The Universal Credit Bill is now certain to become law, after being subject to some very significant amendments which removed all matters relating to personal independence payment (PIP).

However, this is just the start of years of proposed welfare reforms by the Labour government.

We’ve set out some of the major planned changes below.  Over the summer we will be creating a more detailed summary.

Autumn 2025:  Timms PIP assessment review begins work

At this point there is no certainty over whether Timms review of the PIP assessment relates to current claimants or only to new claimants, once the new assessment comes into force.

According to the terms of reference, the review will include will include consideration of:

  • The role of the PIP assessment.
  • The assessment criteria – including activities, descriptors and associated points. The review will consider both the Daily Living and Mobility elements of the PIP assessment.
  • Whether any other evidence should be considered alongside the functional assessment to fairly reflect the impact of living with a long-term health condition or disability, including related to an individual’s personal circumstances and environment.
  • How the PIP assessment could provide fair access to the right support at the right level across the benefits system.
  • What role the assessment could and should play in unlocking wider support

Timms says that he will “engage widely over the summer to design the process for the work of the review, including to ensure that expertise from a range of different perspectives is drawn upon.”

The actual work of the review will begin in the Autumn of 2025. At this stage we have no idea whether the review will share information about its work as it goes along or whether it will be kept confidential until its findings are handed over to the secretary of state in Autumn 2026.

Date TBC:  Pathways To Work  White Paper to be published. 

We don’t have a date for the white paper  yet.  It could be as early as Autumn 2025.  The white paper follows the Green Paper Pathways To Work consultation and should include proposals on:

  • Removing barriers to trying work
  • Supporting people who lose entitlement to PIP
  • Proposed Unemployment Insurance contributory benefit
  • Delaying access to the UC health element until age 22
  • Raising the age at which people can claim PIP to 18

Timms has said in his terms of reference for the review of the PIP assessment that the abolition of the WCA will also be in the white paper.

April 2026:  Universal Credit Act comes into force

The Universal Credit Act will introduce the cuts to the UC health element for new claims, the increases to the UC standard rate and the introduction of the severe conditions criteria as a means of deciding who gets the higher rate of the UC health element.

Autumn 2026: Timms review of the PIP assessment given to the secretary of state

The government has said they want to introduce changes as quickly as possible after the Timms review is completed.  How soon they happen will depend on whether they require primary or secondary legislation or no legislation at all.  But some changes could come in as early as Spring 2027.

2027/28:  Delaying access to the UC health element until age 22

This is one of the issues that was consulted on in the Pathways To Work Green Paper.  We should have more details, including whether Labour intend to go ahead with the proposal, when the White Paper is published.

2028/29:  Abolition of the WCA

The work capability assessment (WCA) is the current test which gives access to the limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) element of universal credit.

The LCWRA element of UC will be replaced for new claimants from April 2026 by the UC health element.

Then, from 2028/29, the WCA will be axed and eligibility for the UC health element will depend upon being in receipt of the daily living component of PIP.

There is currently no certainty about whether current LCWRA claimants who do not receive PIP daily living will be affected by the change.

2028/29: PIP/UC single assessment

At the same time as the WCA is abolished, the new PIP assessment that is created by the Timms review will be introduced if it has not been introduced earlier. This single assessment will give access to both PIP and the health element of UC.

2028/29: New Unemployment Insurance contributory benefit

The Green Paper gave sketchy details of a proposal to replace New Style Employment and Support Allowance (NS ESA) and New Style Jobseeker’s Allowance (NS JSA) with one new Unemployment Insurance benefit. 

We should know more when the White Paper is published.

There is no certainty about how this proposal might affect current claimants.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    2029, general election...and labours out.  Hopefully sooner.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    This article creates unnecessary confusion by stating there is 'no certainty' for existing claimants. During the debates around July 1st, Works and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall gave a direct and specific promise as a key concession: 'any existing Pip claimant will be reassessed under the currrent rules wheneveer their claim is reviewed.' This was a clear commitment to a two-tier system to protect current claimants. To ignore that commitment misrepresents the government's stated position and will cause needless anxiety.

    Frankly, I am sick of Benefits and Work presenting their speculative OPINION as fact, especially when it flies in the face of direct promises made in Parliament. It's irresponsible to frighten vulnerable claimants based on an interpretation when the official word is one of reassurance.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 33 minutes ago
      @Pious @Pious You need to read the debate a bit more carefully.  All the statements by Kendall in relation to existing PIP claimants were about the 4-point rule not ever applying to them, a concession the government had already made the week before.  Timms didn't announce the withdrawal of clause 5, the 4-point rule, until column 219 of the debate.  Kendall didn't give any such undertaking after Timm's statement.  In fact, I'm not sure she even spoke after Timms statement. So, there has been no statement by Kendall about whether the Timms review will apply to existing claimants and certainly no direct promise to protect existing PIP claimants
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    skull duggery, they will do and say the total opposite.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    This will have to go, what  about all those  who have mobility problems? Unless they change or add activities to the pip daily living to include certain criteria from ESA  such as the criteria that qualifies you for the support  group such  as  the incontinence desriptor

    "Then, from 2028/29, the WCA will be axed and eligibility for the UC health element will depend upon being in receipt of the daily living component of PIP."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @tom I fear the government may treat all those with mobility problems as being able to work from home. So no UC health element. As UC health wouod according to the government provide a perverse incentive to not work. And UC health also results in being exempt from conditionality, except for support conversations, so according to the government being abandoned to the scrap heap.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Does anybody know if the 13 week transitional pip payment, if you lose your pip award on review, is still happening? I think it was one of kendalls 1st concessions, or is that going to be down to Timms review now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @maggie No.  It's not happening.  It was just a way to try to appease backbenchers. Never formally introduced. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @maggie Not happening now as the entire PIP section of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill was removed and the bill renamed the Universal Credit Bill.

      If the Timms review PIP changes only apply to new claims it will also not be happening with the Timms review changes. As the point of the 13 week delay was so existing PIP recipients who lost their PIP due to the assessment system changing had time to get other support (what support they were supposed to be able to get was never clarified). 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Thank you for all your updates.  They are incredibly helpful. 

    I am very concerned about the Timms Review.  This article by Vox Political states that the Government has not legal obligation to implement the results of the Timms Review i.e. They can still go ahead with the PIP 4-point rule.  The clause which would have ensured this was not the case was not supported by MPs.  Can you confirm this?


    Do you know when the results of the Green Paper Consultation will be published?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    In the Commons debates Ministers repeatedly told MPs that existing PIP claimants will remain under the current rules, and the new system will only apply to new claimants. And Labour MPs are telling concerned constituents that is what will happen. If the government reneges on this they are likely to suffer a big rebellion again. As the original plan of changing PIP eligibility criteria for existing claimants and so causing them to lose PIP, was the main cause of the rebellion.

    I do not think the government can get away with claiming they only meant the 4 point PIP rule not any changes to descriptors and points made by Timms. As that requires MPs believing Ministers were too thick to understand the questions they were asked and were inadvertently misleading. Rather than being deliberately obtuse to intentionally mislead. Which would cause a lot of bad faith. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 57 minutes ago
      @John John
      I’ve written to my MP  to raise this. She stated last week that we would be protected as current claimants and that because of this and other issues she felt able to support the bill. After this came the next bill now just universal credit. I’ve raised there is confusion now especially with Benefits and Work giving no indication either of who now this effects particularly after all the claims it was new claims only by Liz Kendall. I think the question needs answered.. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @John It was clear that it was the 4 point rule it referred to as that was what was in the bill.  With that rule axed, so was that concession.  You can't keep a concession to an element no longer in the bill.  

      Which is why i said at the time that the final capitulation on the 4 point rule left all 375,000 current claimants with no security going forward.  But was told that I was being selfish in saying that because of the new claimahts who might suffer.  OK, the likelihood is that any rule changes will be current claims only after the curfuffle last week.  But I doubt that will be true of changes to the form and descriptors. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago

    I do not think the government can get away with claiming they only meant the 4 point PIP rule not any changes to descriptors and points made by Timms. As that requires MPs believing Ministers were too thick to understand the questions they were asked and were inadvertently misleading. Rather than being deliberately obtuse to intentionally mislead. Which would cause a lot of bad faith. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @John Liz Kendall's letter was clear.  Its about the changes that have now been axed.  Notiing beyond that was ever mentioned:

      "Firstly, we recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety.

      Therefore, we will ensure that all of those currently receiving Pip will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Ok folks, work on the Timms review begins in a few months. From now until then, whilst we have no say on the criteria yet, make sure to hound MPs and disability organisations about Current Claimant Protection (CCP). Do not ask them, TELL them that Current Claimant Protection is a must and is fair as it has been for many years now.

    Failure to tell MPs and disability organisations this will only result in Current Claimants PIP benefits being cut.

    Go forth and make the future happen. Be wise and make the future happen. Be stern and make the future happen.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @JHF NO.  don't hound them. Constantly writing to MPs is  just going to get them ignoring us, and viewing us as a pain in the butt.  We have to choose our moment and this is not it.  Current claimants protection is not even within the remit of the report - it only comes into play when the changes are brought before the Commons. That's going be at least sixteen months away.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    It is quite clear that we cannot trust the red tory government to consult with disabled people and DPO's in good faith considering the recent sham 'consultation' over the proposed cuts to PIP/UC. Having said this, we need to campaign hard and put the government under pressure over its promise for 'genuine co-production'. I suspect that the Timms review will be used a Trojan horse to try and bring in cuts to PIP via other means. I was talking to a CAB benefits advisor of over 30 years standing and he told me that he and other colleagues strongly suspect that someone in CAB has been giving the government advice on how to cut disability benefits.
    As someone on contribution based ESA I am very concerned by the proposal for a time limited unemployment insurance. I suspect that this would seek to dump us into claiming means tested UC with all the drawbacks which would ensue from this.
    We really need to reach out to the unions for their support over the next period as we campaign against further attacks on benefits.
    Lastly, we need to keep up the demand for the government to abandon benefit sanctions which have contributed to the deaths of so many disabled people as chronicled by John Pring's heart breaking book, The Department - How A Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @bronc Sir Stephen Timms reaction to that book was to delay the end of a Commons work and pensions committee evidence session to deliver a statement defending the DWP against the accusations in the book. At the time he was not a DWP minister. He was chair of the DWP select committee supposed to hold the DWP to account. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @bronc
      It is horrible that there may be a "scab" at a senior level in CAB, history teaches us there is always a betrayer in each resistance group...however, there are also the opposite numbers eg whistle blowers...and the good CAB experts...and it is public pressure that got us the concessions so far...we can and will keep going, and yes to the unions getting on board. And dumping the evil sanctions. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    What happens if you are on ESA in they haven't transferred you to UC by April 26? Will you then be considered a new claimant?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @lonewolf6565 Those like me on CB ESA who are not being transferred have even less idea what "group" they plan to put us in. Will we all be moved to  this new time limited Employment Insurance based on the fact we have had our stamp paid and then pushed into the Health Element if UC and counted as new Health claims?

      I suspect we will be where the big cuts are made. The irony being that the majority of us were placed on SDA when it was created because we were either long term sick adults or as in my case kids who had been born disabled and whose conditions would only worsen with age.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Doc That's the question isn't it. We know sod all as per usual and just have to wait for the white paper/review conclusion. I wish they knew or even cared how much this uncertainty and fear is destroying people
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Doc Migration is due to end in March 2026. Unless that target is missed, there won't be an answer to your question.  But its unlikely the target will be missed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Doc No worries on this one, they will have transferred you by then, they are aiming to do all the migrations by the end of this year.