Benefits and Work has obtained details of the conditions which have the highest number of awards with no 4-point or higher descriptors. 

The figures, provided under the Freedom of Information Act, show that Labour's PIP cuts are overwhelmingly aimed at older, but still working age, claimants with physical health conditions, many of whom will have been employed for most of their adult life and many of whom will still be employed.. 

Almost half (46%) of all working age PIP claimants are at risk of losing their award on review from November 2026  

Nearly eight out of ten awards where back pain is the primary disabling condition are at risk under the proposed 4-point or higher rule

This is closely followed by arthritis, where more than three quarters of awards are threatened.

The conditions least likely to lose out are learning disabilities, where only 3% are at risk and autistic spectrum disorders at 6%

These figures only cover working age claimants.  There is a lack of clarity from the DWP about what will happen to pension age claimants from November 2026.

According to these statistics there are a total of 2,795,000 working age PIP claimants and 1,296,000 (46%) are at risk of losing their award on review from November 2026.

 

Rank

Health condition category

Volume of PIP Claimants in receipt of Daily Living component

Claimants awarded less than 4 points in all daily living activities

Volume in each condition group

Proportion in each condition group

1

Back pain

194,000

154,000

79%

2

Arthritis

279,000

214,000

77%

3

Other Regional Musculoskeletal Diseases

136,000

97,000

71%

4

Chronic pain syndromes

173,000

118,000

68%

5

Cardiovascular diseases

61,000

38,000

62%

6

Respiratory diseases

83,000

45,000

55%

7

Anxiety and depression

587,000

282,000

48%

8

Multiple sclerosis and neuropathic diseases

80,000

38,000

48%

9

All other conditions

272,000

126,000

46%

10

Other neurological diseases

97,000

35,000

36%

11

Cerebrovascular disease

56,000

19,000

34%

12

Cancer

70,000

23,000

33%

13

Epilepsy

36,000

11,000

30%

14

Other psychiatric disorders

90,000

25,000

28%

15

Cerebral Palsy and Neurological Muscular Diseases

47,00

11,000

24%

16

Psychotic disorders

112,000

26,000

23%

17

ADHD/ADD

75,000

14,000

19%

18

Autistic spectrum disorders

206,000

13,000

6%

19

Learning disabilities

188,000

7,000

3%

DWP Notes

Health condition category is based on primary health condition as recorded on the PIP Computer System at time of latest assessment. Many claimants have multiple health conditions but only primary condition is available for analysis.

Only the 18 disabling condition groups which make up the highest proportions of the PIP caseload are displayed in this table.

Other disabling condition groups which cover smaller proportions of the PIP caseload are covered in the "Other Conditions" category. This includes:

  • Visual Diseases
  • Other General Musculoskeletal Diseases
  • Endocrine Diseases
  • Hearing Disorders
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases
  • Genitourinary Diseases
  • Skin Diseases
  • Autoimmune Diseases (Connective Tissue Disorders)
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Diseases of the Liver, Gallbladder or Biliary Tract
  • Haematological Diseases
  • Metabolic Diseases
  • Multisystem and Extremes of Age
  • Diseases of the Immune System

Anxiety and Depression includes the following conditions recorded in the PIP Stat Xplore data:

  • Anxiety disorders - Other / type not known
  • Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
  • Stress reaction disorders - Other / type not known
  • Generalised anxiety disorder
  • Phobia - Specific
  • Phobia - Social
  • Agoraphobia
  • Panic disorder
  • Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)
  • Anxiety and depressive disorders - mixed
  • Conversion disorder (hysteria)
  • Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD)
  • Dissociative disorders - Other / type not known
  • Somatoform disorders - Other / type not known
  • Depressive disorder
  • Bipolar affective disorder (Hypomania / Mania)
  • Mood disorders - Other / type not known

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Thank you Cecilia and thank you Frances
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Can someone help to clear up a massive worry for my friend,he has just had a review on his pip claim and been awarded 10yr so basically until 2035. Will he have to be reassessed under the new rules if they come in from nov 26 or will he be left alone until 2035 unless his condition changes.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @robbie "Should really stop worrying" ???
      Oh yeah cos that's possible 🙄
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Sonia. I am have just got the same award in FEB I expect to be left alone until then As what the DWP want is to have claims that they see they could end more easily Plus why review someone who has only just been reviewed When other reviews are more pressing to be done
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Sonia. chances are he will be left alone, they have a lot of back log, and are concentrating on the PIp that ends now, and in the next few years.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Thank you phantom down voter.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Sonia. He should be left alone until his award ends in 2035.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    I got pip for ten years I scored a total of 45 points at my assessment I don't know if I should worry or not I'm due in 2029 for my light touch assessment I can't get my head around it 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Dai You must have got 4 points in more than one category to receive that score. Please don't worry. x
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Dai @Dai, Well if you don't get through ok we're all done for!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    There will be concessions. Previously I did mention the lower daily living tier if DLA as a possible compromise. Not popular I know, but the Govt could argue that it's listening to the concerns of their MP's and ensuring there is still financial support for the disabled. Reeves will hate it (would she resign?) Much will depend on the local election results -;get out there and vote.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Ilo I’m still getting DLA both parts enhanced and for life - not had the migration invite to PIP but did CAB assessment and would still get enhanced in both components- trying not to get worked up as I’m just migrating from ESA to UC because it was requested. I figure one step at a time especially as they are gearing up to do more complex surgery on me - have left it all with my MP 🤔watch this space . . .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Anon Exactly that. Love or loath the WCA, it is desperate for a separate benefit and should remain that way.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Matt DLA shouldn't have been scrapped imho. All to save money. People had lifetime awards when which were removed. Those people could have been left alone and money not wasted on PIP reassessing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Anon A Should read scrapping cbesa ,don't know where the" not" came from
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anon @Anon not forget no 4 Kier Stammer resigns and he takes Rachel Reeves with him
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Wish everyone the best. I'm going to take some time out, getting a little frustrated with posts not being accepted, plus nothing much more to add that hasn't already been said.  Just an anxious waiting game like before, and like before I don't hold out too much hope. I was right last time, hope I'm wrong this time though. Always a chance albeit pretty slim. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @MJ I know what you mean about no posts MJ 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    With the legislation for the latest assault on the disabled coming in to force in June, I am confused as to whether those currently awaiting a PIP review decision- very often months or even over a year- will they be assessed under the new or current criteria? Can anybody give me a concrete answer on this? I sent my PIP review form back 3 months ago and I don’t expect a decision before June. Will I be now be assessed using the new criteria? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @SLB My husband's in the same boat
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @David No you will be reassessed using the old criteria the new criteria won't come into affect until November 2026.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @David They don't come into force in June.  That's when it will go to the Commons - if nothing changes.  But the changes to eligibility to PIP won't start until November 2026.  Presumably that will be for claims submitted or reassessments generated AFTER that date.  So, in my case, I should get my reassessment form in Novemebr or December 2026, which means I'll be one of the first under the new rules...if I don't generate a reassessment myself beforehand by saying my condition has changed!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @David @David, the legislation will not come into force in June, that's just when the vote is. IF those new criteria are passed, they are scheduled to come into force in November 2026. I'd say any reviews started before then would be under the old rules, but that's just my feeling. There will probably be a load of dispute about which claims are affected. You should be through under the old rules, though.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @David Changes aren’t planned to happen until Nov so I think you’ll be assessed on the current criteria 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @keepingitreal The only surefire prediction about the OBR is their predictions are wildly off the mark.

      Their doom-mongering is not in our favour. It's them that are wanting the cuts. 

      As an example of their uselessness, last October the OBR forecast a 2% growth in the economy for 2025. Then they realised they'd forgotten to factor in higher N.I. and other tax rises. Two weeks ago that figure was revised to 1 per cent.

      They have no say in whether or not a vote in Parliament is delayed.

      Liz Truss is right. Non accountable unelected quangos, NGOs and The Blob which are actually running the country rather than the government and that are costing £millions need to go. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Dave Sounds like there will be some fun coming up.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout WorkshyLayabout It doesn't matter what the OBR says, we want the vote delayed. We can challenge the OBR's findings if necessary, just as we can challenge the government's flawed thinking. If the OBR is doom mongering about the cuts, though, that would be to our advantage. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout A few weeks ago a bookies on the radio were predicting Stammer will be gone within a few months. Granted a few moths is a long time! Tom + I are keeping a close eye on Labour front benches. Forget the back benches. The entertainment is in the front benches. Angela Raynor, Lucy Powell + Ed Millband have threatened to resign if these cuts go through, read that in Manchester Evening News. If Angela Raynor goes that is the end of Stammer. Lucy Powell is our local MP + she is good. Tom + I cant see either Angela Raynor or Lucy Powell going quietly, they will probably kick off in Parliament + there will be a floor show in that house.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Old mother Been reading loads of posts + everyone trying to 2nd guess which way the back benches + the opposition parties will vote. But everyone is ignoring the front benches. Forget all the other MPs + it is irrelevant how they vote. We are watching the front benches that is where it's going to all kick off. Angela Raynor, Lucy Powell + Ed Millband have all threatened to resign if these cuts go through. If Angela Raynor goes that is the end of Stammer. Lucy Powell is our local MP + she is good 👍  If Angela Raynor + Lucy Powell resign, they will not go quietly. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago

    Welcome news this morning in The Observer article  by Toby Helm Political Editor.
     ‘The whole policy is wrong’: rebellion among Labour MPs grows over £5bn benefits cut. 

    Happy Easter 🐣 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Elle Hi Elle

      I have also read that article! 

      Good to Post something positive.

      Happy Easter to you also!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    The conditions Kinnock warned against before Thatcher was elected in 1983:

    "I warn you not to be ordinary, I warn you not to be young, I warn you not to fall ill, and I warn you not to grow old"

    Thank goodness we now have a Labour government 🙄
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @keepingitreal Have you heard who is now leading the Labour Party, Stammer + Rachel Reeves + they totally oppose what Labour did stand for + now they are very busy making that Party unelectable. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @keepingitreal I detect a hint of sarcasm there? perhaps?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    An old opinion article in the herald but one nonetheless just as poignant today in the face of the government minister's propaganda sound bites we hear today! As usual the poor are the undeserving they are the underworld of criminals and of stories of one person used to represent the masses as being the underserving. What I would say to anyone is don't have the misfortune of falling ill or becoming disabled or having an accident for you will be indeed tar and feathered the same way by our "deserving" and "honest" politicians in much the same manner as they did then and they do now!

    https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/13099218.benefit-cuts-devil-detail/ 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @James Mick philpot
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @James if you copy the entire url and then past it in the address bar of the browser it appears so the click does not!  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @James Sorry the article has now disappeared but it was about comparing the onslaught made by George Osborne in 2013 and using the story of Phil Philpot who killed  his family in an attempt to get a new home and trying to place the blame on his ex wife and bullying them off their wages.  Everyone on benefits was made out to be a villain like Phil Philpot, as are a few cheats in the system are used to scandalise disabled and sick, or using someone who wins on the basis of their human rights to make out that human rights is also bad and therefore has no place in our society. Sorry the actual article is gone when I had a look just now 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
     Yahoo news Welfare system ‘needs sorting out’, says former council leader

    People can go read it themself .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Lill Hi Lill, I did read the whole thing and it said the opposite. I’ve changed the text to bold for clarity: 

      THE Liberal Democrats have criticised the Labour group for not supporting their motion….[paragraphs taken out for clarity]which called on the council leader to write to the Chancellor and the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to express the council’s ‘grave concerns’ about the impact of these changes and to urge for a ‘reverse’ of the ‘decision to target those with disabilities and health condition with cuts to their support payments’.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    Happy bloody easter folks.  yet again please  our delightful government do it again?!!. They always dish out the good news when you are maybe aloud out for family time. No we are not
    aloud to get peace of mind in any shape or form. We've been dangled on a thread for months now, it's OK they will kill us off  before they manage to get life sort, then they wounder why
    People are so ill mentally and physically BECAUSE YOU KEEP US THERE. When it comes to filling out forms and they want to know  your In and out goings it's I
    Possible to give them a truthful answer,? Because we have no idea our selfs. It's crazy i know
    Tell them go ask the government if they can't answer  you then iam as sure as hell like how you 
    Expect us to no. Life is tough. enough . Get out into the real world and see how  majority  have to live and dont forget
    you have that huge hidden.pot of money you have that would   cover  and then some . So glad someone  could spill the beans before  being.  Carted off 
















    .





  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    @Cmjdexter, odd that they said they used information from your Universal Credit assessment when you don't get it. 

    Also odd that you weren't given a ten year award when your next review falls after state pension age.

    I'm interested to know how they were able to reduce two 4 point descriptors to 3 points - which were they?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Cmjdexter There isn't a score of 3 points for dressing. It's either 2 or 4.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Cmjdexter j@Cmjdexter, thanks for getting back to me. Maybe the ESA does explain the reference to UC. I'm still baffled by the two downgrades from 4 to 3 with your points, because, as far as I know, there is only one 3 point descriptor - Activity 4e, which is presumably what you were scored for washing and bathing. However, you can't score 3 for dressing and undressing, so is this a mistake, or is this some new assessment we're looking at that we don't know about?

      Let's hope anyway that by the time you're reviewed these green paper proposals have been properly crushed!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @sara One was bathing, the other dressing. I thought that a bit strange about the seven years. I get new style ESA so that might be what they actually mean but never have had any universal credit.
      Thanks for replying 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    https://sites.google.com/view/openletterdisabilitybenefits/home

    Please sign and share with MPs
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Anniesmum MP John McDonnell has signed the letter and sent it to people he knows. He seems a wonderful MP. If only all the others were the same! Genuinely caring person.
      Please share and sign letter with medical people and sign and share yourselves if you want to.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    One more thing before I disappear for a few days: there's a little video on my YouTube channel that you are welcome to share on social media or elsewhere if you'd like.  It's very basic, but tries to get the truth out there while showing why this is everyone's problem and not just ours.  It can be found at the link below. 

    ?si=ID4J3ZRZ0YaJmGLf 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @SLB Thanks, this is great. I reposted it
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Slb Thanks Sib. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @robbie Thanks.
      The song is Maybe We Can Get It Together by Bobby Darin.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @SLB Gosh, @SLB, that's moving. Wouldn't it be amazing if we could get Gareth Malone to lead a choir of disabled people performing that song with the video playing behind? We could have a protest anthem here. I don't know, just an idea, I can't do stuff, but surely somebody can. This needs to go viral.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    OK.  I'm away from here for a few days.  I think it's important that we all remember that there is still life outside of these worries (for now).  It's surprising how much time all of this can take up, and how all-consuming this can be.  It's still two years at least before any of this affects us.  Yes, they say November 2026, but anyone who begins their reassessment in November 2026 won't get a decision until mid 2027!

    That said, there's still those glimmers of sunlight in all of this.  So, I'll leave you for the weekend with my positive reminders:
    The Guardian's news story about the possibility of abstaining in the commons vote shows that Labour are getting a bit rattled.

    The same story states the commons vote will be in June, not May.  It gives us more time.

    The May elections will allow us to give Labour a damn good kicking, and may get MPs frightened of losing their seats in the future. 

    There are still numerous news outlets still running stories on the cuts, including the Guardian, Big Issue, Yahoo News etc.  A good outcome considering MPs have gone home for the recess.

    There are lots of protests popping up all over the country.  Small scale, most of them, but the one in Norwich is how I'll be spending one of my Saturdays in May!

    A BBC news story I didn't see on here, so thought I'd post it:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr7848d8y0ko

    We found out this week that up to 200 Labour MPs have more disabled people in their constituencies than their majority.  In other words, if every disabled person votes against Labour, they'll be ousted at the next election.

    Various charities are still running their own petitions and questionaires.  

    Enjoy Easter. :)


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @SLB Thanks SLB. Gives me some hope.
      Shall do what you suggest.
      I am London based. Shall definitely be joining a campaign.
      Am on crutches but it won’t stop me from marching.
      Together we are strong.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    The government is offering MPs and Ministers to abstain. I really hope they do not and they vote against the government. "While good men stand idly by evil men(woman) do their deeds" certainly will apply and abstaining will make them just as guilty!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Yup Sadly there is no local elections in my area this year.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @James If they obstain or not, Labour has already lost the next General Election.  They need to get rid Stammer, Rachel Reeves  + Kendall; those 3 are making the Labour Party unelectable. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Mick I would opt for Cornish autonomy from Westminster's corruption:) At least it is left leaning and perhaps these so called one nation types need a good wake up call because of their centralised autocracy
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Yup No Labour optiion on the ballot paper where I am anyway so I cannot vote against them.  Choice of lib dem, tory, reform or Mebyon Kernow.  Not even a green candidate.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @James Please make sure you all vote in the local elections.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    I imagine Kendall and co won’t be happy that so few autistic ppl will be caught out and the research timms is heading will conveniently axe or tweak certain descriptors (it’s only because of ‘mm vs Secretary of State’ ruling that many of us with autism have a 4pointer - I hope as a judge/tribunal forced the dwp to make that positive change to descriptors it will be difficult for Kendall/timms to rewrite or axe it)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @D I thought the government were interested in getting people with autism into work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    Hi ALL

    It appears that we now have to be cautious about what we are answering on any petitions and surveys!

    MP's penalized if they abstain on one issue but then basically bribed to abstain from another matter (re welfare reforms)!

    I concur with Angela who has posted on the site that if MP's abstain from a vote that will be EQUALLY as bad. As then it will leave just the majority who have voted which will determine basically the fate of the disabled, sick, mentally ill. 

    However, what we have to bear in mind is that even if our local MP's abstain for fear of losing local seats in their area then they DO NOT DESERVE to be voted for EITHER.

    Which will mean that if they abstain then it would be the majority that have voted.

    TORIES, REFORM, LIB DEMS ALL SEEM TO BE IN FAVOR OF THE REFORMS!

    It is as if whatever we do they will throw something else at us!

    Whatever we say will be turned back on you NO MATTER WHERE YOU SAY IT OR HOW YOU SAY IT. THEY HAVE ALREADY PREEMPTED IT AND THEY WILL NOT ANSWER IT JUST DEFLECT FROM IT.

    SKILLED JOURNALISTS AND ACADEMICS HAVE HAD TO TOLERATE THEIR DOWNRIGHT IGNORANCE AND INSOLENCE.

    I AGREE AT THE MOMENT TELL THEM TO MIND THEIR OWN BUSINESS. 

    Normally, I would state to just write cost of Care, added electric and gas, water, due to disabilities, expensive equipment wheelchairs and ALL other mobility aids to include specialized added cost of services such as  washing and ironing,  (AS AGENCY CARE WORKERS WILL NOT DO THAT ANYMORE!)
    Gardener etc..,!

    However, they WILL just start to question the legitimate support and equipment that you have to pay out for. 

    They WILL just continue to keep on moving the goal post to suit their aim.

    I think this is WHY a lot of disability charities NOW have refused to enter into any form of communication with Starmer, Kendall, Reeves and Co.. Since the Green paper proposals. 

    Whereas before they were in communication with them. Because there was/is a realization that whatever they stated about sick, disabled mental health and work has FACT been misconstrued. To suit the agenda. 


    Then this Government has USED that information to be ready and waiting for it to be used in these reforms. Whether or NOT certain entities are regretting it now or NOT who knows. 

    However, the HARM is already done. Maybe they thought that reform was needed but now realize that it has gone FAR TOO FAR! When they engaged behind our backs with this Government.

    This IS what we are ALL up against.

    Now they are marking down PIP points in recent assessments, compared to what was awarded the last time. As Cmjdexter has posted on the site. 

    ALL LOOK AT YOUR MEDICATIONS THAT YOU ARE PRESCRIBED FOR WHATEVER YOUR CONDITIONS. THERE WILL BE PRINTED ON THEM WHAT THE SIDE EFFECTS ARE OR WHETHER OR NOT YOU CAN DRIVE OR OPERATE MACHINERY. I KNOW THIS MAY SOUND STUPID TO SOME OF YOU ON THE SITE! WHAT I AM TRYING TO GET AT HERE. HOWEVER, WE HAVE GOT TO START LOOKING AT ANY HEALTH AND SAFETY LAWS THAT THESE PROPOSALS WILL BE IN CONTRAVENTION OF. THEY SEEM TO BE TOTALLY DISREGARDING THE EQUALITY ACT 2010 AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. THEREFORE WE HAVE TO START LOOKING AT OTHER LAWS THAT INDICATES WHAT A HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK THAT YOU ARE IN ADDITION TO THE DISABILITIES, CONDITIONS, ILL-HEALTH THAT PREVENTING YOU 'SAFELY AND RELIABLY' FROM BEING ABLE TO WORK. 

    THIS IS ALL UNLAWFUL EVERY LAST BIT OF IT BUT I DO NOT KNOW WHERE OR HOW THEY CAN BE STOPPED.
    THROUGH ANY LEGAL REMEDIES.

    THE CASUALTIES TO THIS THUS FAR ARE ENORMOUS, IT HAS EXACERBATED ALL OF US AND THE VERY SERIOUS CONDITIONS THAT WE ALL LIVE WITH. THE CASUALTIES IF THIS BILL IS PASSED DOES NOT EVEN BEAR THINKING ABOUT. 




    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Gingjn You have your opinion and I have mine!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Gingjn Tim me partner read that Ed Davey of Lib Dems his son is disabled and these cuts could harm him, so are the Lib Dems Mps likely to vote for something that could effect their own leader?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @DJ I’m not sure you’re right about the Lib Dems supporting these reforms. My MP has said there’s significant concern about the proposals in the party and others have opposed them, as was highlighted by another poster on this site. I’m not saying go vote Lib Dems, I’m just not sure that what you’ve said about them being in favour of the reforms is accurate. As Ed Davey’s election campaign was a lot around the plight of carers I think they might well have serious concerns around the reforms. I know my own Lib Dem MP does. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    A comment via Scope.

    Money bills can be used to adjust payment amounts (freeze, increase, or cut benefits like Universal Credit) because they focus on spending. What they can't do is change who qualifies, how claims are assessed, or the conditions for receiving benefits. While money bills can tweak payments, major reforms require full legislation.

    Most welfare reforms involve both financial changes and rule modifications, which is why they usually need primary legislation, not just a money bill.

    If the government wants to alter eligibility, assessments, or conditions, it must use primary legislation, which takes longer as MPs and Lords debate and vote on it.

    You asked what we can do, all of us can continue to contact MPs, ministers, and organisations. This is important for raising awareness and pressuring decision-makers before these changes become law. It’s important to highlight how these changes could push many people into poverty, as policymakers need to understand the human consequences, not just the financial savings.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.