Thirty nine Labour MPs have signed a new amendment calling for the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill not to have a second reading.  The number represents a big drop from the almost 130 Labour MPs who signed a similar amendment five days ago, before Labour’s concession to the rebels, and well below the 80+ needed to overturn Labour's majority..

However, it’s likely that there are Labour MPs who have not signed the amendment but who will vote against the bill at its second reading today.

In addition, several Labour MPs have said they intend to vote for the bill or abstain at the second reading.  But if they are not happy with the further information that becomes available over the coming week, they will vote against the bill at its third reading on 9 July.

In total, 66 MPs signed the amendment, from a range of parties.  You can read a full list below.

You can see the full amendment in today’s order papers

 

LABOUR

Rachael Maskell

Neil Duncan-Jordan

Clive Efford

Lorraine Beavers

Chris Hinchliff

Mary Glindon

Cat Eccles

Paula Barker

Cat Smith

Olivia Blake

Peter Lamb

Mr Richard Quigley

Ms Marie Rimmer

Emma Lewell

Richard Burgon

Kate Osborne

Rebecca Long Bailey

Bell Ribeiro-Addy

Jon Trickett

Dr Simon Opher

Ian Lavery

Ian Byrne

Nadia Whittome

Ms Diane Abbott

Kim Johnson

Andy McDonald

Brian Leishman

Imran Hussain

Steve Witherden

Mary Kelly Foy

Clive Lewis

Maureen Burke 

Abtisam Mohamed

Navendu Mishra 

Terry Jermy 

Ms Stella Creasy  

Yasmin Qureshi 

Pam Cox 

Grahame Morris

SNP

Stephen Flynn 

Pete Wishart 

Kirsty Blackman 

Brendan O’Hara 

Stephen Gethins 

Chris Law 

Dave Doogan 

Seamus Logan 

Graham Leadbitter 

INDEPENDENT

Shockat Adam 

Ayoub Khan 

Mr Adnan Hussain 

Iqbal Mohamed 

Jeremy Corbyn

Apsana Begum 

John McDonnell 

Zarah Sultana 

GREEN

Siân Berry 

Carla Denyer

Ellie Chowns

Adrian Ramsay 

PLAID

Liz Saville Roberts 

Ben Lake 

Ann Davies 

Llinos Medi 

ALLIANCE

Sorcha Eastwood  Alliance

SDP

Claire Hanna 

FULL TEXT

That this House, whilst noting the need for the reform of the social security system, and agreeing with the Government’s principles for providing support to people into work and protecting people who cannot work, declines to give a Second Reading to the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill because its provisions have not been subject to a formal consultation with disabled people, or co-produced with them, or their carers; because the Office for Budget Responsibility is not due to publish its analysis of the employment impact of these reforms until the autumn of 2025; because the majority of the additional employment support funding will not be in place until the end of the decade; because while acknowledging protection for current claimants, the Government has yet to produce its own impact assessment on the impact of future claimants of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and Universal Credit limited capability for work and related activity and the number of people, including children, who will fall into poverty or experience worsening mental or physical health as a result, nor how many carers will lose carers allowance; because the Government has not published an assessment of the impact of these reforms on health or care needs; and because the Government is still awaiting the findings of the Minister for Social Security and Disability’s review into the assessment for PIP and Sir Charlie Mayfield’s independent review into the role of employers and government in boosting the employment of disabled people and people with long-term health conditions.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    What's happening in the Commons today?

    11:30am: The chancellor will face questions from MPs, including some on the welfare reforms.

    12:40pm: MPs will begin the debate on the government’s welfare bill. There have been a number of tabled amendments attempting to kill the reforms.

    7pm: A vote is expected on the welfare bill.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Boo Hi Boo

      Thanks for the info on the schedule today!

      Here is to hoping!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    Never be reaccessed again should mean uc lcwra for life not just until 2028 then no protection and be cut off if that happened then that would be a good thing now it just means for another 2 years then that’s it my mp is not on the list no more and they keep harking on about job centre work coach support that just means threats bullying and a sanctions regime 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @Candyman Yes but a new government (which we will inevitably have, as Labour has ensured that) will come up with new changes to welfare anyway. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    This is frustrating. The reasons for the first amendment submitted still stand. Do they know that we might not be protected once new combined assessment comes in. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    And Rachael Maskell - a leading Labour rebel who tabled the amendment - insisted even more are prepared to vote down the cuts than the 39 public signatories.

    “I engaged with so many people yesterday who said I am not signing your reasoned amendment, but I am voting down the bill,” she told the BBC.

    MPs will debate the bill in the Commons from lunchtime before a vote is expected at 7pm.

    So it looks like theres more MPs that will vote against than have signed the amendment.

    Here's the full article:

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    📞 020 7219 3000 telephone number of The House of commons who will put you through to your MP. Last chance to let your MP know what you think.

    I left a message for my MP just now thanking him for the courage to sign the amendment also saying I was sorry to see he had removed his name.  I asked him to please vote against this terrible bill that will leave so many people impoverished in the future.  I also told him that I would be campaigning to have both Liz Kendall and Stephen Timms removed from future processes as they are not fit to hold this office; that as the architects of this disasterous bill they have lost the confidence of the disabled community.




    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Gingin My lib dem mp  charlie maynard isn't, pigheaded man won't even reply to a simple email.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @Gingin Thanks Gingin that's good to hear.  What do you think about campaigning to have Liz and Steven removed? If people can call their MPs and include this either now or later.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @CaroA Well done CaroA. My Lib Dem MP is voting against.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    Rachael Maskell - a leading Labour rebel who tabled the amendment - insisted even more are prepared to vote down the cuts than the 39 public signatories.

    “I engaged with so many people yesterday who said I am not signing your reasoned amendment, but I am voting down the bill,” she told the BBC.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    Well I will be watching the debate today with interest and probably increasing annoyance. As politicians have a tendency to spout nonsense, be disingenuous, be misleading and be obtuse. Rather than knowledgeable, honest, forthcoming and clear. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    https://the.organise.network/surveys/pip-reform-urgent-june-tactics

    Helpful survey to feedback on views today.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    If 70 Labour MPs vote against it wouldn’t take all that many abstentions for the government to lose tintack


    We still have time
    Let’s stay United
    And keep going!

    No regrets
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    Let’s wait & see how many MP’s abstain from voting! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @Boo The MPs should be expelled!

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.