Benefits and Work has obtained details of the conditions which have the highest number of awards with no 4-point or higher descriptors. 

The figures, provided under the Freedom of Information Act, show that Labour's PIP cuts are overwhelmingly aimed at older, but still working age, claimants with physical health conditions, many of whom will have been employed for most of their adult life and many of whom will still be employed.. 

Almost half (46%) of all working age PIP claimants are at risk of losing their award on review from November 2026  

Nearly eight out of ten awards where back pain is the primary disabling condition are at risk under the proposed 4-point or higher rule

This is closely followed by arthritis, where more than three quarters of awards are threatened.

The conditions least likely to lose out are learning disabilities, where only 3% are at risk and autistic spectrum disorders at 6%

These figures only cover working age claimants.  There is a lack of clarity from the DWP about what will happen to pension age claimants from November 2026.

According to these statistics there are a total of 2,795,000 working age PIP claimants and 1,296,000 (46%) are at risk of losing their award on review from November 2026.

 

Rank

Health condition category

Volume of PIP Claimants in receipt of Daily Living component

Claimants awarded less than 4 points in all daily living activities

Volume in each condition group

Proportion in each condition group

1

Back pain

194,000

154,000

79%

2

Arthritis

279,000

214,000

77%

3

Other Regional Musculoskeletal Diseases

136,000

97,000

71%

4

Chronic pain syndromes

173,000

118,000

68%

5

Cardiovascular diseases

61,000

38,000

62%

6

Respiratory diseases

83,000

45,000

55%

7

Anxiety and depression

587,000

282,000

48%

8

Multiple sclerosis and neuropathic diseases

80,000

38,000

48%

9

All other conditions

272,000

126,000

46%

10

Other neurological diseases

97,000

35,000

36%

11

Cerebrovascular disease

56,000

19,000

34%

12

Cancer

70,000

23,000

33%

13

Epilepsy

36,000

11,000

30%

14

Other psychiatric disorders

90,000

25,000

28%

15

Cerebral Palsy and Neurological Muscular Diseases

47,00

11,000

24%

16

Psychotic disorders

112,000

26,000

23%

17

ADHD/ADD

75,000

14,000

19%

18

Autistic spectrum disorders

206,000

13,000

6%

19

Learning disabilities

188,000

7,000

3%

DWP Notes

Health condition category is based on primary health condition as recorded on the PIP Computer System at time of latest assessment. Many claimants have multiple health conditions but only primary condition is available for analysis.

Only the 18 disabling condition groups which make up the highest proportions of the PIP caseload are displayed in this table.

Other disabling condition groups which cover smaller proportions of the PIP caseload are covered in the "Other Conditions" category. This includes:

  • Visual Diseases
  • Other General Musculoskeletal Diseases
  • Endocrine Diseases
  • Hearing Disorders
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases
  • Genitourinary Diseases
  • Skin Diseases
  • Autoimmune Diseases (Connective Tissue Disorders)
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Diseases of the Liver, Gallbladder or Biliary Tract
  • Haematological Diseases
  • Metabolic Diseases
  • Multisystem and Extremes of Age
  • Diseases of the Immune System

Anxiety and Depression includes the following conditions recorded in the PIP Stat Xplore data:

  • Anxiety disorders - Other / type not known
  • Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
  • Stress reaction disorders - Other / type not known
  • Generalised anxiety disorder
  • Phobia - Specific
  • Phobia - Social
  • Agoraphobia
  • Panic disorder
  • Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)
  • Anxiety and depressive disorders - mixed
  • Conversion disorder (hysteria)
  • Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD)
  • Dissociative disorders - Other / type not known
  • Somatoform disorders - Other / type not known
  • Depressive disorder
  • Bipolar affective disorder (Hypomania / Mania)
  • Mood disorders - Other / type not known

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Please do not vote for Reform. These people will be even worse than Labour on benefits.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Dave Sorry, not all my comment sent. The third part should read: 

      “You could do with actually posting a link to a quote because that doesn’t align with what Tice has been saying and how certain news outlets perceive him. I would like to think him saying he will not be voting for the cuts would be quoted somewhere.”
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Dave
      Why should we vote for Reform when the Greens are right there and have promised a wealth tax? Unless Reform have promised the same thing, I ain’t interested. I want actual reassurance that the right people will be paying for their policies and not those on benefits or a low wage. Because money for the welfare state needs to come from somewhere.

      You could do with actually posting a link to a quote because that doesn’t align with what Tice has been saying and 

      And no, him just being critical of the WFA being means-tested isn’t good enough for me. I’ve seen plenty of people criticise that while also arguing that we deserve to have our benefits cut.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Anon What are you trying to do? Keep this lot of idiots in government, to continue their stupidity. Reform leader a few days ago was on our local radio + he was critical of the Labour plans + promised he would not be voting for the cuts. He was also very critical about the way this government took away the elderly winter fuel allowance.  When you are posting misinformation like that, you could be helping to keep this bunch of clowns in government. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Jamie "Reform NEVER stated disabled people were parasites. It was a journalist who was quoted as saying that."

      Said journalist is the wife of Reform party's deputy, as Dez pointed out (interesting how you chose to overlook that). There's that old bit about how those you choose to associate with reflect upon you and your views. You can disagree, but I also think it very much applies to your partner as well.

      Personally, I don't want anyone who chooses to cohabitate with somebody who refers to disabled people as 'parasites' to be my deputy PM but you do you, son.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @James I wouldn't mind but this has all been common knowledge for nearly a year now. Whatever isn't incredibly alarming (i.e. that people have four months to find a job or their benefits get cut) is just downright vague. They say they want to do something but then they don't explain how exactly or where the money is going to come from. 

      I'd also like to see some proof of Reform being more progressive than what's in this article from Jamie because cutting people off benefits after just four months - even if they are fit for work - is just morally inexcusable. You're not automatically gaming the system just because you haven't found a job in four months. My cousin works at a Jobcentre, and they say a lot of people wait for several months just to get an interview. It's often not the fault of jobseekers, that's just how the job market is at the moment.

      Also, finding a part-time job or a job where the hours are suited for your disabilities probably won't fly with them either because Richard Tice pretty much said in that interview that Dez linked (because it helps to actually listen to these things before commenting on them, Jamie) that such a thing is a 'structural problem in the benefits system'. He says that it apparently "pays more" to only work 16 hours a week and claim benefits while ignoring the reasons why one would only work part time and claim benefits. Such as disabilities preventing them from working full time.

      A lot of this just reads like the Reform party are riding on the perception that living on benefits is incredibly lucrative and preferable to having a full-time job when we know this to be completely untrue. We shouldn't be voting for people who want to rewrite reality and paint us as "living it large" on benefits just so they can scapegoat us for the country's financial issues and fleece us just like Labour is doing right now. Like somebody else has said: it's like voting for the wolf because the dog bit you.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Always thought after green paper this government wanted to get gone the standard rates of pip also in 2030 wouldn’t surprise me if they abolished the pip benefit altogether and keep the disabled needs to outsource it to local councils to care for disabled . Hopefully these proposals will get challenged and watered down but all can all do is hope and dwp have a duty to care and treat disabled people with dignity and respect their complex conditions otherwise I think there will be a lot of deaths on their hands and a lot of human rights law being broken (disabled act 2010) lets all stick together with the help of this site and other charitie sites just maybe there will be a fair end to all this stress and anxiety which all inflames our mental and physical disability’s 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @diceman24 Let’s just hope everyone has the strength to Appeal, the Gov will pay a power of £££’s if we do. I am preparing, even this early. I am 69 so no idea what will happen to me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @lesley Sorry. Try again.. Didn’t the government try something similar with Disability Living Allowance? Instead of giving cash payments they suggested replacing it with other types of provision. Never going to work.
      Local councils  are all overworked and not enough staff.
      N.H.S. underfunded and overwhelmed.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @diceman24 Didn’t the government try something similar with Disability Living Allowance? Instead of giving cash they suggested replacing regular cash payments with other types of provision. Never

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I’m getting more and more angry about the government doing this, I have been writing to the relevant people. I’m just feeling so so mad what is happening in this country.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Terrified chronic argophbia and now they going say got for work and cannot leave house I wake up shaking 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Na I hear you, cronic agoraphobic with panic disorder and ptsd,I'm in a mess right now over this,my mh is completely shot,panic attacks at home now and In the night aswell,it's destroyed me,it won't change my ability to work,infact I was closer to work b4 these announcements as I had slowly started to move away from my front door,not now!! these people don't understand and don't want to understand mental health 🙄 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Na If you are anything like me, you wouldn't even make it to the job centre, let alone a job interview.
      I struggle with even online things, especially if more than 1 to 1 and that's hard enough.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I hear via varies newspaper reports, that the consultations for pip are an absolute joke. They aren't even discussing the pip cuts at them. Surely, this can be picked up legally as the consultations aren't being carried out properly?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @tintack According to the CAB there are 6 legal challenges already started on Labours plans + it hasn't even gone through parliament yet. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Anon I did see something on a Youtube channel a few days ago which said that there are a number of solicitors who are looking at ways to mount a legal challenge. Whether that's because the most damaging changes are not included in the consultation I don't know, but it would be surprising to say the least if that were not part of it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Pj That’s exactly what I’ve been thinking, though I haven’t seen anything mentioned yet about a legal challenge. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    To get rid of daily daily living as those left will be on enhanced, what's next? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Anon* People on enhanced DL will lose even more than low rate DL - the 4-point rule applies just the same. I have enhanced DL but my highest score is 3 points. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Scorpion Abolition of the sick and disabled. Don't put anything past this government.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Anon* "what's next?"

      Abolition of sickness and disability benefits, I guess!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Despite only 250,000 being asked if they can work and not to the wider public and how many individuals were in the report saying they were not able to work. While its already been reported that 250,000 will be thrown into poverty, then what happens with the other 6/700,000?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Including people that already work and may lose their job because the need PIP! Why weren't they able to cut the health element and leave PIP alone! PIP is already a nightmare to claim and it's ongoing with assessments.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Anon Anon you obviously have no disability issues to make such a post. Have you ever thought of stopping for a minute + think: it could so easily happen to you or someone you love, could get hit by a bus today + ruin the rest of your life. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Anon I'm also set to lose everything cbesa pip and carers 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout I'd prefer to have £200 from Esa cut than be thrown into poverty and lose everything! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Anon Absolutely thoughtless. You seriously think it's OK for a great many people who cannot work at all to lose the £423.27 a month health element of UC? It will please you to know it is being cut - to £0.00. No PIP, no LCWRA.

      The health element is already a nightmare to claim and it's ongoing with assessments.

      You ought to justify your bullshit. 

      Statements like yours make me hit the roof.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    they are liars a joke and not fit for office i'll never vote labour again they are worse then the tories in so many ways andf don't care about people's lives and well being
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Ds Unfortunately, they don't care if you don't vote for them again. Likely be governed by some other outfit in a few years . Not any we know of currently.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    This is what happens when people who are not disabled nor are medical experts try and put disabilities in a vacuum and try and narrow it down the symptoms and the experience of being disabled to the most stereotypical, ignorant, discriminatory image that they have on the topic: real people with real, serious conditions that are hard to fabricate and live with will get hurt.  

    The government has this idea that people with disabilities must live in their own filth and be barely functioning 24/7 in order to count as disabled. When, in actual fact, we can live full and ordinary lives when we're not being hassled by ableist politicians and taxpayers who get the biggest victim complex imaginable because the old lady with arthritis at number 57 had a good day out of the hundreds beforehand and was able to walk the dog for several metres.

    And this is why this list has come out like it has. Wait, you mean to tell me that cancer patients aren't enjoying a weekend break in Whitby Bay when they're not having radiation pumped into their body?? What an absolutely preposterous idea. This doesn't align with my stereotypical view of cancer patients at all so - clearly - they must be faking! The system must be reformed and the PIP assessment must be rewritten - stat!

    Good god. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @C shepherd Make you right very rare that medical board who consultants are under go against each other. Like one Freemason going against another Freemason 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Dez Please don't apologise Dez you're right in so many ways.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Dez Another type of example : 

      "The bloke who lives down the end of our street gets £500,000 a month in benefits. He claims he can't work, but he's moonlighting for cash in hand. Doesn't pay a penny in tax. He's just been to Dubai for two weeks and stayed in a £7,000 a night top-of-the-range luxury hotel. Oh yeah, he flew there in his OWN PRIVATE JET!!!"

      I find it curious how someone can know more about a benefits claimant than their own friends and family. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @C shepherd In an ideal world, they absolutely shouldn't. But we unfortunately have a government that feels anybody who doesn't fit their very limited definition of 'disabled' can and should work, regardless of their diagnosis. 

      I've seen the same rhetoric from taxpayers. "Oh, my niece's boyfriend's brother lost both arms in the Army and is blind in one eye and he can perform backflips and he works a 9-5 job, why can't these lazy scroungers also work??" and OK, good for them if you haven't completely made this up but disabled individuals aren't a monolith and no condition affects the same person in the exact same way. Human psychology just doesn't work like that.

      As a sidenote: I always love how they try and use other disabled individuals as a trump card against those who cannot work and yet they go ominously quiet when you point out that they're actually describing somebody with genuine issues having to struggle because the society we live in demands that they do so. 

      And these ableist individuals are demented enough to paint it as an inspirational story just because this disabled person they claim to know or have completely fabricated is their 'ideal' version of the disabled and one we should aspire to live by: somebody who just shrugs and gets on with life just so they don't cost them any of their precious tax money. It honestly makes me sick and I also feel them having to walk a single day in our shoes wouldn't be enough of a life lesson for them. 

      My apologies for the rant. I just despair at how heartless and bigoted some people can be over disabled people having to scrape by on so much a month. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Dez I don't think that people who have been seen diagnosed and had proper specialist procedures tests exrays ct scans with medical professionals and  written proof they have these conditions should have their diagnosis  ignored when they have the awards for them now.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @James I read the Consultation doc and Labour’s plans go much, much further. Off the top of my head, they are going back to pre-Covid levels of face-2-face assessments AND that ALL assessments are videoed, for everyone. All unemployed benefits are being scrapped and replaced by Universal Unemployment, about £135/wk with a cap at 6 months, and that’s your lot! Any employed person who thinks they can fall back on support if they lose their jobs, and there will be many, may for the first time in their lives, face a grim time.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    So, for all their waffle about it trying to get the young into work, and to stop the young from claiming for anxiety, the most hit conditions are actually physical ones that generally (although not exclusively) affect the middle-aged and elderly.  So yet more lies from the Labour govt.  And they must know that things like back pain and arthritis affect all parts of our lives equally rather than being particularly bad in one element of our daily routines.  So this is all intentional.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Your right workshylayabout my friend has had money stopped because of not sending enough bank statements in they asked for 3 they got 5 then said they need more so stopped there money just like that unbelievable so he has to wait while they review the statements how convenient of them 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Hi

      This is what I was getting at when we were all commenting on this site over the 'bogus green paper consultations'

      When Starmer, Kendall, Reeves and co., were stating that 'It was about the young'

      NOT SO, they have KNOWN all along which categories that they were REALLY targeting,  and I KNEW for a FACT that the statistics that this site has revealed confirms that IF these proposals go ahead the harm is going to be enormous. It does NOT bear thinking about it, but unfortunately, we are having to think about it.

      There is still a lot more that is to be revealed. IF these proposals go ahead and I FEAR that we are going to learn of a lot more consultations' that have been going on without our knowledge. 












    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Of course not.  But I'm referring to the government's narrative being a lie.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Spot on.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @SLB Yes they are liars and their propaganda is full of holes which is a good thing as the best thing to do is expose the big lie. They will be long remembered for the incompetent playing around with those points in PIP as it will open them up to charges of being incompetent as well as liars for a long time even after they have left office. I for one will not shed a tear when the high and mighty have fallen