Hi,
My MR has been sent off, without any new evidence (after 6 years in the support group with no change in my conditions I was, I believe, wrongly moved into the wrag), but, as explained in the MR guide, if the decision goes against me the decision maker will call me to confirm/discuss anything unclear.
Assuming this happens, should I make specific reference to the support group descriptors I believe apply to me, ie, "13 (a) clearly applies to me, and this is why..."?
Similarly, should I explain in some detail why I think Regulation 35 (2) (b) applies to me?
Or should I avoid these legal terms altogether?
Thanks for any help
