Labour’s cruel “severe conditions criteria” (SCC) plan is not designed to protect seriously ill claimants as the government claims, it is intended to save money at their expense.  Because tens of thousands of claimants too ill to ever work again will be forced to live for years on half the additional payment that current claimants receive.

The SCC are part of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill and are intended to be a concession to Labour MPs concerned about the effect of the cuts on disabled claimants.

From April 2026, new claimants who meet the SCC will not have to face future reassessments for health element of universal credit, though they will still be reassessed for personal independence payment (PIP).

At the same time, Labour is almost halving the limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) element payable to new claimants, but claimants with LCWRA who also meet the SCC will get the full amount.

The SCC qualifying conditions

The current qualifying conditions for LCWRA require one of a number of descriptors to apply to the claimant “for the majority of the time”.  For example: 

  • Cannot pick up and move a 0.5 litre carton full of liquid.
  • Cannot press a button(such as a telephone keypad) with either hand or; cannot turn the pages of a book with either hand.
  • Cannot cope with any change, due to cognitive impairment or mental disorder, to the extent that day-to-day life cannot be managed.

The severe conditions criteria require claimants to meet the same criteria “constantly”.

Constantly is defined in the Bill as “at all times” or “on all occasions on which the claimant undertakes or attempts to undertake the activity”.

However, many degenerative conditions such as Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis and muscular dystrophy follow a slow path of decreasing ability, with periods of remission.  So, most days you may be unable to turn the pages of a book, but you may have occasional good days when you can do so.

Or your manual dexterity may be better first thing in the morning but get rapidly worse as fatigue sets in.

At the moment, a claimant in these circumstances would get the full LCWRA amount, which from April 2026 will be £423.27 a month, because they meet the descriptor for the majority of the time.

However from April 2026, new LCWRA claimants in the same position will only get around half this amount, £217.26, because they do not meet the descriptor constantly.

But the same claimant will never improve, their condition will only get worse.  So, if they are already unable to work because of a degenerative disease, they will never be able to work again in the future. 

Under Labour’s new rules, however, they will have to exist on half the LCWRA element, possibly for years after there is no chance of their ever being able to work again, until they can show that they are constantly unable to carry out an activity, rather than just for the majority of the time.

So, far from guaranteeing  that people who will never work again are supported, the SCC guarantees that they will live  on a severely reduced income for years, until their degenerative disease enters its most debilitating stage.

For some conditions, including some severe mental illnesses, there may never be a time when the claimant is certain not to have periods of remission, so they may never get the full LCWRA award.

Substantial risk

The SCC do not apply to “non-functional descriptors”. 

Most importantly, if a claimant has been found to have LCWRA because “there would be a substantial risk to the mental or physical health of any person if you were found not to have limited capability for work-related activity” then they cannot be considered to meet the SCC.  

In 2022 14.6% of new awards for LCWRA were on the basis of substantial risk. 

The substantial risk could be because, for example you have a heart or lung condition and the exertion involved attending work, or appointments at the Jobcentre, might lead to a serious deterioration in your health.  Or you might have severe seizures without warning and travelling to work or being in a workplace would put you at substantial risk.

Or the substantial risk could be due to severe mental illness which means that the anxiety caused by travelling to or attending work would be likely to lead you to harm yourself.

Whatever, the cause, if your have LCWRA because of the substantial risk rules, you cannot be considered for the SCC.

How long will protection last?

The SCC are claimed to protect claimants from ever being assessed again. But, as noted above, people who meet the SCC can still be reassessed for PIP.

From 2028, Labour are planning to abolish the work capability assessment (WCA) and make receipt of PIP daily living the gateway for the UC health element.  But they have repeatedly failed to explain what will happen to someone who meets the SCC if they lose their PIP daily living award on review.

Will they still be able to claim UC health even though they no longer meet the basic qualifying conditions?  If not, then the SCC guarantee may only last a few years, rather than a lifetime as Labour claims.

As of May 2024, just 32.1% of claimants who received the UC LCWRA element also had a PIP daily living award which included a score of at least 4 points for one activity

Peace of mind

In unveiling the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, Liz Kendall claimed that it “represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.  This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot. . .”

In reality, the Bill simply seeks every opportunity to take more money from disabled claimants, whilst telling them it really is in their own best interests.

[Edit: information on substantial risk added]

Latest news on PIP/UC changes

What’s changing, when

What you can do

New PIP test

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    Sky news report. 

    I Like the line "Moderate MPs" 


    https://news.sky.com/story/labour-mps-table-reasoned-amendment-in-attempt-to-halt-welfare-bill-13387674
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    This Kendall woman is going to say anything just to get the backing of the rest of the mps just to soften them up to pass this bill . She knows 9 out of 10 people will not keep there pip . She needs to live in the real world. Leave the disabled and most vulnerable people alone . Let’s hope ms Kendall you don’t ever get a medical condition and can’t work and need the benefit system to support you . 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    This is tasty!! Labour rebels have tabled an amendment to delay or stop the bill and the Guardian reports they hope for up to 100 signatures

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/23/labour-mps-launch-major-rebellion-to-stop-benefits-cuts-bill
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @SLB The Tories and Reform will probably support the Bill though. 
      They will only vote against to embarrass the Govt. 

      These signatories represent 1/6 of the House of Commons. 

      I am hopeful obviously. But they don’t have the numbers yet for certainty. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @SLB
      "We are so close!"

      I agree it's not looking great for the government. First a whip resigns, then this from the chair of the Treasury select committee, a senior Labour MP chairing one of the most important select committees. This will give encouragement to other MPs thinking of voting against and it's certainly much harder for the whips to credibly issue threats to backbenchers when those backbenchers know they have senior MPs on their side.

      That said, while this is encouraging, we have to keep up the pressure on Labour MPs. We would not have got this far without that pressure and we cannot afford to let up until these cuts are dead and buried.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Gingin This could be it, surely? The choices are as follows:  

      If the amendment doesn't get chosen, then the people who signed it will probably vote against the bill, thus making it fail.  

      If the amendment does get chosen but doesn't pass, those who signed it will still probably vote against the actual bill, thus making it fail.  

      If the amendment does get chosen and passes, it effectively derails the bill anyway.

      And I think they would vote against the bill as signing the amendment means they are finally going public as their names will be known.  That would gain them encouragement to vote against.  We are so close!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    Can I ask a question as I am very confused. 
    I have been on Contributions based new style ESA since 2021. Assuming I still remain LCWRA and the New Employment insurance comes 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Helen Galloway The proposal is to get rid of your support component. They plan for it to last only for 6/12 months. 

      Obviously I may be completely wrong, but that was my take. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    The government doing disability welfare reform split across multiple bills is just a recipe for constant uncertainty and the sense of impending doom. We are going to have this Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill dealing with the parts of the Pathways to Work Green Paper the government is not consulting on, then latter this year another disability welfare bill dealing with parts of the Pathways to Work Green Paper the government is consulting on, then next year or latter another disability welfare bill dealing with the policies announced in the Pathways to Work Green Paper as going to be part of future consultations not the current consultation.

    And going by the Pathways to Work Green Paper it does not look like there will be much left of the disability welfare system. We get an ever smaller life boat that is increasing unseaworthy for those still in it, while ever more people are not in the lifeboat and are drowning in the sea. And we all keep getting told this is fair and for our own good and the good of the nation. And the increase in poverty and deaths we see is not happening.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @john The future does not look great. 
      I foresee a spike in people accessing MH services.. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @john
      "The government doing disability welfare reform split across multiple bills is just a recipe for constant uncertainty and the sense of impending doom"

      I think the reason for this is that they literally haven't the faintest idea what they're doing. They've grabbed at something they thought might save a few quid (spoiler: it won't) in order for Reeves to meet her absurd "fiscal rules" without bothering to check if any of this is remotely feasible (spoiler: it's not), let alone bothering to determine the impact on the very large number of people affected. 

      The proposals are riddled with absurdities and contradictions which become evident as soon as they're subjected to any scrutiny. They therefore cannot produce any answers that engage with the details of what they're proposing, so instead we get a mixture of meaningless soundbites, gaslighting and outright lies.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @D.Head Her charm skills must be lacking.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    Over 70 Labour MPs have announced this evening they will vote against the cults 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @MrFibro Labour MPs who abstain will be destroying their credibility but if it achieves the same result, I’ll happily take it 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Cathedral city Do you have a link for that figure? If it's true it means the government is likely to lose, because there will inevitably be other Labour MPs who will also vote against but haven't said so yet.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @Cathedral city You mean they will abstain. Which in my view is cowardice.  It's either a YAY or a NAY.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    Robert Peston X page recently.

    Important story by @romillyweeks . This widely backed reasoned amendment that she says will be tabled tonight has the potential to kill the government’s reforms to PIP snd the disability elements of Universal Credit. This would be a huge humiliation for Keir Starmer and Liz Kendall.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    Kendall going to have a rough time with MPs according too itv.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    Thank you for putting this together, this is horrendous, Kendall and the rest of the Labour MPs supporting this are just flat out lying, repeatedly, and it's going to cause immeasurable harm to millions of us.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    Help putting together an email to MPs if you need it (probably been posted before but won’t hurt to post again

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @D Done and thank you.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @D Thanks for posting 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    Watching Work and Pensions Questions  from the Commons just now and Labour's front  bench team continue  to peddle lies and half truths as if  they are facts. The sophistry, evasion and hypocrisy are off the scale. They are like members of a cult who are blinded to reality. It's very depressing viewing..
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @ Mark S. It's a 2 tier benefits system.  In actual fact, its a 2 tier Britain period.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @ Mark S. Mafiosi thick as thieves 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @ Mark S. If I was a MP I would have asked.
      Despite 50% of those in receipt of PIP daily living not scoring 4 points on a single descriptor. The government tells us that only 10% of those on PIP daily living will lose their PIP daily living. As somehow the other 40% will now score 4 points on at least one descriptor despite the descriptors and points in the assessment system not changing. The vast majority of that 40% are now on standard rate PIP. How many are expected to move to enhanced rate PIP as a result of somehow now scoring 4 points on at least one single descriptor. As enhanced rate PIP is about 50% more money than standard rate PIP how much will this cost. And how does this increase in cost make government spending on PIP more financially sustainable.

      10% lose PIP saving 10%
      up to 40% have their PIP entitlement increase by 50% so a 20% increase in spending
      net saving -10% 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @ Mark S. I keep writing complaints to the Labour Party. They probably don’t care but it makes me feel better! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    Kendall to face PLP to talk to labour rebels tonight ?si=-ByupX6b87CSI4q3
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @rtbcpart2 I could not repeat it on here. 😆
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @The Dogmother @The Dogmother Nope, too many gooduns - you'll have to tell us 😛
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Anniesmum Love it.. i won't repeat my favourite line. 🤪 i'm sure you can guess.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    It seems odd that, now the bill is published, there's far less stories in the press about it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Slb Iran v Israel/USA is the reason.  If all out war does occur in the next few months in the Middle East we're all screwed - I can remember the effects of the Yon Kippur war of October 1973 and the quadrupling of the price of oil.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    Starmer, Kendal, Reeves, Timms, Jones, Western etc and all of the other rotten Labour government, cabinet ministers and all of the Secretary of States. They seem to believe, that their inhumane reforms on welfare. Will all of sudden once all of the ill and disabled are able to start to go into full time employment. That all of sudden all of their elements related to being ill and or disabled will all just magically miraculously disappear!    
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @Mouseclickkeyboardtap into non existent jobs with no affirmative action to compel employers to create and provide those jobs!

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.