The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has published a report arguing that awards of ‘incapacity benefits’ are now at their highest since the financial crisis and will reach an all-time high in 2029.  It suggests that the only measure that has ever significantly reduced awards was the reassessment of claimants using a harsher test.

This week’s ‘Welfare Trends Report’ was originally going to be published under a Conservative government in July, but the election led to it being put on hold. However, given the focus of both the Tories and Labour on getting disabled claimants into work, it will no doubt be equally welcomed by the current administration.

The OBR report looks at incapacity benefits right back from the invalidity benefit of the 80s and 90s through to the current system of employment and support allowance (ESA) and universal credit (UC).

It claims that incapacity benefit awards were declining from the early 2000s to the mid-2010s.  This period also saw the introduction of ESA in 2008 and universal credit in 2016.

The change from incapacity benefit (IB) to ESA led to a fall in the caseload from 6.7% of the population in 2008 to 4.9% in 2018, largely due to IB claimants being reassessed for ESA and being found capable of work under the new, harsher regime.  Between 2011 and 2015, 1.3 million IB claimants were reassessed for ESA and 250,000 of these were found fit for work.

The fall would have been even higher if the pension age for women had not been raised, leading to more women having to claim incapacity benefits instead of state pension.

Under UC the proportion of claimants rose by 2.1% to 7.0% between 2017 and 2024, entirely reversing the previous fall.  And the OBR predicts that the rise in numbers will continue over the coming years, with a record high of 7.9% being reached in 2029 if current trends continue.

The OBR suggests that the main cause of the increase in awards is not a rise in the number of people making claims.  Instead it is what happens as claimants move through the system.  The proportion of claimants who drop out before getting an award has fallen and the proportion of claimants who are successful has risen.

The number of initial claims for incapacity benefits between 2010 and 2023 accounts for just 20% of the increase in awards. 

However, 30% of the rise is due to fewer claimants dropping out of the process before a decision is made.

And very nearly 50% is due to a higher approval rate: more claims are being accepted as valid now than in the past.

In part, this could be because of the type and severity of the conditions for which people are now claiming, the OBR suggests. 

But, whatever the reason for the increased approval rate, the message from the OBR is clear:  reassessments using a harsher test are the only measure that has reduced caseloads in the past. 

As readers will know, in the Autumn of 2023 the Conservatives announced plans for a revised WCA to be brought in for new claims from April 2025.  This would make changes to the substantial risk regulations, the mobilising activity and the getting about activity.

The changes were to be aimed only at new claimants and were estimated to be worth £1.3 billion a year in savings for the DWP.  Existing claimants would be protected by the “Chance To Work Guarantee", which the Conservatives claimed would abolish the WCA for the vast majority of existing claimants with limited capability for work-related activity (support group).

Labour has yet to say whether it will take the changes to the WCA forward and, if it does so, whether this will also include the “Chance To Work Guarantee". This report from the OBR will certainly provide ammunition for those who wish to impose the worst of those Tory plans.

You can download the ‘Welfare Trends Report’ from this link.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Surely as the retirement age has been increased so the working age 'pool' has increased - thus many who would have expected to retire at 60 / 65 are now forced to continue working even though their health may be declining with age and more so with lengthening NHS waiting times. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I would be very interested to know what experts in statistics make of this OBR report and particularly the suggestion that "the only measure that has ever significantly reduced awards was the reassessment of claimants using a harsher test" (from your article above).  

    Perhaps this temporarily reduced payments but the problems faced by ill and disabled people did not go away and this was always likely to result in an increase in payments at a later time.

    I've been claiming disability benefits for a chronic health condition since late 1989, and I've witnessed many government attempts to reduce the cost of these benefits, essentially by using harsher tests (sometimes described at the time as "helping people back into work").
      
    appears

    I thankfully reached State Pension age before ESA but I remember the torture of unwell and disabled friends on it, the constant reviews and ultimately onto Job Seekers Allowance, when they were clearly incapable of full time work, and this stressful process didn't help.

    Many people with chronic conditions who went through the ESA mill surely eventually applied for disability benefits again, which perhaps goes some way towards explaining the increase in claimants since 2017.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I have been absorbing a few facts and figures, and have reached this conclusion…
    There are 9 million people described as economically inactive. 
    Of these 9 million 2.8 million are economically inactive due to being disabled or having a chronic health conditions.
    Yet there are also 16 million disabled people who do work….so as a percentage, (18.8 divided by 100 x 2.8) 5.2% of the total number of disabled people of working age are unable to work because of their disability/condition.

    Furthermore, there are only 870,000 job vacancies….

    The way the government talks, the way the papers write…the views of much of the general public…



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @DJMH15 I hate the term ' economically inactive ' because there is no such thing.
      People on benefits spend most of the money every month,  which goes back into the economy. 
      Everyone pays tax on utility bills, mobile phone contracts, clothes, petrol etc.  The only thing we don't pay VAT on is groceries. All other food is taxed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The title of this is odd as Incapacity benefit was replaced over a decade ago and I assume the few older people that were left to retire on it done so a long time ago.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Poppy These days they use the term incapacity benefits to mean payments for limited work capability - UC LCWRA and ESA support group. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    "Wealth tax call to hit 75,000 to raise £130 billion over five years to fund UK renewal"

    They don't need to punish the vulnerable if they could just raise the wealth tax
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Ah I guess we are talking about a champagne socialist at the helm. So, it's hard to predict precisely, but I would assume it will be business as usual for wealthy CEOs across the nation.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    I work part time and get pip does anyone know if pip is going to be means tested in the budget if pip is means tested I will lose my pip as I will be classified as earning too much money pip is a lifeline for me as I live on my own 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John They have now said that there won't be any changes to Pip until spring 2025, but that is all they've said, so we are still non the wiser on what their plans are.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John I wonder which darkened mind & heart, acting from the shadows, visits the site here and "thumbs down" comments from those struggling.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @John I am pretty sure I read somewhere last week that it won't be.  A Daily Mirror article I think. Or it could have been an i article.  Have a look about if you are really worried. It could put your mind at rest.
      Also, there was someone from the DWP encouraging pensioners who had lost the winter fuel cost to claim for pip, which I dont think they would do if they were then going to take it away.  It was on a radio 4 program.
      The conservatives had ruled it out, so it would bring big backlash, plus it doesnt help us get into work, as your situation shows.  I am in similar.  I will be dependent on other half instead of independent, and unable to work myself.
      Anyway, if they do decided to means test it, I asked CoPilot, and they said that it would take 18 months to 2 years to start, because it is a different type of legislation to the winter fuel cost, so would need to go through several layers of buraucracy before becoming policy.
      I agree though, it is worrying, not knowing, and wish they would fill us in with more details, or at least rule some of these things out.  
      I hope this helps, try not to worry...I think it will be ok.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    In my experience the WCA has always been an arduous, stress-filled and humiliating process. How more depressing and stringent a process should we expect?

    A man turns up with muscular-skeletal issues effecting mobility, so is handed a pogo stick and asked to vigorously hop along the yard?

    Or, a person with debilitating PTSD is asked to step into an isolation chamber then subjected to random loud noises, a strobe light and taunts from a staff member who specifically targets key psychological vulnerabilities - to gauge heart rate, amygdala activation and cortisone levels?

    What I always found alarming were the notes from the GP and prior assessments were chiefly pushed aside.

    Primary health care providers should always be the first port of call when evidence gathering for claims. An "expert" who has assessed and monitored each of us over a period of time should take precedence over one of the systems "health care professionals" who may or may not like the cut of ones trousers and who may be having a rather difficult morning - making a potentially devastating and life-altering series of decisions after analysing our persona / posture for less than an hour more likely.

    It has been noted that a judge will often meet out a lighter sentence after a hearty lunch and being well rested and that a black defendant in specific states would do well to steer clear of the justice system in that region.

    Our lives are not governed by reason imo; rather we are subject to the whims, prejudices and cockeyed schemes of those who themselves are compromised by the hubris of their own myopic ambition.

    Which isn't to say there aren't "good" people working in government and the DWP - there are, but the rhetoric has been relentlessly bleak for so many years, that it is difficult not to lose heart.

    At this time I have no clear vision of my immediate future or where I will be financially this time next year and for an Autistic man, this uncertainty claws at me daily. There is little in the way of support out there and reaching out for support nowadays is increasingly difficult for me.

    I suppose - what will be will be.




  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    "Unemployed could be given weight-loss jabs to get back to work", says Wes Streeting.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.