The DWP has today published the details of the twelve members of the Timms review steering group and many people will be disappointed at the make-up of the panel.  

The chosen group of high-achievers will doubtless have much experience and knowledge to offer and almost all  have lived experience of disability or long-term health conditions. But ordinary claimants struggling to make ends meet and deal with DWP bureaucracy seem to be almost entirely, if not entirely, unrepresented.

The short biographies given below also do not seem to list anyone who has had a career specifically in welfare benefits advocacy, who would be in a strong position to challenge the DWP on the technical and legal aspects of any proposed changes.

As well as announcing the committee members, the DWP have revealed that the Public Service Consultants and the West of England Centre for Inclusive Living will oversee the delivery of co-production.

The steering group have already had their first introductory call and the next few weeks will see:

  • the first formal steering group meetings
  • the beginning of detailed co-production and policy work in February
  • preparation for a wider, fully accessible programme of engagement beyond the steering group, starting in the spring

The members of the steering group are as follows:

Dr Mark Brookes MBE is currently the Advocacy Lead for Dimensions UK. He has more than 30 years’ experience in publicly advocating for people with learning disabilities and autism and campaigning against hate crime. Mark works with the Churchill Foundation, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the NHS Advisory Board, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Home Office, and UK Police forces.

George Fielding BEM is a disability rights advocate who has worked nationally across many public services, with operational expertise in youth work, social care, and community capacity building. He has previously co-founded two CQC-regulated social care providers whilst initiating and developing three youth-led social movements, working to develop intergenerational best practice in social change. He is non-executive advisor to three community interest companies which specialise in co-production.

Tara Flood is a long-time disability rights activist, having worked at a local, national and international level. She is currently Head of Co-production at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. She champions the Social Model of Disability, working with residents to drive policy change and the redesign and delivery of services at a local level.

Mark Fosbrook is a retired Paralympic athlete who brings his own lived experience, and constantly draws on knowledge from others through a person-centred, values-led mindset. As Disability Inclusion Manager at West Midlands Combined Authority, he is driven by advocating for empowering the voices of others, championing change in Transport, Housing, Employment, Health and Social Care.

Ben Geiger is a Professor at King’s College London, and brings academic expertise as well as experience in policy development (including from within the Department for Work and Pensions) and co-production. He currently leads the Welfare Experiences project (comparing how it feels to claim benefits in five countries), and previously co-led the major rapid response study of benefits during COVID-19.

Katrina Gilman is a passionate advocate for disability equality, drawing on lived experience of multiple disabilities and her role as a carer. After 25 years in policing, she now works to break down barriers and champion fairness, accessibility, and opportunity—driving change that empowers disabled people to thrive.

Jean-André Prager has an extensive policy background in PIP and broader disability issues. He was previously the Prime Minister’s Special Adviser covering the Department for Work and Pensions and is currently a Senior Fellow at Policy Exchange and a Director at Flint Global.

Dr Lucy Reynolds is a social entrepreneur, public speaker and disability rights advocate. Founder of We Are All Disabled CIC and Chair of Disability North, she champions an Affirmative approach to disability, using lived experience and academic research to challenge perceptions and drive inclusive cultural change.

Dr Felix Shi brings lived experience as a disabled academic, alongside comparative insights into disability policy across multiple national contexts. As a former board member of Disability Wales and a current member of the Arfon Access Group, Felix works to connect policymakers with grassroots DPOs in Wales.

Dr Dharshana Sridhar is Head of Public Affairs at the Spinal Injuries Association, representing the voices of people with spinal cord injuries nationally. With lived experience as a long-term carer and extensive UK government and international policy expertise, she works to shape fair social security policy and champion the rights, dignity and independence of disabled people and marginalised communities.

Phil Stevens is Chief Executive of Disability Action Haringey and Chair of the Board of Trustees of Disability Action in Islington. He is a disabled leader with extensive experience in user-led advocacy, policy, and strategic development, working to advance rights, access, and inclusion for D/deaf and inclusive events for disabled young people in the UK, and former Director of Autistic Knowledge Development in Scotland, she brings expertise in creating inclusive spaces disabled people across London. [As published by the DWP, but the last part of this biography appears to relate to Leila Talmadge, below]

Leila Talmadge is an autistic and dyslexic project manager and designer. As the former Chair of the Board of Trustees at Daytrippers charity, which provides inclusive events for disabled young people in the UK, and former Director of Autistic Knowledge Development in Scotland, she brings expertise in creating inclusive spaces.

You can read the full Timms update here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I’ve got mixed feelings about this selection.

    These are obviously ppl at the top of their fields - but I do have to point that ppl at the top don’t necessarily come from just upper case or privileged backgrounds - so unless someone’s going to look up the childhood or education of these 10 individuals it’s unfair to say there is zero in common.

    And we knew that the likes of McFadden and Timms sees most disabled as stereotypical low iq bugs to be quashed so they were never going to listen to the average disabled person so perhaps it’s better the panel is top of their fields as in theory these ministers may be more likely to take on board what they say (of course that’s if this board were not picked because of their shared views with MPs that are going out of their way to make a disabled life difficult - obviously I have no clue of the 10’s personal viewpoints)

    I do think the gov/dwp should of launched a true consultation (not one where all the questions answers were predetermined) for disabled ppl that ran between jan to June/July where we could share our thoughts and ideas of disabled welfare awards and support for disabled in workspace and in society - which could then be read/considered before the timms report is published this autumn.

    But the govs main priority seems to remain saving money by cutting the welfare bill (the problem is there are not enough jobs to go around but the gov want disabled claimants rather than abled bodied unemployed to take them as our uc awards are higher (and some of of us get pip also - though ministers still can’t grasp that pip is intended to be both an in & out of work benefit award and trying to take away pip once in work goes against its purpose) so the dwp would in theory save more money - that’s why we’ve been pushed to the front line.

    So my problem isn’t with this panel but with the uneducated timms & McFadden - which even though they’ve both demonstrated several times they have zero understanding of the welfare system and the limitations of individual disabilities I will put money on them ignoring every sensible points these boards may make (thinking they already know it all) and go ahead with the plan of tightening the criteria of what it is to be disabled and deserving of state help (shouldn’t expect more of 2 men who look like offspring of the grim reaper!)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @D AS Marx once said conditions determine consciousness. Rayner and Streeting live very privileged lives and by their actions it is clear that they are on the side of the super rich. Both have voted for cuts to benefits and against taking any action against the wealth of the super rich. It's not about personalities, its about their support for an economic system which is designed to maintain the upwards transfer of wealth to the top 1%. Raynor and Streeting support the privatisation of the NHS and other public services. They support anti trade union policies  ie strike breaking and hence why my union Unite stripped Raynor of her union membership. Never mind their support for the assault of civil liberties which is taking place in this country from the FEAR Act to facial recognition to proscribing members of a  peaceful protest group as a 'terrorists' in contravention of international law and the European Convention on Human Rights. These people also support the governments  racist immigration policies. I could go on. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @bronc I think you’ve misunderstood a few of my points I was trying to make:

      Firstly a person can move up or down class status throughout their lives - both raynor and streeting grew up in difficult working class environments but raynor has maintained the working class stereotypes and streeting not so much though both are now financially privileged. Unless you know the early backgrounds of these 10 you don’t know if they have any lived experience of working class, poverty and yes that brown envelope that lives rent free in many disabled ppl nightmares. It’s unfair to stereotype someone this way if you don’t have all their background information

      As has been mentioned by a few here many current disabled claimants didn’t put their names forward for this board as they were frightened they’d lose their awards as a consequence down the line (and I don’t think may of us would of been happy if we’d been picked and our names and ‘cv’ been published - at a time disabled ppl are unpopular with many of public this would of put a dangerous target on backs even in our local communities) - bottom line is most current disabled claimants don’t feel that their lcwra/pip awards are 100% secure and applying to be on this board and being successful may have risked their entire income so I’m not convinced a board made up with several current disabled working class claimants was ever a Realistic possibility 

      Disabled and disability has the unfortunate stereotype of being ‘stupid’ (the number of times someone has labelled me as r****ded when they’ve found out I’m autistic) - it would be no surprise if timms/mcfadden shared this view and timms has shown much contempt to the ordinary disabled person that Prehaps he may take on board what an mbe/obe says (what is unclear is whether under the surface these 10 board members are familiar with the struggles of all classes of disabled ppl)

      This timms report panel was never going to offer true co-production with the disabled community which is why I made the point of a true consultation running for 6 months where all of us could share opinions if we so choosed 

      I’m sorry many of you were angry with my last post (and probably this one) but I had to take a step back and look at the hierarchy of uk society & ruling class on this one - but for those on here that have always been working class that will be difficult, the same way those who have always been a part of more privileged classes have trouble emphasising with those with less fortunate circumstances 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @D Sorry I have to strongly disagree. These people do not speak for me. What do they know about living in fear of a brown envelope through the door, or struggling to pay bills or having to deal with the demonisation of us disabled claimants by the media and Labour politicians? What experience do they have of navigating the minefield that is our benefits system yet they will be making decisions that affect millions of us.  This is not co production when none of the panel includes working class people on means tested benefits. We live in a society where working class people are marginalised from the institutions of our society.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    So who is going to fight the good fight for us impoverished disabled and mentally ill people? By the looks of it PIP will soon be gone as will the disabled aspect of UC. We will just be added to the growing number of homeless statistics, we are the lowest of the low to all these privileged people.  I have just come out of hospital after being sectioned and now im losing my house and will be on  the street by next week with no help or care. I have Bipolar disorder, psychosis, autism, diabetes type one, hypertension and stomach issues but no help and soon to be on the streets because of being sectioned. No help from my local authority as they say i don't qualify for help as i don't fit the criteria. So please use this as a cautionary tale, this could be you, this most defiantly will be if this government gets it s way with our benefits system.  I am also using this to say good bye to the people who have been kind to me on here. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Kevin How long were you sectioned for? Do you have access to a Welfare Rights Worker as part of the Community Mental Health Team? if you are faced with homelessness 'The Team' will liaise with the Homelessness Prevention Initiative (or equivalent) within the Mental Health Trust.  Were you held on the acute ward for more than 12 months and housing benefit was stopped, and consequently, you have rent arrears with no means of clearing them? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @bronc Yeah but they've got to be bit stupid to imagine ex public schoolboy/banker/pro fox hunting creep Farage has their interests at heart. Farage detests the working class and esp. disabled, so how these gullible people fall for his rubbish about "change" is beyond me. The only "change" he cares about is making the rich richer and picking on the most vulnerable. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Kevin This is a class issue and these people have been picked by the establishment to exclude working class voices. How can we expect these people to fight for our rights when they don't live in the world we live in or have any idea what it is like to be a disabled claimant? No wonder millions of working class people are voting Reform when they are excluded time and again by the establishment.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Kevin @Kevin it won’t be gone autism psychosis bi polar disorder should be enough to get it ok it might be a bit tougher and theirs the severe conditions route too and lcwra might be extended a little bit longer for exaiating claimants 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Kevin @Kevin You qualify for band A housing sectioned and no fault homeless you will be number 1 in the queue right away just get yourself on the registar  at your local social housing provider and start bidding Angela is also correct what she said below me too
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Wow all us impoverished disabled and mentally ill people from working class backgrounds feel well represented, by these privileged people. This is just another form of class warfare, this time the wealthy who "represent" us form backgrounds they couldn't even imagine as usual sit in judgment. 

    Being poor with a disability and mental health problems or disorders is hell, far worse than these wealthy people could ever understand. We are not represented and realistically no one really gives a damn. You're a drone to pay taxes so the rich don't have to and if by a disability or mental health problems you can't your're viewed as the lowest of the low, by the government, the press and those who are privileged and then they encourage the rest of the population to do the same.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    'Successful' people. Successful 'disabled' people. The exceptional, most able and consequently privileged examples of all people, assessing the needs and capability of the least able. You can see the ladder being hauled up by strong arms.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Nobody with expertise in mental illness. Shocking and very worrying.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    "Disabled people will have their voices at the centre of the first ever comprehensive review of Personal Independence Payment (PIP). The group of appointed members will bring lived experience of disability or long-term health conditions as well as direct experience of working within Disabled People’s Organisations."

    A quick google search of the group.

    Jean-André Prage. Former special advisor on the DWP to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. Not sure but going by Google does not appear to be disabled. Senior Fellow, Policy Exchange and Director, Flint Global. Policy exchange wants PIP for those aged 16-30 to be conditional on engaging in looking for work, engaging in further education or training, volunteer work.

    Dr Ben Geiger Ph.D. Professor of Social Science and Health at King's College London. Former policy advisor to the DWP under the Tory government. Not sure but going by Google does not appear to be disabled. Co-leads work, welfare reform and mental health programme, and co-leads the welfare experience project.

    Dr Dharshana Sridhar, medical doctor. Independent advisor to the UK government. Lived experience as a long-term carer. Head of Public Affairs, Spinal Injuries Association.

    Katrina Gilman. Lived experience of multiple disabilities. National Officer for Disability Equality, UNISON (Labour affiliated union which is one of the largest donors to the Labour party)

    Dr Felix Shi Ph.D. Has visual impairment. Lecturer in Management, Bangor University. Works to understand the experience of disabled people to provide a voice for those less represented in academia. Former board member of Disability Wales and current member of the Arforn Access Group. Seeks to connect policy makers with grassroots DPOs. Comparative insights into disability policy across multiple national contexts.

    Dr Lucy Reynolds Ph.D. Has cerebral palsy. Chair of Board of Trustees, Disability North, and Founder, We Are All Disabled CIC. Public speaker and social entrepreneur. Works with the Affirmative model of disability which celebrates difference and the unique skills and attributes that disabled people bring to the workplace and wider society.

    Dr Mark Brookes MBE, honorary doctorate. Has a learning disability. Advocacy lead for Dimensions UK, checking people are supported in a personalised way. Public speaker and campaigner on disability hate crime and for people with learning disabilities and autism to be treated equally.

    George Fielding BME . Wheelchair user with cerebral palsy. Disability rights advocate and Non-Executive Advisor, social care entrepreneur. Campaigns for wheelchair users.

    Dr Mark Fosbrook, honorary doctorate. Paralympic wheelchair volleyball, rugby and international wheelchair basketball gold winner. Exemplar for engaging disabled people and those with long term health conditions to be physically active. Disability Inclusion Manager, West Midlands Combined Authority

    Tara Flood. Paralympic Gold medal winning swimmer, Head of Co-production, London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. Campaigns for inclusion in education, champions the social model of disability.

    Phil Stevens, CEO, Disability Action Haringey, and Chair of the Board of Trustees, Disability Action in Islington. Advance rights, access and inclusion for deaf and disabled people.

    Leila Talmadge. Autistic and dyslexic. Founder and former Director, Autistic Knowledge Development CIC. Improving the lives and opportunities of autistic people.


    So just your average everyday disabled people like you would have expected from the DWP asking the general public to apply. Not. Why did they even bother to ask the general public to apply? When they have appointed former government and DWP advisors, a representative of a big Labour affiliated union, people with Ph.Ds, people with honours MBE, BME, Paralympic athletes, a CEO and a founder and director of an organization. These do not seem like typical Joe Average everyday lived experience people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @John Re Tara Flood. I lived in Hammersmith and Fulham for decades and wasn't aware of ANYONE there working on social and housing reform for people with disabilities, so she's clearly doing a great job. She'll be as useful as a bra on a hamster! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @John Rik has pointed out Phil Stevens is a former co-chair of the LibDem disability group.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @John Exactly, it proves what utter BS this whole co-production process is. It is clear that this panel will be the fig leaf used by the government to make cuts to PIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @John It seems unethical to pick multiple ppl with a prior working relationship with this gov or any previous gov

      I’m I being unfair or do I have a point?

      I’m sure more will be dug up in coming weeks but your research above does show early signs of a stitch up.

      Govs already made the mistake of thinking even with our large numbers we won’t make noise - they look to be making the next mistake of presuming we are all stupid & gullible when the reality is we probably research the most of all uk social groups
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @John Thank you as always John for bringing in that really good reality check & summary so it can all be seen in one place. In my honest opinion, it feels like the very worst sham. I particularly dislike the way they have appointed 12 people, as if they are the 12 disciples and it brings with the spirit of Christianity. And as a Christian myself, I cannot begin to tell you how far I feel this is from being Christian. In my honest personal opinion, there could be nothing more heinous than dressing up cutbacks to some of the most vulnerable people in our society in some sort of fake altruism that pretends to be enabling them in someway via those cutbacks,  and which conflates  work with good health. It is one of the most Dickensian pieces of damaging tripe I’ve had to be exposed to. Whomever voted Labour  and did not see this coming fand I don’t think any of the other parties would be better and many of them worse), it is extremely frightening to think that there is not one government that is not trying to flush disabled people down the toilet. What is also increasingly worrying is the divide and conquer approach. The oldest political trick in the book. In my honest opinion, I believe it’s so none of us - in our panic -look to tax the super Rich. Please do look to - because the Patriotic  millionaires and tax justice UK are campaigning hard for that to happen, including backed up by Oxfam who have waded in today. But far more importantly is that the disabled must not start fighting amongst themselves because it’s like ‘The Hunger Games’. No disability is worse than any other disability and yes invisible disabilities do seem to be the ones that disappear from the agenda the most and I think these people will be the ones to be very quickly dispensed with. Invisible disabilities do not engender the same compassion that physical ones do. But there I go falling for that very trick… This is one of the most disgraceful, and I say that with Christian connotations, shams I have ever seen. They may have the power to do it, but I think it will have a pile of costly unintended consequences including the fall of this Labour government. Squeezing blood out of the stone of disabled people will not solve this society‘s problems. Now. Or ever.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Nothing for those with sensory impairments and diabetes ....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @John Just done a very quick search. “Oh hello, I’m in the Daily Mail. I blame Jo Shaw.” dated 4th March 2013 has him listed a Lib Dem Disability Association Chair. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Rik I can find Phil Stevens was the Co-Chair of the Liberal Democrat Disability Association (LDDA) 2018-2020.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @John I believe he was chair of the Lib Dem disability group during the coalition government, so I wouldn't get your hopes up!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @John Thanks for correcting me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Matt Phil Stevens, CEO, Disability Action. Advance rights, access and inclusion for deaf and disabled people.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Jean-Andre Prager. From Flint Global, which advises international companies and investors on issues such as tax, asset management and mergers.

    “Jean-André advises on UK policy and politics.
    He was the Prime Minister’s Special Adviser in the Downing Street Policy Unit for Rishi Sunak (2022-2024) covering both the Department for Work and Pensions and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Previous to this, he served as the Prime Minister's Special Adviser for the Department for Work and Pensions for both Boris Johnson (2019-2022) and Theresa May (2018-2019). He was a core member of the Conservative Party manifesto team in both 2019 and 2024 and was involved in numerous budgets and spending reviews.

    From Wikipedia on Policy Exchange, where Prager is a senior fellow: Policy Exchange is a British conservative think tank based in London. In 2007 it was described in The Daily Telegraph as "the largest, but also the most influential think tank on the right". Policy Exchange is a registered charity; it mostly refuses to disclose the sources of its funding and is ranked as one of the least transparent think tanks in the UK. It was founded in 2002 by the Conservative MPs Francis Maude and Archie Norman, and by Nick Boles, who later also became a Tory MP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Dan Thanks for doing this research. Does anyone have the energy to do some research on the other members?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Dan There's a glowing example of how the Timms review committee is designed to con everyone into thinking that co-production has been involved in drawing up the new PIP system. Yet here we have a blue Tory, who has participated in decisions which have harmed claimants, as one of its advisors!!
      I think the disabled community should boycott the work of this sham committee. How can you have a committee, whose work will affect the lives of millions of people, not have one person who is actually a claimant? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I have to say I don’t feel very represented by any of the above.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.