The Labour government has got its severely weakened welfare bill through its third reading without further defeats, after the major concessions made before and during the second reading. 

The bill passed its third reading by 336 votes to 242.

47 Labour MPs voted against the bill at third reading, 333 Labour MPs voted in favour, along with 3 independents. 

This compares with the second reading, where 49 Labour MPs voted against. 

Readers will be well aware of the dramatic scenes during the second reading of what was then the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment bill, when Labour was forced to abandon the PIP 4-point rule entirely in order to avoid defeat.

There were no such scenes on this occasion.  The chamber was largely empty as the amendments were debated, only filling up for the votes. All the government amendments to the bill, including the promise to remove clause 5, the 4-point rule clause, were agreed.

Every non-government amendment failed, except for one relating to co-production of the Timms review, which was withdrawn after concessions from the government – see Timms review below.

Bill title

The short title of the bill has been changed from the “Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill” to the “Universal Credit Bill”, reflecting the fact that the bill no longer has anything to do with PIP.

PIP

Personal independence payment (PIP) is no longer affected by the bill in any way, either for existing claimants or new claimants.  The 4-point rule has been entirely abandoned.

There will be no changes to PIP until after the Timms review has been completed, currently expected to be in Autumn 2026.

Universal Credit

New universal credit (UC) health element claimants from April 2026 will have their UC health element almost halved and frozen.

Existing UC LCWRA claimants will not be affected by the cut or the freeze. New claimants who meet the severe conditions criteria or who are terminally ill will also be protected from the cut and the freeze.

The standard rate of UC will rise by 4.5% above inflation by 2029/30.

Severe conditions criteria

There have been no changes to the extremely hard to meet severe conditions criteria as set out in the bill.  These will come into force for new claims in April 2026 and will decide whether claimants receive the higher rate of the UC health element and whether they are subject to reassessment..

Timms did seek to reassure MPs claiming: 

"The severe conditions criteria in the bill exactly reflects how the functional tests are applied at present.  That is in guidance. It’s being moved in this bill into legislation.  It does take account of Parkinson’s.  It does take account of MS.  Because people need to meet the descriptors reliably, safely, repeatedly and in a reasonable time frame.  And so I can give a very firm assurance to those who are concerned about how the severe conditions criteria will work for those on fluctuating conditions.

"The word constantly here refers, as I said in my intervention earlier, to the functional criteria needing to apply at all times, not to somebody’s symptoms."

We consider this reassurance to be disingenuous.  We’ll be writing more about this in the near future.

Timms review

The Timms review is not part of the bill.  However, Labour MP Dr Marie Tidball sought to insert a new clause into the bill relating to co-production of the review.  Dr Tidball did not put forward the clause for a vote after receiving reassurances from Timms at the end of the debate. 

Timms called the new clause a “helpful checklist”  and said that the government would "closely consult with and actively involve persons with disabilities in carrying out the review."

He also said "I accept the proposal in section 4 of her new clause for a group to co-produce the review. Not so much to provide independent oversight as to lead and deliver it . . . I agree with her that the majority of group member need to be disabled people or representatives of disabled people's organisations and that they need to be provided with adequate support, including towards their cost of travel and taking part. . .  The outcome of the review will be central to the legislation that follows"

The Timms review is still expected to report in Autumn 2026.

Everything else

The bill only covers those three issues.  Every other proposal, such as the abolition of the WCA, the proposal to amalgamate contributory ESA and JSA into a single time limited contributory benefit  and not paying 18-21 year old PIP recipients the health element of UC is not affected by last night’s vote.  They will all require separate legislation of their own.

What happens next

At the time of writing we do not know if the bill has been certified as a money bill.  If it has not, then it will go to the Lords who can put forward amendments in the normal way.

If it is a money bill, it will still go to the House of Lords, but this is a formality.  In theory, the Lords can suggest amendments but, because it is a money bill, the government are free to simply ignore them.  After one month the bill as currently written will become law.

The changes in the bill, however, will not come into force until April 2026.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    So when will they actually start going through the wca for people who are on lcwra and been on it a while? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Has anyone any idea what the Timms review will look like for pip 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    Whta what about a carer who has health issues? If i claim lcwra now i will lose my carers element and maybe transitional payment.Any thoughts anyone please 🤔
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    I get the feeling the people will suddenly get a review of there UC after the new changes come in and oh look they failed, mandatory reconsideration failed, appeal failed, will have to make a new claim at the reduced rates, always the same with the political class straight for the dwp piggybank
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    This article by Vox Political states that the Government has no legal obligation to follow the Timms's review findings - or even debate them, let alone have a vote.  Perhaps the Benefits and work website could confirm whether this is correct: https://voxpoliticalonline.com/2025/07/10/disabled-people-betrayed-as-mps-hand-government-blank-cheque-for-welfare-cuts/?fbclid=IwY2xjawLc1dVleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETBhTE52anA2ZUttdXY4TWhEAR5tz-6rteKXrTr9MJHJjqvUjzpRlvZlYxlHXZfFhUKhJu9nVYWjwDnSHvDVhQ_aem_HQH7etnETjmBx-RoJbwuRw
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    SO  it seems if we / you claim £400  UC/// £423 mouth   LCWRA now b4 april 2026 .  NO  change  staysame .   Both GOING up each year by 4.5 %  to  2029/ 2030 ???. HOWEVER  New CLAIMS lcwra   from april 2026  be   REDUCED  50 %///1/2  to   £212 mouth  be frozen to 2030 .  However just like exciting  claims basic rate  £400 UC  go up 4.5 %  each year  not  NEW  claims £212  mouth lcwra ???.  SURELY  this IS  2 tier system  SCARY  for younger  under age 60 + today 2025 .  ANY  age 62- 65 now  has disabiltys claims LCWRA  NOW , Retires next  5 yrs 2030/ 2031  SCRAPE  th0rugth   YOUNGER ONES FUTURE FOLK DISABILITYS    you do fear for . IS  this start off SOCHIAL  system disabilty safty net (DISMANTLE) ?????? .  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @adrian For all claimants UC standard allowance increases by more than inflation.

      For existing claimants UC health is uprated such that UC standard allowance+ UC health element combined increase by inflation. So UC health is increased less than inflation.

      For new claimants UC health element is cut to £217.26 and frozen.

      Using the government/OBR forecast inflation figures this results in

      Single age 25+

      UC standard allowance 2025/26 £400.14 2026/27 £424.49 2027/28 £435.51 2028/29 £448.10 2029/30 £460.57

      UC LCWRA health element existing claim 2025/26 £400.14 2026/27 £429.39 2027/28 £433.74 2028/29 £438.53 2029/30 £443.79

      UC LCWRA health element new claim 2026/27 £217.26 2027/28 £217.26 2028/29 £217.26 2029/30 £217.26

      In 2029/30
       
      Existing claimant standard allowance £460.57 + LCWRA health element £443.79 = £904.36 (no better and no worse off than they would have been as has increased by inflation)

      New claimant standard allowance £460.57 + LCWRA health element £217.26 = £677.83 (£226.53 a month worse off than they would have been)

      Able unemployed £460.57 (£21.09 a month better off than they would have been as have had higher than inflation increases)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    Thank you B&W for keeping us up to date, I don’t think without you I would really understand everything that’s going on as been quite confusing for me, reading bits here there on other site's. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    So is this good news for people currently getting UC with the health element and pip?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Cuckoo21 Seems so if we claim lcwra now 2025 ,  AGE  62- 65 . Retire next 5 yrs . SEEMS  scraped in . BUT  you have to fill sorry  scared younger under age   60s with disabilitys of today.  NEW RULES  cuts ££ benefits . 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    When are the pip amendments likely to commence after Timms Review 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    When are the pip amendments likely to come into play after the Timms review.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I am confused I thought they were able to abolish the WCA without a vote the way it had been worded? There is so much uncertainty about many aspects I hope significant risk is still supported as a route to the Health Element as I believe the Tories tried to abolish that and it was taken to judicial review 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @janerg63 PLAN  Lcwra/  WCA  stay to 2028. THEN  2028  exciting claims lcwra  merge with be called  HEALTH ELETNMENT UC .  WE  get lcwra rate . NEW , new claims from 2028  NO  no wca  but claimntments  have pass  DAILY LIVING  eletnment  PIP  to claim get  HEALTH ELETNMENT   UC .  NO, END WCA  SPRING 2028   2.5 YRS  IF PASSED  . 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    If someone already gets lwcra what is going to happen will they lose it thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Wayne NO   no  claim lcwra now 2025 ????  no change  £400 mouth uc  £423 mouth lcwra .   go up each year 4.5 % to 2030 . NEW CLAIMS NEW  rules from april 2026 new claims lcwra £212 mouth uc£400 mouth . There lcwra be Frozen £212 mouth to 2030 . uc £400 go up 4.5% till 2030 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Wayne I hope not coz that in me.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Anybody else feel that not only have the government won, but also the media.
    The journalists could have done so much more to help us, by printing the truth about the goverments plans for the disabled. But instead (the majority) chose to do everything they could to paint us as scroungers, liars and fraudsters, not forgetting (according to them) that we are the reason for the abysmal state of our countries financial situation. (Of course, nothing to do with Reeves)
    Yet today, nothing/very little, reported in the news about the result of the vote yesterday and the devastating impact it will have, particularly for future claimants.
    Already we are classed as old news and not worthy of a mention. Something to be forgotten about.
    Those journalists that attacked us, should be ashamed of themselves.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @maggie I feel exactly the same as you do, we have lost, the power's that be hate us, the media hate us and the really sad part the vast majority of the general public hate us too, just for being in a disabled or mentally ill minority. We are the only minority that can have hate speech and lies spouted about us by everyone and nothing is done about it. We are viewed as the lowest of the low in society, this speaks volumes about the current society we live in in this county. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I'm still confused about Esa CB and the amalgamation Iv been on this for years and am 63 yrs old now I don't get severe D premium or any top up of IR I just get flat rate how will this be handled?... confused 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @rainy If you are referring to what happens when the Work Capability Assessment is abolished in 2028 and PIP daily living is used to determine eligibility. Then it looks likely that when you come up for your next Work Capability reassessment from April 2028 you will instead have to do a PIP assessment under the new Timms review PIP assessment system. Unless you are already on PIP in which case your would be reassessed when you come up for your next PIP reassessment.

      That is if the government sticks to its current plan and timetable. And can get it through parliament.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @rainy They currently plan is those just on Contributions based ESA continue to get it at least as long as the benefit continues to exist.

      They plan to abolish contributions based ESA/New Style ESA in 2028 and replace it with a new time limited 6 or 12 months contributions based unemployment benefit paid at the same rate. It is unknown if existing claimants will be affected or if they will get to keep ESA as a legacy benefit. Worse case scenario the new Unemployment benefit opens for claims in April 2028 and ESA is closed to new claims in April 2028 and existing ESA claims then end after the new 6 or 12 months time limit so October 2028 or April 2029, or in the unlikely event the government can be bothered to go through the rigmarole they get migrated from ESA to the new Unemployment benefit and then after 6 or 12 months on the new Unemployment benefit lose it due to the time limit. I expect anyone getting near the time limit would get a letter telling them their benefit is going to end and inviting them to claim UC if eligible.

      In 2029 you will presumably be state pension age and currently ESA claims are ended at state pension age anyway unless a joint claim where the other member of the couple is below state pension age. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @rainy I have had the same thing from migration from IR ESA. I am now on CB based New Style ESA and also get UC and the protection for the loss of the disability premium. What this means is you will get one UC payment plus the top up and you will get two new style esa payments. I know in fact you will get 3 payments a month on average. New style ESA every 2 weeks and UC top up every month. So much for the whole rational of having one monthly payment which as it turns out will be 3. Hope this helps 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @rainy Do you qualify for UC? If so you might qualify for an alternative benefit one the proposed Unemployment Insurance Benefit has reached it's time limit. There doesn't appear to be a proposed alternative for claimants not on UC. Legislation for this change has not moved beyond Green Paper stage.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Thank you for all your hard work and for making things easier to understand. Much appreciated.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I do not think there are victorious faces on the Back Benches. I think people on the Government Benches are absolutely heartsick, no matter what side of this debate they are on. They wish that those on the Government Front Bench had not put this forward and that they were not in the position of having to pick a side, because it should never, ever have come down to a Labour Government choosing to make cuts on older people, children in poverty and disabled people as their first matter of business.
    Kirsty Blackman

    Bill Debate 9 July (2.30pm)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Thank you B&W for the update on the 3rd reading and what is going to happen next. I do hope it is not certified as a money bill and that the Lords can make further amendments to the bill. The fight for new applicants goes on for UC and the discussions and consultations for  the Timms review is the next goal post for the disabled community to follow up on so that it is hopefully a more positive thing then most fear at the moment. There is still another bill to be fought for the younger people below the age of 22 which I think is grossly unfair. We are fighting politicians who are more interested in giving tax cuts for the rich then making this a more equal society specially for the sick, disabled, and unemployed in the country so my recommendation to everyone is to register to vote, even for postal voting, and change this government away from the right to a progressive force such as the Greens and LibDems. In as far as the Tories are concerned they are worse than Labour so both these parties should not be supported anymore as they have become anti people. One last word. Disabled people and sick people and unemployed are the working class and they all belong to the families of people who work and pay taxes so the powers that be need to be reminded of this as it is unfair and indeed evil to try and divide them up into neat little slots to attack everyone.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Just read this re: Conservatives Helen Whately withdrawing some of their own measures-  link https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/now/post/63727

    Shadow Secretary of State withdraws amendments to welfare reform bill that proposed limiting benefit awards for people with mild depression, anxiety or ADHD

    With the new welfare reform bill due to be considered at Committee stage and Third Reading in the House of Commons tomorrow, Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Helen Whately had added amendments to yesterday's amendment paper that would:

    preclude a person being a severe conditions claimant for universal credit solely by reference to a lifelong diagnosis of mild depression, anxiety or ADHD (amendment 49); and
    make a person ineligible for a PIP assessment if their mental condition which caused them to apply is mild depression, anxiety or ADHD (amendment 56).
    However, the updated amendment paper issued today confirms that amendments 49 and 56 have been withdrawn.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    My main takeaway is that since the general election we have all been at the mercy of Timms and will continue to be so.

    Timms is according to the House of Commons and the media a highly respected and trusted MP who cares about disabled people and the welfare system. An expert with a great in depth understanding of disability welfare benefits and years of experience as a DWP minister, then as the chair of the DWP select committee and now again a DWP minister. A safe pair of hands to make the disability benefits system better and sustainable.

    Or from my perspective.
    Timms an arrogant prejudiced man who dismisses and wilfully ignores all evidence contrary to his preconceived opinions. Is callous in nature and incompetent. Who despite it being his remit for years has a limited and faulty understanding of the welfare system, how it functions, its history, the reason various benefits and premiums were created and their effects on people's lives. And despite listening to their plight for years has a prejudice view towards people on welfare and disabled people in general. Only seeing a small group that fits his preconceived ideas of severely disabled as truly genuinely deserving of unconditional support. And has a rose tinted view of the DWP and its staff as heroes doing their best. A man who views welfare as overly easy to claim and overly generous, a social evil that indulges idleness and creates dependence, abandons people to the scrap heap and is unfair on hard working taxpayers. Who believes that cutting eligibility and benefit amounts for incapacity/disability benefits and increasing interaction with the DWP are good things And will free people from dependency and lead them to lives with the dignity of work, better health, self respect and the pride of contributing to society, and that they will thank him and sing his praises for his tough love. And this will be his legacy. Saint Timms saviour of disabled people who were told they could not work when in fact they can, its a miracle.

    The idea that the man as I perceive him is going to be swayed from his long held preconceived opinions by talking to disabled people and their organizations from now to Autumn 2026. Is in my opinion ludicrous. The result of the TImms review is a foregone conclusion which is why he was given the job. The opinions of disabled people and their organizations simply do not matter as can be seen from their lack of involvement in the creation of the Pathways to Work green paper, and the Universal Credit and Personal Independence bill. The only opinions that matter are the politicians and their man Timm's.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @John Your description absolutely nails him. There in plain sight, hiding behind whatever his religious beliefs are, and that he goes to church occasionally, whilst at the same time bringing a wrecking ball to the very support that millions rely on and cling to, to just exist.  An awkward cross between Herman Munster and mr bean.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @John His obstinacy (and that of Kendall and Reeves) got him and the government into trouble with this current bill and the result has been enormous political damage. If he shows the same intransigence with the review it's not hard to see another major rebellion kicking off. We will certainly need to put pressure on Labour MPs again to make sure they don't let Timms and co get away with it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @John He'll be in a cosy job in the house of lords by end of it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John You've perfectly captured his ghoulishness and the utter, damning hypocrisy of his 'vision.'
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John Beautifully put. How could an honest appraisal of that fiend be anything other than scathing? Solidarity ✊
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    The can has been kicked down the road. Bury your money you'll need it later.