The influential, Labour dominated Commons Work and Pensions committee (WPC) has written to the government calling for it to delay any changes to personal independence payment (PIP) eligibility and universal credit (UC) rates.

The WPC began an inquiry into the Pathways to Work Green Paper on 3 April, but has issued interim findings and recommendations because a Commons vote on some of the provisions is expected soon.

The WPC warns the government in its letter that the proposed changes “might not incentivise work, as the Government hopes, but rather push people deeper into poverty, worsen health, especially in more deprived areas, and move people further from the labour market, as evidence suggests has happened in the past with similar reforms.” 

In its letter, the committee asks the government to: “delay any changes to PIP eligibility or UC rates, extend and expand the current consultation, and work to co-produce measures with disabled people and their organisations, reflecting the Government’s commitment on ‘nothing about me, without me’.

The letter goes on to recommend that the government:  “take a ‘precautionary principle’ approach and immediately undertake an independent, comprehensive analysis of the impact of the proposed cuts in UC health support on employment, poverty and health outcomes.”

Finally, the committee urges the government to:  “delay its plans to amend the eligibility criteria for the daily living component of PIP and engage disabled people and their organisations in order to coproduce proposals for a new PIP, as part of the PIP review. Most importantly, we need to guarantee that those who need PIP will not lose out. At that point, it should publish and properly consult on its proposals more widely.”

Liz Kendall has until Monday 2 June to respond to the letter.

Chair of the committee, Debbie Abrahams, told ITV news that there was expert evidence that cutting benefits could increase the risk of suicides. 

The WPC is made up of 11 MPs:  7 Labour, 2 Conservative, 2 LibDem.

Moreover, as the Canary pointed out, four of the Labour MPs are members of the “Get Britain Working” group which actively supports benefit cuts.

In theory, this is a committee whose loyalty the government should be able to count on.

So, for it to express such strong concerns about the Green Paper will be a real blow for Labour, which is struggling to find anyone who is in favour of its proposals.

You can download a copy of the letter, along with oral evidence transcripts and copies of written evidence here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I have to say pip is not easy to get it took nearly five for six years for it to get sorted and three or four tribunals who ever said it was easy
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    "Liz Kendall has until Monday 2 June to respond to the letter"....

    It is now Monday 9 June but I cannot find any details of her response. 
    Does anyone know, please?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Gov keeps saying those that need PIP will continue to get it and they will protect those with non recoverable illness and disability. How do they propose to do this when points are already manipulated in order to stop claiments getting PIP and or they're manipulated. In order to keep claiments on the lower level of payment. It's not true that these people will be protected. Plus how on earth is someone in their very late 50s or early 60s, with chronic illness or disability going to get a job, no one - simply no-one will employ these people with their countless hospital and gp appointments etc to attend.  Is government living on another planet or do they simply not care! We need proof that claiments who have chronic illness or disability will NOT lose their PIP and will NOT not be reassessed. Once again those in their late fifties and early sixties with evidence of chronic illness should not be reassessed and should be allowed to keep their pip, with no more reassessments end of-  chronic is permanent
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    First pensioners, now disabled . . . WHY?! there's plenty of wasted government money and plenty of opportunities to raise funds. Could Starmer please justify 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    Does anyone know the actual date of the all important vote in Parliament?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Good teamwork everyone. This is only happening because of our relentless collective pressure.

    We must all continue the pressure and double down on it. If something is working - double down on it to ensure it succeeds.

    Full steam ahead
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    SLB - one the committee has just shown his true colours!

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Yorkie Bard Pinto-Duschinsky is one of the worst of the worst. He is everything that is wrong with what Labour now is.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Yorkie Bard Maybe this should be sent to the committee, pointing out that he is trying to undermine them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Yorkie Bard I can't see how Pinto-Duschinsky can have done himself anything but harm admitting that standpoint. Noone is fooled by the shave it to save it rhetoric and frankly Kendall's "not for the sake of it but to save it" isn't even as good as my version 😂
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Letter received from Ed Davey today:

    “Just a note to say thank you for letting me share your story and concerns on PMQs today. 

    Reading your submission to the APPG and speaking to you on the phone helped me understand your understandable worries about the impact of the PIP changes on family carers like yourself.

    I know also how difficult it can be to talk publicly about your situation - but it’s so important that voices like yours are heard. So thank you again.

    I’m determined to battle these changes hard! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Gingin Very, vey well done Gingin - you are the tonic we all need!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    I confess that I shed a tear or two last night when this letter to Liz Kendall was published.  It's good to know in absolute concrete terms that a cross-party group of politicians is on our side.  I feel as if we are winning the war - slowly, but surely.  I have posted the conclusion of the letter on X, and encouraging everyone to repost it so that the government can't somehow try to cover this up or hide it.  I admit I am rather gobsmacked that this letter isn't making the news today.

    I feel that if we could have everything delayed (as the committee requests) by even as little as six months, we might escape the worst of the cuts.  I say that because that would mean bringing in the new rules in, say, late spring or early summer 2027.  Bearing in mind that it would presumably only apply to reassessments and new claims started after that day - and that the assessments are taking 8-12 months - that would mean that people would start to get results using the new rules in the spring of 2028.  That's just twelve months before the next election.  

    Would Labour really want its voters starting to feel the effects of the new eligibility rules in the year leading up to the election?  I don't think so.  It would be suicidal for the Labour party at that point.   There may be tweaks to the system here and there - and, yes, some of us will lose out - but I don't think they'll make it so people are losing eight to ten thousand pounds a year - or more.  I have no idea what would happen after the next election - or who is likely to win it - but I think it would be unhealthy to worry about that at this stage.

    I also wonder if a U-turn and/or delays would result in the sacking of Liz Kendall.  These are, after all, her ideas, and they are inadequately researched, inadequately presented, and come with an inadequate attempt at rigging their own consultation.  Debbie Abrahams to take her place, I wonder?  She has been on the Work and Pensions committe for 9 years of her time as an MP.  She should be a shoe-in, and could certainly help to mend relations between claimants and the government.  That said, she did vote for the changes to winter fuel allowance.  

    Overall, though, rightly or wrongly, I'm feeling both more emotional and optimistic today.   But I also now realise that I can't keep a fight up on this level for another eighteen months.  Yes, it has certainly kept me occupied, but I think it would send me over the edge mentally if this goes on beyond the summer.  If there's a U-turn, we might have to wait until July to hear it - announce it close to the recess and then run away to constituencies for the summer so we forget about it all. 


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @SLB We are only winning ground because of your huge efforts, SLB. Thank you from millions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Gingin Congratulations Ginny, brilliant news and very well deserved!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Gingin Well done ! You deserve it. Enjoy your new role. 

      Thank you for the support you have e given us all. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Gingin Many congratulations Gingin. And thank you for all you are doing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Gingin That's great news!  Congratulations!!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    Speaking of "all of us campaigning together" @CaroA, I was wondering in my post under the "Are Tories set to vote against Green Paper cuts?" article whether we should up the anti by inviting (pushing?) even the sympathetic and rebel Labour mps to pressure their unsympathetic colleagues into supporting us and voting against the green paper. With enough momentum things could turn from Labour mps being afraid to defy the whip to their being afraid of voting on the losing side - if the vote goes against the cuts.

    It's one thing to hope for a Tory vote against the government, but what we need is to flip that inflated parliamentary majority Starmer has taken for granted, and rub his nose in it.

    We are making headway. Hang on in there, @CaroA!



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @sara Thank you Sara much appreciated.  I tried to post this but pressed the wrong button somewhere so hope I am not double posting but hopefully we are moving things in the right direction! 😊
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Gingin Thank you so much and congratulations on all you are achieving for us - and well done with your new job!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @CaroA Great job @Caro A, no stopping you! Love how you've applied the pressure on your mp to 'encourage' others already 😉
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @sara Yes! Loving that picture you painted there Sara
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @CaroA Brilliant, CaroA
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    Here's the latest from Mrs 4%. I am tempted to channel my inner John McEnroe and shout "you cannot be serious" but apparently she is. According to her, benefit cuts are key to fighting Reform UK.

    Lost for words.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Jonno
      "According to her, benefit cuts are key to fighting Reform UK."

      ......and yet the evidence shows that they are losing far more votes to the Lib Dems and Greens  (who both oppose the cuts) than they are to Reform. The last poll I saw on this said that 11% of 2024 Labour voters were open to voting Reform, but 41% were open to voting Lib Dem and 29% for the Greens. So what do Kendall and co do? Er....ignore the 70% they're losing to the Lib Dems and Greens and chase the 11% who might vote Reform. Who will never vote for them anyway, no matter how far to the right they go. That's the thing with the Labour right: they're not only callous, they're also politically incompetent. And these are the self-styled "adults in the room". Oh dear....


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @rtbcpart2 Ha! Brilliant move DPCG!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Jonno
      Never mind her @Jonno, just enjoy this - I can't hear it too often, it's brought on a chuckle since the first time it was pointed out:

      "The Disability Poverty Campaign Group has circulated analysis among Labour MPs that showed that for more than 200 of them, their majorities are smaller than the number of PIP claimants in their constituency"".

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Jonno She hasn't an ounce of shame, which is what makes her so dangerous. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    Thanks to benefits and work for publishing this good news, there is so much doom and gloom around at the moment. It's promising that the WPC are supposedly loyal to the labour party yet even they can see how harmful and harsh these proposals are, not to mention the effect they are already having on disabled people and their families. But of course, Starmer, Reeves, Kendall and Timms will take no notice, they simply won't listen as they haven't been doing all along. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    Probably a question for the people at B&W: does the govt have to act on these recommendations? Or is it protocol to do so?  Or is it known for governments to just plough on anyway? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 days ago
      @Sam Thanks
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 days ago
      @Slb I believe they have to respond but commitees hold no authority over the government. It is seen as more of an advisory thing  but a highly influencial one
      So no they can't force the government to do anything but explain itself but it will certainly influence a good few MPs votes
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    long letter sent to MP by email. I'll update you all on his response. I have also contacted the RNIB campaigns department to see what they are doing as well (not a lot it seems, which I fear is common throughout the 'charitable' sector)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    oh dear seems like the ides of march no one wants to lose their comfy seats and pay 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    I hope B & W don't mind me sending this over to my MP, with my own individual thoughts, certainly around employment. Most employers do not have a clue how to interact with disabled colleagues, and frankly find us too much of a hassle, not least many of us are probably better educated than them, and certainly more assertive, which they consider to be aggression.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    Thank you Benefits and Work, and thank you James for your comment — and yes, no doubt they’ll respond with the same garbage rhetoric we’ve heard again and again.

    But where is the accountability for the suffering already caused — not just by those who were in power, but by those who are still choosing to carry these viscious disabling policies forward?

    How many more sleepless nights, hospital visits, mental health emergencies, and relapses in chronic illness are needed before someone takes responsibility?

    How many carers, families, and friends have had to bear the emotional toll, watching the people they love deteriorate under this  stress and fear?

    Given up hope of accountability from the DWP long ago — and now we’re left asking: does it even exist in government - it looks like Deborah Abraham's and her committee seem to be trying to lead the way to a kinder politics of the future. Will they be heard?

    God knows — I really hope something better comes from all of this: from the petitions, the letters, the raw courage of all of us campaigning together. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Frances Thank you Frances definitely good to get encouragement so often it can feel just too much!  Yes he is one of my favorite poets and a great choice of poem!  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @Frances Yes Frances! Vulnerable? They’d better think again- we’re nothing if not determined. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 days ago
      @CaroA @CaroA, I posted hours ago but it didn't come up. What I was saying was, whilst your concerns, so sensitively expressed, are totally understandable, and dreadful suffering has already come about as a result of this government's irresponsible tinkering, you should hold on to your last sentence.

      Something better has come about - we have raised the profile of the issues and brought it to the attention of the media and those in power who are willing to help us, and we've proved we can stick up for ourselves, be a force together, kick up a storm and, as I said, not go gentle.

      I posted a link to the Dylan Thomas poem I was referencing, because I thought you might appreciate it, if you hadn't seen it before.

      https://www.google.co.uk/url?q=https://poets.org/poem/do-not-go-gentle-good-night&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjl9OSZ1beNAxXCZ0EAHcwCAiwQFnoECAYQAg&usg=AOvVaw0zLt7JtkzN6wFE541-YHrK
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 days ago
      @CaroA So agree. The levels of public hostility have been ratcheted up by the government in an attempt to sway public opinion against us.  I doubt that will change back any time soon.  We all have to live with that and cope with its daily effects. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
    We're winning. Slowly but surely, we're winning. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.