The DWP have confirmed that speech therapists can carry out personal independence payment (PIP) assessments and work capability assessments (WCA) for claimants with any condition, other than certain neurological ones. 

Earlier this year we published details of a long-hidden report on recruitment and retention of PIP/WCA assessors.  Amongst the information in that report was a suggestion that paramedics could only carry out PIP assessments, not WCAs.

So, we made a Freedom of Information request to the DWP asking if this was still the case and “… if any restrictions are placed on any other type of health assessor by the DWP, as to the type of assessment they can carry out, i.e. PIP or WCA.

“In addition, please supply us with details of any restrictions imposed by the DWP as to the type of condition that any specific category of health professional may work with.”

The  DWP have now confirmed that:

  • Paramedics and pharmacists are only allowed to carry out PIP assessments, not WCAs.
  • For WCAs “there are a number of defined medical conditions, typically neurological in nature, that may only be assessed by Doctors or Physiotherapists.”

Aside from this, any health professional may assess any condition after they have completed their training.

There are currently fewer than 10 speech therapists carrying out assessments, all employed by Capita. But the DWP's desperate shortage of assessors means there may be many more in the future. They would be well placed to assess issues relating to the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as chewing and swallowing.

But a decision maker could also prefer their opinion of the functional abilities of a claimant with, for example, severe Crohn’s disease over that of an NHS  gastroenterologist or bipolar disorder over that of an NHS psychiatrist.

Moreover, at present paramedics and pharmacists are prevented from assessing claimants for eligibility for the limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA), or health element, of universal credit (UC).

But the DWP intends to abolish the WCA, making receipt of the daily living component of PIP the qualifying condition for an award of the health element.  From that point on, those same 270 paramedics and 40 pharmacists who are not considered competent to make assessments for the UC health element, will regularly be doing so.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    Apologies I just thought that I would highlight to the Benefit and Works Team some comments made in a newspaper by a Certain Labour MP in charge at the Cabinet for review of medical conditions. He said that he wants the welfare budget cut to fund military spending ?. I am concerned, stressed and anxious and urge all disabled people to lobby prominent MPS and the House of Lords or mobilise disability organisations to uphold the rights for all disabled people to be treated with fairness, dignity and respect and oppose this. Here is the link to the article concerned. Apologies to one and all. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    If I was designing a system I would just use diagnosis plus medical history indicators to determine eligibility and award level and duration. Using a A to Z of health conditions. Similar to the guide and indicators in the old DLA A to Z of health conditions. But, more comprehensive. Removing all personal opinion and unreliable evidence from the system. Be that what a claimant says or what an assessor thinks. So no room for abuse of the system and no uncertainty on if someone does or does not qualify. Just lots of known health conditions each with their own medical history goal posts people either meet or fail to meet. And such a system could be designed with the input of specialists in each health condition.

    If I wanted to save money on the system. I would make all benefits taxable. And would merge income tax with capital gains tax and get rid of extra tax free allowances on things like interest on savings, dividends, renting out a room in your home, etcetera. So everyone is subject to the same tax system regardless of their sources of income. While there is an equality case for people with more income getting the same disability benefits as someone with less income. And a economic argument for having various extra allowances and different tax rates for different sources of income to encourage desired economic activities. If you are trying to save money in the system in my opinion you should always cut from those with most income first. And removing extra allowances and exemptions from our progressive income tax system is the obvious method to do so.

    If I wanted to further raise tax revenue I would replace council tax and stamp duty with an annual percentage of home value tax paid by the home owner. For those on low incomes unable to pay I would have the option of making the tax a debt at interest secured on the home and transferable if they move home, payable on death of the person or if married death of the person and their surviving spouse.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    Personally, I wouldn't ask them for their job role.

    A few years ago, I was having teeth cleaning with a dental hygienist. Right before the procedure, I just said that this was the first time I had been having dental cleaning with a dental hygienist and that I had it always with my dentist and that I would like to see the difference. Guess what, the hygienist got upset and had refused to give me subsequent appointment, saying that I doubted his skills. As I was paying for my treatment myself, I just went to see another and even better dental hygienist.

    But when it comes to PIP and WCA assessments, we've got no choice in choosing our assessor, and upsetting your assessor right at the beginning of your assessment could backfire on you.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    Are we allowed to ask the assessor what their job/role is in the health profession, before our assessment/reassessment appointment starts?   If their qualifications/job/role has nothing to do with the health conditions/difficulties that I am claiming pip/UC health element for, can I request a health professional that does?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @maggie Personally, I wouldn't ask them for their job role.


      But when it comes to PIP and WCA assessments, we've got no choice in choosing our assessor, and upsetting your assessor right at the beginning of your assessment could backfire on you.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    In a sane country, Doctors, with specific experience of your disease, should be the only people allowed to carry out an assessment, to measure your abilities. 
    Obviously. These are the only people who should be allowed to conduct these assessments. 
    Obviously. 
    But apparently not obvious to the demons inhabiting human skins, in parliament.
    The End. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I don't know why speech therapists and pharmacists are being singled out. Is it really better if say a midwife or a physiotherapist is assessing someone with for example schizophrenia?

    The only reason health professionals are used is to create the veneer of their being an expert medical opinion, and a fraud check. When the assessors are typically not medically qualified to give an expert medical opinion. As they are not usually qualified to diagnose, treat or give a prognosis for the medical conditions of claimants they see.

    DWP disability assessor training is 6 to 12 week. And they have health condition guides that are very brief and often inaccurate and misleading overviews of health conditions. If they even bother to read the guides.

    The assessments are basically a one size fits all exercise of fitting criteria descriptors. Not using straightforward questions on the descriptors set out in legislation. But, using trick questions, and observations to often jump to erroneous conclusions.

    If people are lucky they get awarded based on written evidence and do not get a phone or face to face assessment.

    And at the end of the day it is the DWP decision maker who is supposed to be making the award decision. They are not supposed to be just rubber stamping the opinion of the assessor. They are supposed to look at all the evidence.

    As for the future we do not know what the new post Timm's review PIP assessment will be. It could just be tweaks to the current system or it could be radically different. And we do not know who will be doing the assessments. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @John I'm waiting for my Pip review forms at the moment,got my Pip last time because of COVID but this time am expecting a face to face Assessment.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I always say if I am in a Car Crash I want a Paramedic, but when it comes to my chronic pain and Cerebral Palsy conditions of which a Paramedic has no experience of dealing with. I don't want them assessing me how I manage the PIP Descriptors as they have no experience of these conditions. It's like asking a Bricklayer to wire a house with electrics both work in construction, but they have no clue of the other persons skills or requirements.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I usually don't comment, but the fact they accept virtually anybody to access vulnerable people who relied heavily on the in work and out of work benefit such as pip etc is extremely scary. I've always known some of the pip assessors know close to nothing about my struggles. At 1  assessment which saw my pip reduced Bipolar highs and lows were actually compared to (Feeling the blues), when the assessors hold so much power over the claimants the very least they MUST be is knowledge based and Qualified a Psychiatrist or mental health nurse . You wouldn't allow the lady on the counter at (boots) to hand out hospital diagnosis on any illness or disability. And then they wonder why the amount of Appeals are held up. we all know when the actual medical professionals at the Appeals service, see the actual facts, but by then the vulnerable has suffered not to mention when they get away with this incompetence, saves them a fortune, but again disabled suffer. I hope they never become ill or disabled it's a club I never wanted to join. 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.