News

This is a disgusting system for genuine poorly people to navigate. It causes severe issues with lifes. I'm in shock at what lies was all over mine. Also waiting over 7 weeks for the report from court.. I've never has so many bad deep thoughts of ending this hard life. Not my fault of course. Circumstances make me this way. Trying to survive now for 4 years with pennies. I'm loosing my mind 

I don't know if it would of changed the outcome of my claim but when I got the report after I was refused PIP there were a lot of things that were lies and misconceptions and things that were assumed about my case. The assessor had taken a dislike to me from the start because I was kept waiting for over an hour before my interview ..so by the time she came to fetch me I was hyped up with stress which made me hungry upset & tense so she responded back in a snappy, hostile way. I had also taken out one hearing aid out due to severe itchy ear so was judged on this later on and I was also marked down because I had a dog , (even tho' someone else usually walked him)  and  I c

Were easily disprovable errors made in your PIP assessment report?

I always get a copy of my report, I don't trust the assessors they lie and lie and lie again.  Even pointing the lies out at mandatory reconsideration does nothing and providing evidence.  They just believe the assessor and I always have to go to tribunal. I have won every time.  I hope by doing this they are not thinking about removing the mandatory reconsideration process as that would be awful for claimants who get it overturned at the point or are to scared to go to tribunal

As a benefits adviser I always ask the clients to get a copy of the assessment report before I carry out a mandatory reconsideration. In many of them out and out lies have been recorded. Even pointing them out in the mandatory reconsideration makes no difference. I have seen some shocking cases

Yes, there were outright falsehoods in my PIP assessment report the first time I applied for PIP. 1) that I could drive and how this proved I had no cognitive deficits when I am actually banned from driving due to my traumatic brain injury, 2) a detailed physical exam that never happened with bends and stretches, on a exam table that did not exist in the room, 3) that I attended alone, when my husband & carer were with me, 4) that I had no trouble carrying a purse when I don’t carry a purse, 5) that I bent over from standing and tied a shoelace when I was wearing slipons so that never happened. There was more that I can’t remember but it was too much to go line by line. 

This would massively help, in my case, incompetence from someone not being able to count to ten (the assessor awarded 10 points, but the decision maker couldn’t count, mistake was only noticed 18 weeks later, (waiting on the decision letter, then requesting assessors report), could have been avoided. 18 weeks of stress due to a typing error! So they called it!  

The cynical part of me wonders if they are doing this to filter out what would be very strong MR submissions. E.G. if the claimant doesn't respond with any concerns about the report will be ok to reduce or end the award. If the claimant responds with good rebuttal evidence decide to make the correct award. That way they would also be able to say that the MR requests for MRs have significantly reduced because of improvements they have made to the assessment process. In effect it is a pre MR MR. Whatever happened to the Health Professionals being meant to request evidence from the claimant's stated medical professionals involved in their care. I have gone through a DLA to PIP transition of my own, a PIP claim and a renewal for my partner and 2 PIP renewals for my neighbour. All of which required a MR and one Appeal. Not once was any medical evidence requested by a HP despite all medical professionals information being provided 

I wish. I have the unusual situation where I have completed a MR for a neighbour. The previous award was for standard daily living and enhanced mobility. This was changed to enhanced for both when I did the MR. At this renewal they sent in consultant letters and a copy of repeat prescriptions. Again the award was for standard daily living and enhanced mobility. However the Decision Maker has stated that they have changed the points recommended in the Health Professional's report using the reasoning that the claimant is not under a consultant specialist for muscular skeletal conditions or mental health. This is despite the prescriptions showing three different pain medications for muscular skeletal problems. The claimant has decided against any operations on their spine due to the dangers of anesthesia with their serious lung condition. The claimant telephoned PIP to notify that a MR would be submitted and requested a copy of the HP report at the same time. This was requested again 18 days later and still did not arrive. I submitted a MR along with copies of the medical records obtained from the claimant's GP, and stated that the HP report was still needed and that further submissions might be made when the report was received and studied. That was four weeks ago and the report has still not been received even though the claimant received a text two weeks ago saying that they had received the MR submission. The DM also used the old "you can drive so you must be able to do this and this" argument. Unbelievable 

I think it would be a great idea, especially if it reduced the time taken for PIP reviews.  My daughter's view has been on-going since January last year and we are now at the appeal to tribunal stage.  My daughter is fifty two years old and was diagnosed as autistic last year following many years of social anxiety and chronic depression.  After several requests I recently received a copy of the assessor's notes and found quite a few oddities;  apparently my daughter is able to read and understand complex information (she isn't!) because she has a driving licence and could obviously understand complex intonation.  Only the test she took was in 1990 and seven years before the theory test was introduced.   No allowances were considered for her autism ie masking, psychological effects of the interview etc. and a review n eighteen months time was recommended in case her condition of autism improves   I could go on but I won't!   Suffice to say we could well have sorted out these discrepancies (deliberate perhaps) had there been an opportunity to review it sooner. 

The DWP would have you ear your own vomit and then treat thar as a meal at the Savoy. Reporting this to claimants won't make any difference other than to upset claimants a little earlier. I've been fighting an appeal for 3 years. They don't want truth but government approval to act like barbarians.

I've never required this as always got top rates of DLA (Indefinite) and then PIP (10 years) as I submit hundreds of medical reports each time. However,  the way the DWP act these days I think it's an excellent idea. It would certainly depend on how fast they process these once you have to point out errors or lies.

Yes in my experience if it shortens the loop of back and forth comments. I have had several pip assessments where sweeping assumptions are made to discredit my mobility by adding unproven things or minor comments as facts that support refusal or downgrading. I had a single trip with work where I was asked how I coped and mentioned a taxi and a difficult walk. That was reworded in the final document report as can walk where I can’t and on that occasion had exceptional help and support to do this one off. They love to pick a single or rare thing and make out it is the norm. I eventually gave up as it would have required a full tribunal to argue. My letters in reply ignored and the mandatory reconsideration pretty much the same as the first report. To be able to challenge inaccuracies or misinterpretations early would be an advantage. 

Yes, absolutely.  My latest pip assessment came back as eligible for basic only.  The report was filled with distortion/misquoting of things I had said in the interview,  Outright Lies throughout. 

In my first PIP assessment, my assessor decided how far I could walk, based on me lying on the sofa for the whole assessment. She ignored evidence from 3 consultants and my GP, as she knew best! She even said she would not physically examine me, as she could see that I was too exhausted and in too much pain!

this I think could end up being a double edged sword, I have seen reports done by these people and been on the receiving end of them. They lie, outright with no compulsion if the report is contested are thier lies going to be acknowledged? The last judgement (it is a judgement not an assessment) that I was put through was done over the internet, it was delayed by an hour and when it did happen it was obvious from the background they were in thier own home, she sat there swilling coffee the whole time. At one point she kept going on about one of my medication dosage, I could not remember at that moment and said I had put everything on the form and supplied evidence via copies of my prescriptions. Still she kept going on about it until in the end I had to struggle to get up and fetch them. In her report she commented and I quote "was observed holding a medicine bottle" like what was that supposed to even mean? what bearing did it have on my conditions? It is going to get far worse when they move everyone to universal credit and they are getting rid of the support group. Not only are you going to be judged by someone with no medical background to gain the PIP but will have to go through it all over again, probably even worse, by some desk jockey to see if they can force you into doing a job that your disabilities would make you incapable of achieving. I doubt there is not one person on here who would not trade everything to enjoy good health and leading a normal life and work like others do. Yet we are treated like criminals and demonised for something we did not ask for and have no control over

I was denied Pip from my first initial application May 2019 after being diagnosed with breast cancer. Zero points awarded.

My son had pip taken off him because he lost points on how he managed money. He said he remembered his council tax bill coming to his house !! As he has aspergers and adh he can add etc but has no ability to manage his money.  To have seen his assessments prior to decision would have allowed me to clarify his abilities better.

There were a few misrepresentations and I had taped the interview, so would have been able to prove, however I was already too distressed after I had already been messed around over a few months, so didn't feel able to take it any further after a decision had been made as it would have been too stressful! I would, however, have appreciated a chance to amend before it got to this stage. 

I sent a lengthy and true pip renewal back. The lies told in my report have deeply affected my mental health to the point where I gave consent ending it all I am so sick of fighting a system that doesn't listen . I have many health issues the latest a stroke and still having to fight a system that is so very unfair