PIP impact assessment

A PIP impact assessment has now been published.


UC rates

The Bill provides for above inflation increases in the standard rate of UC, from 2.3% above inflation in 2026/27 to 4.8% above inflation in 2029/30.

However, the LCWRA rate will be frozen from 2026/27 to 2029/30.

The LCWRA element rates for the 2026/27 tax year will be:

  • pre-2026 claimant  £423.27
  • severe conditions criteria claimant  £423.27
  • claimant who is terminally ill  £423.27
  • any other claimant with limited capability for work and work-related activity £217.26
Severe conditions criteria - no private doctor diagnoses allowed.

The Bill provides that claimants who meet the severe conditions criteria for UC will never have to have another reassessment and will be paid the higher rate of UC health element of £97 per week.

The criteria are essentially the descriptors for being found to have LCWRA for UC - we cover this in more detail in "How the severe conditions criteria work" on this page - with four further requirement:

  • The individual’s level of function will always meet LCWRA
  • The individual’s condition will last for the rest of their life
  • There is no realistic prospect of recovery of function, and
  • The condition has been diagnosed by an appropriately qualified healthcare professional in the course of the provision of NHS services.

That last bullet appears to mean that an adult living in an area where they will have to wait literally years for an NHS assessment of say ADHD or autism will not be able to pay for a private assessment and have that accepted for the purpose of getting the higher rate of UC health element.


"one of the most generous ever"

The DWP press release boasts that:

"The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will provide 13-weeks of additional financial security to existing claimants affected by changes to the PIP daily living component, including those who their lose eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer’s element of Universal Credit.

"The 13-week additional protection will give people who will be affected by the changes time to adapt, access new, tailored employment support, and plan for their future once they are reassessed and their entitlement ends.

"This transitional cover is one of the most generous ever and more than three times the length of protection provided for the transition from DLA to PIP."


Press release from the DWP

The DWP have issued  a press release headed "Welfare bill will protect the most vulnerable and help households with income boost".  It quotes Liz Kendall as saying:

"This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.

"This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot - putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change."


PIP changes in the Bill

The 4-point rule and the 13 week run-on if you lose your PIP because of it are confirmed.  Plus a clause which could be used to allow for pension age PIP claimants to be exempt from the 4-point rule

Clause 5 deals with PIP.  

Subsection 1 confirms the requirement to:

score at least 8 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the standard rate;

score at least 12 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the enhanced rate.

In other words, the 4-point rule.

Paragraph 6 (c) confirms that PIP will be payable for 13 weeks after a decision that you are no longer entitled to PIP daily living component as a result of failing the 4-point rule.

Subsection 2 says that the secretary of state (SoS) will decide the date on which the new rules begin.  The explanatory notes add that this is intended to be November 2026.  The change will not apply to any given claimant until their award is reassessed.  So for claimants with longer awards it may be some years distant - by which time there may be an entirely new PIP test.

Subsection 4 appears to be a "get-out clause" to allow the SoS to make special provisions for particular groups of people.  They almost certainly have pension age PIP claimants in mind here.  The paragraph actually says:

"to make different provision for different cases or purposes (including different provision for persons of different ages);"

So, for example, it might allow the SoS to decide that the 4-point rule will never apply to any person at or over pension age, who is already in receipt of PIP daily living in November 2026.   This would give pension age claimants an exemption, but it's interesting that this is not being put into the Act itself.

The subsection also allows the secretary of state to provide for "a person to exercise discretion in dealing with any matter".  

 

Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill published

The bill has now been published.  You can download the 22 page .pdf document from the Get file link on this page.

Or you can download the file directly from this link

You can download the explanatory notes from this page

There's also an impact assessment on the Universal Credit Rebalancing from the Department for Work and Pensions - May 2025


Money Bill

There has been discussion about whether Labour will seek to have this bill designated as a money bill, which would effectively remove House of Lords scrutiny.  A decision about whether a bill is a money bill is made by the Speaker of the House, after the report stage.  However, according to guidance on Money Bills from the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel: 

1.35 During the debates in 1911 it was alleged to be a defect in the bill that the Speaker was not required to make his decision earlier because of the risk of the Commons proceedings being completed in ignorance of whether the bill was to be certified. There is now an informal indication, published as a note when the Bill is listed on the Commons Order Paper, as to whether a bill is likely to be certified as a money bill.

The notice that the bill will be presented today on the Order Paper makes no mention of a money bill, so this seems to be an indication - though not a certainty - that Labour are not pursuing this possibility.


Bill due this afternoon

The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to be published this afternoon.  This is the bill that will enable the introduction of the PIP 4-point rule and cuts to universal credit for disabled claimants.

We’ll provides links, analysis and the opportunity for you to comment on this page.

According to the UK parliament website, it is a:  "Bill to make provision to alter the rates of the standard allowance, limited capability for work element and limited capability for work and work-related activity element of universal credit and the rates of income-related employment and support allowance, and to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment."

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    What's the point in existing anymore. It's just the government handing out a death sentence for so many disabled people, myself included. I haven't been awarded any 4 points on anything even though I should have. They will take away my PIP and lwrca. I can't work I'm bed bound a majority of the day 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Ness I'm sorry to hear this Ness as I am also in same  oat as you as well as being a pensioner it's so sad that this country has came to this 😢 good luck in the future 🤗🫂
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    This has been put in a way that makes it appear as if this law has already been passed. It also uses the words "alter" and "restrict", again greatly minimising the catastrophic effect these so called "reforms" No amount of weasel words will cover what will come if this goes too far. It is neither benign or inevitable. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I'm so afraid, I'm 63. I live on my PIP money. If these changes go ahead, I don't know how I will eat, pay bills, or keep a roof over my head between then and until I get my old age pension. I'll be 64 when the changes come in. I worked full time until I couldn't. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Hi we see how it goes but I cant see it going through mp  will not back this and we did not vote for this in the general election last year have hope disabled people we need it 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So we have the big question: does the mention of PIP eligibility rules mean it is not just a money bill? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Slb It looks more like a Money Bill than it did. The Bill is more limited than I expected. Remember, it's up to the Speaker to say whether it's a Money Bill or not. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    We need to do something as a country, this government is running us into the ground, this should not be tolerated any longer
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Cathedral city You're right,I watched good morning britain this morning, there was a woman slating all pip claimants as lyers and basically thieves,she said she knows loads playing the system and she works 49 hours and can't afford a holiday, they are stupidly short sighted, but also many people are when it comes to understanding matters that don't affect them or what they only think they know or understand about said matter, you only have to look on tiktok to prove that,the comments people are making are from some very uneducated and Im Sorry to say " thick " individuals who obviously have no comprehension of what the government actually want to do and rhat it will cost lives ,not to mention no-one is talking about the linkage if 3 benefits and a loss if 1 is a loss of all 3,makes me absolutely livid!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @David Yes agree with you totally. This is not about saving money, this is a personal attack on every pip claimant.
      The govenment have attacked just about everyone right across the board.
      This is about reeking misery and financial hardships on everyone.
      It's designed austerity...

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @David Honestly, I think the majority of the people in this country are all for these cuts, except those who are affected by them. People aren't that sympathetic towards anyone on benefits.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    What’s happening with the mobility element of PIP? What if someone qualifies for that but not the personal care element after the planned cuts, will they still be expected to find work? This isn’t really mentioned
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Lucy72 @Lucy72. yes you would be expected to attend fortnightly meetings with a work coach in your local job centre, spend 35 hrs per week searching for work, attend job fairs and work courses, as well as accept any job or unpaid work placements offered to you. failure to comply with any of these could result in you being sanctioned and losing upto all your unemployment benefit for upto 6mths. mobility element is completely separate to to the daily living element and doesn't shield you if you fail the new 4 point scoring criteria for PIP Daily Living element 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Lucy72 No you wouldn't have too look for work.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Lucy72 The proposal as it stands is that in future in order to be eligible for LCWRA you would have to be in receipt of the daily living element so yes, even though the mobility descriptors are not changing, it will not be enough to protect you from work related activity and sanctions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Lucy72 I don’t know it is very confusing. Let’s hope someone replies  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Lucy72 Yes, they will, because apparently not being able to walk doesn't qualify you for the health element of UC.  I think/hope this might be an area where an amendment could be added. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    They are pushing all of us towards UC so that it is easier to push us into employment despite most of us not being able to work. Cuts to UC for those claiming disability is just another attack, just like they attacked the pensioners. Unfortunately, there seems to be a lot more support for pensioners from pressure groups aka lobbyists and those on disability do not. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Still no mentiin from DWP of those aporoaching pension age who will lose PIP etc and how they figure they will be able to find a pathway to work whilst being ill/ disabled and within a couple of years or less of claiming pension. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Shelley Have you made provision for yourself.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Pinkicecream I'm in the same boat. Worked 41yrs till too I'll and have been disabled for years and now labour are trying to distract opinions away from these cuts with other issues. I'm 5 1/2yrs away from Government pension how the hell do i live? This Government are such liars and incredibly sneaky.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    This is such a scary time . I hate and diaper how many this will harm
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    'No debate' and 'without any question being put'. Says it all.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John I look forward to that, then! I was reminded of their not consulting on the pip measures.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @keepingitreal Our democracy is non existent 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @keepingitreal This is the normal for the 1st Reading of any Bill 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @keepingitreal That is normal for a first reading. It is at the second reading a bill gets debated. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So vile. Starmer said yesterday ''these reforms are for the good of the claimants and the taxpayers'', I fail to see how pushing me into abject poverty is for the ''good'' of me. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tss91 Since this was announced I've been referred for yet more therapy, had my already high meds increased and have massively increased self harm. 
      So my mental health is much worse and I'm costing the taxpayer more through treatment 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tss91 Thing is, there are a fair number of MPs who see through that faux-moral claim, and just repeating it again and again will never make it true. I remember reading a couple of weeks ago that even the Tories think the Green Paper measures are cruel! Yes, they said they would theoretically go further, but they also said this isn't the way to do it. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Benefits cuts will be mentioned in parliament today.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.