Disabled claimants who have been hit with a big increase in their council tax liability after migrating from employment and support allowance (ESA) to universal credit (UC) may be able to get their money back, following a court victory this month.

Readers hit
For months, Benefits and Work has been hearing from readers who, contrary to everything they were promised by the DWP, have found themselves much worse off after migrating to UC because their council tax bill has shot up:

 “… my council says they don't give 100% council tax benefit to people on universal credit like they do people on ESA so I have to pay 55% of my council tax, about £80 a month. So I am far worse off.” Tina B

 “. . .  when I was on ESA, my council tax was £11 per month. It’s now £200.” Scarlett

 “I've now received a Council Tax Bill stating my CT payment to rise by £64 a month from January. I've no idea why?” Ivan

 “I used to get full council tax benefit, now I'm told I'm not eligible for any.” Jane

High Court victory
But two claimants in this position brought a claim in the High Court against Three Rivers District Council.

The claimants income didn’t change when they switched to UC, but the council treated the transitional protection element of their UC as surplus income.  This meant that the claimants went from being exempt from council tax to being liable to pay more than £1,500 per year.

The High Court ruled that this was discriminatory, because the transitional protection element was linked to their disabilities and their income had not increased as a result of migration, but their liability to pay council tax had.

The Court ordered the council to pay the claimants £5,000 in damages for discrimination, refund their council tax and pay their legal costs.  The local authority will now have disregard transitional protection payments for all of its residents.

Challenging an increase
If you have found yourself in this position, you may be able to challenge the increase in your council tax.  You will need to show that:

1  You were receiving the severe disability premium prior to migration.

2  Your council tax liability has increased significantly following migration to UC.

3  Your local authority do not expressly disregard (or provide a discretion to disregard) transitional payments.

Every council has a duty to publish its council tax reduction scheme, so you should be able to find it on their website.

In the case of Three Rivers District Council, the scheme listed the UC elements that could be disregarded, including disabled child element and carer element, but did not list the transitional protection element.

Many such schemes will not be so detailed, however.

For example, East Devon District Council’s council tax reduction scheme states:

“Those migrating to Universal Credit  (UC) may have a change in banding even though the amount of income received may not change.  This is because UC is not a passported benefit for CTR and we look at the amount and type of income you receive.”

If you live in East Devon, were receiving a severe disability premium and your council tax went up as a result of  migrating to UC, then it would be worth getting legal advice on whether this can be challenged.

Every council has its own council tax reduction scheme and the fact that your council tax went up after migrating to UC does not mean that you are certain to be able to successfully challenge the increase.  But it is definitely worth looking into.

Where to get help
The claimants in the Three Rivers case were represented by Emma Pein at Bindmans solicitors, who instructed barrister Tom Rosyston of Garden Court North Chambers.  Readers may remember Tom providing legal advice to Benefits and Work at a much discounted rate during the successful fight against the proposed PIP four-point rule.

If you think you meet the three conditions above, Emma Pein can be contacted at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. – we would suggest putting “Council Tax” plus the name of your local authority as the subject line.  Alternatively, you may have a local solicitor who deals with welfare benefits.

But be aware, to get free legal advice from a solicitor, you will need to be eligible for legal aid.  Alternatively, you may be able to get help from an advice agency or law centre, if you have one in your area.

If you are not able to get advice, you can try contacting your local authority and sending them a link to the order in the case above: 2026.02.02-R-Bleakley-v-TRDC-Final-Approved-Order.pdf along with a link to Council tax information letter 2/2026.  This letter from the Ministry of Housing tells councils, under the heading “Migration from legacy benefits to Universal Credit” to “reflect carefully on the way they treat benefit income and the potential impacts for low-income households. Billing authorities are also encouraged to explain their approach to affected taxpayers.” 

We’d be pleased to hear from anyone who attempts to challenge a rise in their council tax following migration to UC.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    The court case appears to only cover UC transitional protection. Many local authority council tax reduction schemes already disregard UC as it is a means tested benefit. The issue for most people appears to not be UC but be New Style ESA.

    The problem for most people appears to be that they went from ESA contributions based plus ESA income based both paid in total as ESA. Which many council tax reduction schemes disregarded as it included income based ESA that is means tested. To UC that many council tax reduction schemes disregard plus New Style ESA that many do not disregard. As New Style ESA is not means tested. And UC tells the council how much income is being deducted from their UC, which includes any New Style ESA.

    It is a postcode lottery as many council tax reduction schemes chose to still in effect disregard New Style ESA as they changed their rules to include disregards for people on disability benefits equal to New Style ESA. But some did not. And council tax reduction systems vary greatly and can be changed year on year.

    Council tax reduction schemes in general are a huge post code lottery. Some have maximum discounts below 100%, some have maximum discounts based on council tax for low band homes with people in higher band homes having to make up the difference, some have benefit passporting, some have income thresholds, some have savings limits, some have non dependent deductions. The rules for some of these schemes are tens to over a hundred pages long. The only people the government protected when the national council tax benefit was abolished was pensioners on pension credit. Who by law get 100% discount in all local authority council tax reduction schemes.

    And with the Labour government planning on merging local authority areas into single tier unitary authorities. An issue not being raised is what happens if the areas merged currently have different council tax reduction schemes? The aim of merging areas is to save money. So it seems unlikely that the most generous scheme would become the scheme for merged local authorities. Will this simplification of local government result in a hidden benefit cut?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    So much for the migration being seemless and easy.

    From the DWP having to amend the online UC application to include the question asking whether you are currently receiving ESA so that people migrating would not be asked for fitnotes to this.

    It's quite clear this hasn't been thought through properly and as a result sick and disabled people have had to suffer. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Jonno
      While lots of people get more money under UC than under ESA. There have been losers as well as winners. And the government must have always known it would not be seamless and easy. As not only do local authority council tax reduction schemes treat people on UC and New Style ESA differently to those on Contributions based ESA plus Income based ESA. UC housing support and Housing benefit rules are not identical. So some people not only saw their council tax reduction drop causing a big jump in their council tax bill, they also saw their rent support drop causing a big jump in their rent bill. 



  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    My council tax stayed the same £18 a month band A for a small 1 bedroom flat in northern England but I have hated every minute of being on universal credit ever since was transferred it’s coming up to a year now moved across march 2025 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 minutes ago
      @Anon I hear you, and I'm in a similar position. I seem to run out of money far quicker on UC than I ever did on ESA, and have to wait a lot longer (monthly payments rather than fortnightly) for money to be available again to pay for food and care charges, etc.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Thank you B&W for your fantastic journalism. Very much appreciated. I hope none of us here ever have to challenge such an oversight, but if we do this article will be the very best place to start 🙏 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.