- Posts: 58
8- Getting round safely
- Patel
- Topic Author
- Offline
b) Cannot safely complete a potentially hazadous task such ascrossing a road without being accompanied by another person(15 points)
My ESA may be dependant on how i approach this descriptor and would like some guidance
to ensurei my comprehension is accurate.
Briefly i suffer from a eye condition called Keraticonous which has left me with no vision in one eye
and limited vision in other eye with the aid of a specialised contact lens suitable for wear around 6 hours a day( as advised by my lens practioner).Without the lens i am effectively without no vision in the secondeye as well. For me to recognise a face it needs to be 12in in front of me. Hence for 18 hoursa day i am nerly totally visually impaired.
I not iif you wear contact lens or glasses you will be assessed as when wearing them and conditions are bright electric light or daylight.Further even with lens ov my vision suffers by as much as 75% in darkness or badly lit areas hence i dont venture out unaccompanied at such times.
To questions i will answer it varies and provide explanation.
Will i be eligible for 15 point descriptors.
I cannot use guide dogs for perfectly acceptable reasons and guide can presents difficulties because of my poor mobility.
My second query concerns exemption on exceptional circumstances. I am Hepatatis B+ve and so i cannot donate blood. Also when i am in hospital i have to be kept in a isolation room with special precautions being taken by staff attending me. T^hey need to wear hats, face masksand protective clothing to prevent them from contact with my blood. Similar arguement can be applied to workplace.
Am i exempt?
Regards
Patel
Your ability will be based on whether you can manage most of the time.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51284
You do not say what level of capability you have with your contact lens in, this is the crucial information that will determine whether you score points or not.
Extract from the WCA handbook (available in the Members Area)
People with acuity below 3/60 on the Snellen chart would be considered as severely sight impaired. People with acuity of 3/60 but less than 6/60 with significant visual field restriction may also be registered as severely sight impaired. For sight impairment there is no formal definition, however those with acuity of 3/60 to 6/60 with a full visual field may be registered as sight impaired. Those who have a gross contraction of the visual field and vision of 6/18 or even better may also be registered as sight impaired
So if your remaining sight has been tested and you have the results, you should include them with your ESA50.
With regard your second query, you can certainly use this argument, but I would not rely on it, as the law allows the Decision Maker to take account of "reasonable adjustments being made in the claimant’s workplace", when making a Decision on your claim.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Patel
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 58
my main question remains the vision is limited to 6 hours a day as that is my contact lens wearing time permitted.. Other 18 hours I am technically blind. During these hours and in darkness, badly lit areas
I am unable to carry out descriptors (a +b). therefore I am unable to carry out activity majority of time,
as and when I want and safely. Does my argument stand?
Mental Health Descriptors Awarness of hazards, coping with changes, going out have studied them very carefully. If I consider my "visual difficulties" I score very highly and meet support group criteria. Without my visual abilities consideration I score nothing. What do I do, can I use visual problems or not.
Secondly medical assessment daily living awareness of hazards mentions activities related to driving,
road safety awareness. Are these not visual related. Please help me.
Kind Regards
Patel
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51284
Patel wrote: Had a eye test today. My VA is 6/60 and there is loss in visual fields as well.VA is bad but not bad enough to qualify as registered blind however optician confirmed it is severely impaired. Any way
my main question remains the vision is limited to 6 hours a day as that is my contact lens wearing time permitted.. Other 18 hours I am technically blind. During these hours and in darkness, badly lit areas
I am unable to carry out descriptors (a +b). therefore I am unable to carry out activity majority of time,
as and when I want and safely. Does my argument stand?
Mental Health Descriptors Awarness of hazards, coping with changes, going out have studied them very carefully. If I consider my "visual difficulties" I score very highly and meet support group criteria. Without my visual abilities consideration I score nothing. What do I do, can I use visual problems or not.
Secondly medical assessment daily living awareness of hazards mentions activities related to driving,
road safety awareness. Are these not visual related. Please help me.
Kind Regards
Patel
The one thing I cannot discern from your post is how your vision is affected with your contact lenses as opposed to when you are not wearing them, and if I cannot figure it out then a DWP Decision Maker probably will not be able to either.
So, are you saying that your VA is 6/60 with the lens or without, because if it is with, then there should be no issue in regard to the majority of the time?
The problem with you relying on the Mental Health descriptors such as Going Out, is that the law, as of 28 January 2013, requires any such problems to be the result of a mental health issue, if your only reason for meeting their criteria is your eyesight then you will not score points.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Patel
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 58
no vision. A face needs to be within 12in of me to recognise it ( technically blind for all intense
and purposes) for 18 hours.
On the mental issues I suffer from clinical depression as well. However visual plays major part.
I can concentrate on depression ,moodswings, and lack of concentration. Should I mention visual
as secondary or leave it out altogether?
Another question is related to medication and its side effects ( mental). I take (30) tablets a day for various conditions heart, hypertension, immuno-suppressents, diabetes, and my pharmacist confirms I am the highest consumer. My concern is medication doesn't fall under
a) mental health disorders
b) learning difficulties
c)psycotic disorders
d) severe anxiety.
I do not have any other mental difficulty besides depression. How do I link side effect of medecines
to mental descriptors?
Regards
Patel
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jeannie
For ESA your eye sight with the contact lenses in your eye will be taken into account, you may not score any points for when you don't wear a contact lens. Your sight will be check in good lighting, not poor lighting. So, any problems you have in poor lighting may not be taken into account.
You need to think about what problems you have with mobility with the contact lens in your eye, like do you bump into people because of your field vision? Do you knock things over because of problems seeing the depth and distant of things? Do you have problems with glare? Do you see things in focus? With a contact lens in your eye can you cross a road safely? Is your eye condition degenerative? How stable is your eye condition? Are you under a Cornea Specialist at the hospital?
Mental Health Descriptors Awareness of hazards isn't for visually impaired people so you won't score any points there.
I have similar problems to you, my vision is 3/60 and I'm blind in one eye. My sight is a lot worse at night, but my night vision won't be taken into account by ATOS.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.