× Members

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG

  • Freda
  • Topic Author
10 years 1 month ago #119557 by Freda
Replied by Freda on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
Well I was unable to get any help from anywhere re my appeal to the UT so I need to get on and submit something myself. Need to get it off tomorrow as the time is almost up. Panicking to say the least. Surely someone must have some experience of Upper Tribunal appeals here? I don't know what to do. I'm at the stage where I can't think straight any more.

At the moment I'm putting together all the copies and stuff that I need to enclose. It says I need to include a copy of the letter from the FTT telling me I have been granted permission to appeal, but it does not mention specifically the Decision Notice that came along with this. I don't know whether to include it or not. Does anyone know?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
10 years 1 month ago - 10 years 1 month ago #119562 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
Hi F,

There is nothing amiss other than all post have to be read and approved by a Mod before they show up on the forum, and until a short time ago, there was only one Mod online, Gordon.

The UTT should have the decision notice, however, it will do no harm to include a copy.

You should concentrate on highlighting how and why you consider that the FTT have erred in law and could refer to the decision notice if this highlights any possible error in law.

The UTT will not be "retrying" your FTT appeal, they will simply be looking at whether the FTT have erred in law.

See : Appealing to The Upper Tier, DR UK Factsheet

The usual suspects, re – errors of law. Insufficient findings of fact, failure to explain why they have disregarded any evidence favourable to the appellant, failure to explain why they’ve relied on any material evidence against the appellant, particularly where that evidence was put at issue by the appellant, complete mishandling of relevant evidence or applying the law incorrectly, etc.

Or, maybe the FTT have failed to take account of precedent case law with a look alike case to your own.

The UTT should make allowances for you not having representation.

bro58
Last edit: 10 years 1 month ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Freda
  • Topic Author
10 years 2 weeks ago - 10 years 2 weeks ago #120628 by Freda
Replied by Freda on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
The Upper Tribunal has written asking for my consent to make a decision without giving reasons under rule 40(3)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008. Apparently this will expedite disposal of the appeal. Any ideas about whether this is a good idea, or not?
Last edit: 10 years 2 weeks ago by Gordon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 2 weeks ago #120636 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
Freda

I've looked up the legislation and it offers no real insight in to what they are suggesting and whether it is to your advantage or not, a speedy result may be to your advantage but I am not sure what you are giving up by going this route.

Decisions

40. (1) The Upper Tribunal may give a decision orally at a hearing.

(2) Subject to rule 14(2) (withholding harmful information), the Upper Tribunal must provide to each party as soon as reasonably practicable after making a decision which finally disposes of all issues in the proceedings (except a decision under Part 7)—

(a) a decision notice stating the Tribunal’s decision; and

(b) notification of any rights of review or appeal against the decision and the time and manner in which such rights of review or appeal may be exercised.

(3) The Upper Tribunal must provide written reasons for its decision with a decision notice provided under paragraph (2)(a) unless—

(a) the decision was made with the consent of the parties; or

(b) the parties have consented to the Upper Tribunal not giving written reasons.

(4) The Tribunal may provide written reasons for any decision to which paragraph (2) does not apply.


I've highlighted the relevant section.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Freda
  • Topic Author
9 years 7 months ago - 9 years 7 months ago #125360 by Freda
Replied by Freda on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
Hi folks I have been having a nightmare of a time recently but the good news is my appeal has at last been allowed and I have been put in support group. My ESA was stopped many months ago because they said I had not attended a WRAG interview without giving them a reason but I had actually written to them saying I could not come and why. I still am not receiving anything even though appeal was granted several weeks ago. All I got from them was about a fiver which they say is arrears up to the time they stopped my payments. How long should I have to wait to get my payments restarted? Also, surely they need to pay me all that I should have got if they hadn't wrongly sanctioned me?
Last edit: 9 years 7 months ago by Gordon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #125361 by slugsta
Replied by slugsta on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
It's very good to hear that your appeal was allowed, thanks for letting us know :) I believe it is not unusual for it to take around 8 weeks for payment to be made.

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Freda

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: bro58GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris