncaring and vicous basically wicked people they are.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    What an indictment of the whole unfair and oppressive system.  If 95% of claimants are honest and genuine (and I agree they are) think of the money and stress that would be saved by simply accepting their word instead of trying by fair means or foul to prove them liars.  As for the other 5% I can live with that, there are people in all walks of life prepared to take advantage of the system and they usually give themselves away eventually.  Isn't it about time governments treated claimants with respect instead of contempt?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    My daughters PIP assessment was performed not by a nurse or other medical person. I was performed by a Water Mitty type in a world of her own.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    I find it hard to understand why assessors are leaving?
    It is not hard to ask the claimant a question, get a response, then totally ignore the claimants response, and write the complete opposite in your report.
    And it does not matter if the claimant gets a transcript (at great expense) from the recording. The DWP does not care that the assessor had lied, nor does the assessors professional body who dismiss the fact that the assessor has lied with a statement that this is just an opposing opinion.  Money for old rope with zero comeback in my opinion.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Such is the state of play there will probably end up being a raft of assessors becoming claimants. Stress equals Ill health. Fundamental changes are needed within society. Insurmountable issues that no one can fix.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    My very first assessment for agoraphobia was done by a physiotherapist. Needless to say I was turned down and then awarded on appeal.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Mark Absolutely ridiculous, Mark. So glad you managed to turn it award on appeal. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    As an ex-district nurse who could no longer physically do the job, I thought carrying out PIP assessments would be a great solution. I would use my knowledge to fairly assess claimants, whilst visiting 3 clients a day to carry out PIP assessments. the training is gruelling and out of a cohort of about 12, I think I was the only person from my group to still be in the job 3 months after training finished. I managed 1 year, and ended up with stress/anxiety so bad that I had to take time off myself. I found that my "fair and honest" reports, were being reviewed by non-professionals in the DWP who would argue with my reports, telling me that my professional judgement on how conditions impact people was incorrect. they would tell me to change my report or be put on report. As I needed the job, I reluctantly changed a report to what they wanted, it was then checked again by someone else in the DWP who said my report was incorrect and it did not reflect how a condition would impact someone. they told me to change it (back to how it originally had been), I did this, it was then checked by another person in DWP who again argued that my report was incorrect and to change it. As this meant that now my report had required 3 changes, it meant me put under close supervision where all my reports would be reviewed by a supervisor. if I did not then reach their A grade on 5 consecutive reports I would lose my job. At this point I resigned as I was thoroughly disheartened that people without medical experience in the DWP were questioning my reports. My take from this experience was if I had been left to use the knowledge that had led me to being employed to do these assessments in the first place, my reports would have been fair, but I suspect the DWP can only allow a certain amount of awards. I would honestly say that of all the people I assessed in one year, that 95% of the people are honest and should be awarded PIP. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Jane Jane thank you so much for your honesty in this. I've worked as a volunteer supporting benefits claims - mainly PIP - for the last 6 years, and this sounds exactly like 'the bit he claimant doesn't see or hear'. It's profoundly unethical that all sides are under such pressure when, if you cut it right back to basics, the government exists to serve the people. I agree with you: 95% of the claimants I've worked with strike me as absolutely genuine: sadly that in itself is no guarantee of an award. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Jane Jane, thank you so much for your account of the impossible position you were placed in by the mindless number-crunching culture among DWP administrators. You've accurately described their crazy-making, self-destructive policies that unravel the long-term health of assessors and claimants alike. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    This just means in order to fill these assessment roles the government will lower the bar to who can carry out these assessments and that's very worrying indeed 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Honestly it does not surprise me that there are so many vacancies for these positions.  Its just the worst job for a health professional as the way you are expected to work and screen applicants is frankly unethical.  There is no room for empathy or compassion and the vast majority of cases allocated to you are way outside of your scope of practice.  Those quoted percentages were accurate for the cohort I started with.  Several left during initial training and almost every week someone would resign.  I only lasted just over 2 months.   
     Horrible job!!  I wouldn't advise my worst enemy to do it. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I’ve been invited to join a panel to discuss carers’ rights in employment. Concerned I may be facilitating a box ticking exercise by agreeing to take part, but i also want to have a say if it’s useful. Any opinions please? Don’t think i’m allowed to say I’ve been invited, and i’m not allowed to share anything from discussions, inclusing proposals put forward, so I won’t sign my usual username here ( I haven’t been active on here since summer)...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @bronc Thanks bronc
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @gg If you are allowed to have your say then I would go for it and put forward the moral case to protect carers rights. I've taken part in DWP online  'consultations' which have the feel of a box ticking exercise but at least I've got the opportunity to speak truth to power.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    How long before they start doing assessments by AI? I wouldn't be at all surprised if Reform does exactly that if they get in.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Ani Sara @Ani sara id rather have a dog assessing me. They've no agenda.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @John John: Trained dogs and rats have a near-perfect rate of sniffing out certain health conditions. I'm sure cost-cutting will lead the DWP down that route before long. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Aw I think the DWP already does or tried that, with AI reading PIP or WCA forms. The error rate was 65%. So bad humans have to check the AIs work. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    In my opinion the only reason the DWP uses health professionals to do disability assessments is to give the assessments false credibility. It is not a medical assessment. And even if it was a medical assessment the health professionals are usually not qualified to diagnose, treat or give a prognosis for the health condition. As it is outside their area of expertise. Making them as much use a layman. The assessment is just an assessor going through a script, a job almost anyone could do. And according to tribunals assessors frequently depart from reality. A polite way of saying they make things up or lie. So it is not like using health professionals has resulted in assessors being honest trustworthy. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Continuing to lower the bar for whom can carry out the PIP assessment is a shameful thing to do. The way things are going it wouldn't surprise me if the DWP eventually makes it so that any unskilled/untrained person will be eli
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Thelux Thelux: It'll be randomly assigned by rota like jury duty 😆
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    "At the moment, the only health professionals who can carry out assessments for the DWP are:

    Doctors
    Nurses
    Physiotherapists
    Occupational therapists
    Paramedics (only for PIP)"

    Not according to the DWP.
    According to the DWP for PIP assessments.
    doctor
    nurse
    physiotherapist
    occupational therapist
    paramedic
    pharmacist
    by exception, another registered health professional, providing the requirements set out at 3.1.2 are met. (there are at least 12 other registered health professions. So with agreement of the DWP in theory anyone from Art therapists and Chiropodist to Speech therapists and Radiographers)

    Also somewhat concerning is the requirement of not having any sanctions besides disability (can not do practice their health profession due to disability) and approved practice setting (required to be supervised to actually practice their health profession) attached to their health profession registration can be waived by the DWP. So people who due to their lack of competence or their poor conduct have sanctions in place to protect patients and the public. Can if agreed to by the DWP do DWP disability assessments.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/personal-independence-payment-assessment-guide-for-assessment-providers/pip-assessment-guide-part-3-health-professional-performance
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @John Pip is about function. Therefore OTs are well placed to do the assessments. However, many feel conflicted ethically and morally....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Aw I listed Art Therapist because starting with a A it is the first on the list of registered health professions. Not because I have anything against Art Therapists.

      As far as being highly qualified medical professionals. A DWP disability assessment is not a medical assessment. And even if it was a medical assessment they would not be qualified to diagnose or give a prognosis or lead the treatment for health conditions of claimants they see. So it seems rather irrelevant. The only reason health professionals are used to do DWP disability assessments is to give the process the illusion of credibility. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @John Art therapists are actually highly trained MH professionals who are postgraduate qualified and certified by the BAAT. It's psychotherapy, not an art class. All Art therapists are qualified, not all therapists using art materials and calling it art therapy are BAAT certified Art Therapists.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @John I think my post reads like disability and approved practice restriction are not waved. They are always waived. They never bar someone from being a DWP disability assessor. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    The whole dwp cruelty machine really needs to be scrapped now it’s such a shambles and replaced with universal basic income 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @ABC UBI...   and in the small print it'll be programmable money which means you can be limited on what you spend it on and it can have an expiry date just in case anyone tries to save a bit, ie., spend it by the end of the month or you'll lose it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @John Universal basic income is just that, basic. All humane versions of this will have top ups for various circumstances. The great advantage to the whole country is that for vast numbers of people it saves the government the huge administrative cost of running a means test on each individual. 
      And for all those people for whom it is enough for their needs, they don't have to endure what someone else in this thread aptly called the "DWP cruelty machine"
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @ABC The problem with universal basic income is that it usually does not take into account different people's different living costs. From their housing situation to extra costs of disability. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    So the local chemist is maybe going to do the assessments in future who’s next bob the builder?an awful practice had my wca back in 2017 was all rushed medical paperwork was lost full of lies and had a abnoxious assessor too so 10 years later thought it might of improved but looks like it hasn’t same old 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    The first principle of the medical profession is do not harm. By agreeing to work for the DWP you are in immediate breach of that as you will be expected to lie and do harm to claimants from implementing the sanctions process to writing deceitful reports for benefit assessments. By working for the DWP you are a cog in machine which engages in institutional violence on a daily basis against some of the poorest most vulnerable people in our society. On several occasions I've experienced first hand how the so called health professionals  at different assessments lie, lie and lie, engage in intimidatory tactics and show zero sympathy for someone in distress. I have no sympathy for these people. No job should involve you being part of an organisation which does harm to others. The excuse that you are merely carrying out orders is no defence for your own moral culpability in harming others.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @CaroA I am trying to remember how many years ago there was an undercover person doing the training. And I remember the trainer herself, saying 'This job is toxic'. Of course it is when it has everything to do with reducing the welfare state and nothing to do with OUR welfare.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @bronc Thank you this is a brilliant summary of this brutal system.  I was a long-term career for one of my closest family members who died very distressingly and I was diagnosed with PTSD from this and cumulative trauma.  When I saw a young woman for my assessment shortly after this major bereavement I explained that I listened to podcasts in the morning because it stops my head spinning from it all.  The report afterwards said she likes to listen to podcasts all day!  This person said they thoroughly enjoyed their job.....