The Universal Credit Bill has completed its passage through he House of Lords in a single session, with an amendment critical of the impact of the legislation heavily defeated

Because it was certified as a “money bill, the Lords have no power to prevent the Universal Credit Bill becoming law, or even to make changes to it.

However, an amendment to the bill was voted on which, whilst accepting that it should have its second reading, also “regrets the impact of the Bill, particularly with regard to age discrimination, the impact on people with high levels of need and mental health conditions, and the overall impact on rates and severity of poverty among people with disabilities, and notes the human rights concerns expressed by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.”

Had the amendment succeeded, it would have been a rebuke to the Commons for creating such an unfair law.

In the event, however, the amendment was defeated with just 17 votes in favour and 120 against.  Those in favour were mainly LibDems, with a few crossbench peers.  116 Labour MPs voted against, along with three Conservatives and a bishop.

You can see a full breakdown of the votes here.

The bill completed has now completed its second reading, committee stage, report stage and third reading in the Lords and just awaits royal assent before it becomes an act.

Update:  You can now download the Hansard record of the debate from this page.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    THIS IS A LINK TO THE REPORT, PUBLISHED TODAY, 29TH JULY, BY THE WORK AND PENSIONS COMMITTEE, REGARDING THE PATHWAYS TO WORK GREEN PAPER:

    The Report above was attached to the following email I received from the Work and Pensions committee on 28th July:

    From: Work And Pensions Committee <WORKPENCOM@parliament .uk>
    Sent: 28 July 2025
    Subject: EMBARGOED: Concerns new UC health claimants could face poverty

    House of Commons

    Work and Pensions Committee

    Concerns new UC health claimants could face poverty

    A new report from the Work and Pensions Committee has raised concerns that planned cuts to the health component of Universal Credit (UC health) will push disabled people into poverty despite the above inflation rise in the UC standard allowance.

    In its Pathways to Work report, the Committee repeated calls to delay planned cuts in UC health reform until the full impact of the changes are better understood. The Committee wrote to the Secretary of State in May calling for a pause of the planned reforms to UC health and Personal Independence Payments (PIP) and called for PIP policy to be co-produced with disabled people.

    The Government subsequently dropped all the PIP proposals and agreed to co-produce a new PIP assessment process with disabled people and their organisations in a review led by Sir Stephen Timms.

    However, under the planned reforms to UC health, from April 2026 although all existing claimants and new claimants with severe or terminal conditions will be protected, other claimants assessed as having limited capability for work and work-related activity will see their awards halved from £423.27 to £217.26.

    This is part of the Government’s drive to get more people off welfare and into work, as described in their Pathways to Work Green Paper.

    Although the intent to safeguard these people was welcomed, MPs on the Committee raised concerns that some conditions, particularly serious mental health conditions, might not be included under the severe condition criteria; this also applies to people with fluctuating conditions. The Committee also asked the Secretary of State why an assessment of safeguarding risks had not been conducted before the Green Paper was published.

    Committee Chair Debbie Abrahams said, “We welcome the concessions that the Government made to the UC and PIP Bill (now the UC Bill); but there are still issues with these welfare reforms not least with the cut in financial support that newly sick and disabled people will receive.”

    “The Government’s own analysis published in March indicates that from next April approximately 50,000 people who develop a health condition or become disabled – and those who live with them - will enter poverty by 2030 as a result of the reduction in support of the UC health premium.”

    “We recommend delaying the cuts to the UC-health premium, especially given that other policies that such as additional NHS capacity, or employment support, or changes in the labour market to support people to stay in work, have yet to materialise.”

    “We agree in a reformed and sustainable welfare system, but we must ensure that the wellbeing of those who come into contact with it is protected. The lesson learned from last month should be that the impact of policy changes to health-related benefits must be assessed prior to policy changes being implemented to avoid potential risks to claimants.”

    ENDS

    Notes to editors:

    The Universal Credit standard allowance is the minimum level of support received by people out of work. For those in work, and below this level, the standard allowance will top-up income to reach it. The minimum monthly levels for singles are £316.98 for under 25s and £400.14 for over 25s, and for couples under 25 £497.55 and £628.10 for over 25s.
    Non-pensioner health-related benefits spending has jumped £20bn since the pandemic.
    UC health as an incapacity benefit paid to people with conditions that limit their ability to work. There are others, including Employment Support Allowance. In total 3.3 million people now receive an incapacity benefit.
    Current spending on incapacity benefits as a % of GDP is currently significantly lower than its 1990s peak (1.3%).
    When published, the full report will appear on the inquiry website on the following link: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmworpen/837/report.html
    Committee Membership: Debbie Abrahams MP (Oldham East and Saddleworth, Labour) is Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee, a full list of Members can be found here.

    You can follow the Committee on X (formerly Twitter) using @CommonsWorkPen , and visit the Committee’s website.

    You can also find the House of Commons Committees on Instagram at @UKCommonsCommittees 

    Visit parliamentlive.tv to watch committees and parliamentary debates online

    Publications, Reports, Library research and much more can be found at www.parliament.uk

    For information about how the House of Commons uses your personal data please see our privacy notices: www.parliament.uk/site-information/data-protection. Your data will be held until you let us know that you wish to unsubscribe.

    House of Commons | Palace of Westminster | London SW1A 0AA | + 44 (0)20 7219 8582 | Text relay: 18001 020 7219 8582

    Works and Pensions Committee ;Website| Follow the Committee on: X @commonsworkpen |parliament.uk

    The House of Commons welcomes feedback. If you have any compliments, complaints or comments about the service that you have received please send an email to feedback@parliament .uk


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    @lurgeeliz is a fantastic disability commentator/activist on twitter and has written this excellent blog on all the changes coming in from the uc bill now it’s passed (including a very helpful table) 

    Well worth a read

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @D @D Thanks for posting that really useful link.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Benefit claimants should be happy they beat the government.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @RookiesUncle I don't think the governments proposals and stances did anything good for disabled and sick individuals except to create stress and make their conditions worse then it already was. Nobody is happy about having an unkind and unjust government who protects the rich and criminalises the sick and disabled. It is not the type of society anyone wants or should have to endure
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 days ago
    The HSE have created an easy user guide for disabled people.
     “Health and safety for disabled people at work

    Includes principles to support disabled workers, support workers with long-term health conditions and employers’ duties.

    Principles to support disabled workers and workers with long-term health conditions in work
    Support workers with long-term health conditions and disabled workers
    Employers’ duties in protecting disabled people at work
    Your health and safety as a disabled worker
    Your health and safety as a disabled worker easy read guide
    Easy read guides to support you as a disabled worker in the workplace
    Resources and useful links”
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 days ago
    I wish they would go after the rich tax dodgers who are the real problem not us who just happen to be ill. They won’t rush a wealth tax though the Lords.

    We must all join together and give them another target which is legitimate not innocent people.  

    I hope you all find peace and can access the help you need.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    I currently receive UC/LCWRA, when do I need to start worrying about losing any part of what I currently receive?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    Listening to BBC Radio 4 podcast ‘Grave Robbers’ and I’m disgusted to hear that a will executor only has to say there is no inheritance tax due on a home, they don’t have to prove this or provide any evidence. How many millions have been lost to the public purse in this way, and yet the government pursues the withdrawal of financial support of disabled people with dogged determination? I despair of this world. Crooks and incompetents are running it. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Andy I can't speak for why others have downvoted you, but my disagreement with your comment isn't over the fact that the HMRC has rules, its over how it implements the rules and checks that they're not broken. And Sue Mitchell, highly respected journalist, reported on that podcast that when applying for probate, an executor has to say whether or not a property is subject to inheritance tax or not. If they say 'yes', HMRC will be notified. If they say 'no', they will not. So unless someone else reports a false declaration, or HMRC finds out by some other means, they may well get away with not paying any inheritance tax. This has happened in cases she reported in the podcast, and criminals have got away with it (and no doubt continue to do so). The probate system is not fit for purpose. However, when a disability benefit claimant applies for financial support, they are put through the wringer and treated with suspicion. Our bank accounts will be scrutinised. Genuine mistakes are treated as fraud until proven otherwise. I"m fed up of a political system that gives preferential treatment to the well off and treats the less well off like something you would find on the bottom of your shoe. I have nothing against people being well of per se, just a two tier system where our so called 'public servants' serve only the rich. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Andy I don't know why people down vote a true fact. Look it up for yourselves.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Andy The journalist said they just self declare that no inheritance tax is due. I know there are serious consequences if they get found out, it’s just that they can lie and hope they don’t. That’s certainly what happened in the incidences she was investigating and Hungarian criminals almost got away with it- until she reported it to HMRC. My point is that the state has loose procedures which allow money due from wealthier people to be lost, but sickness benefit claimants have to produce evidence for every pound
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Gingin This is nonsense, an executor has to report if an estate has to pay IHT. If they don't they will face serious penalties 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Gingin This is absolutely not true. An executor has a duty to inform HMRC of a death and any inheritance tax due. Failure to inform HMRC could result in severe consequences for the executor. Interest will be charged on top of any tax due.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    I suggest a rethink from the government and instead of "Pathways To Work" maybe "Road To Nowhere" is a far more suitable title.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Sam Ditto
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @CJA Thanks CJA, if it was not so tragic your comment would be funny.  Still it made me smile :-)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @CJA I was more thinking 'fastrack to suicide '
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    The government is now trialling Pathways to Work support and will have a national rollout in April 2026.

    All new claimants affected by the reduction to the UC health element will be offered support, provided by a dedicated Pathways to Work adviser. Additional work coach support to provide one-to-one personalised support to disabled customers and those with health conditions to help them move towards, and into, work. Pathways to Work Advisers will support claimants on Universal Credit (UC) who are awaiting their Work Capability Assessment and those who have been found to have ‘limited capability for work’ or ‘limited capability for work and work-related activity’ who want, or could benefit from, more help to move into work.

    A conversation about their needs, goals and aspirations; offered one-to-one follow-on support, and given help to access additional work, health and skills support that can meet their needs. This will include:

    Access to specialist local Supported Employment provision across England and Wales for individuals that are disabled, have health conditions or other complex barriers to employment through Connect to Work. Support through local Trailblazers and the WorkWell initiative, which will be available in around half of England and parts of Wales. In other areas, we will work to draw on health, skills and wider services and to put in place additional provision where this is needed.

    Connect to Work
    Offers tailored, one-to-one help from Employment Specialists and Employment Support Officers
    Connects employment with health and skills support
    Gains access to training, upskilling opportunities, and local services that boost your confidence and employability.
    Is shaped around your community’s needs.

    WorkWell
    It is anticipated (but not required) that WorkWell services will particularly work with individuals with mental health (MH) and musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, reflecting that these are two of the key drivers of ill-health-related economic inactivity, and a focus of the major conditions strategy. We expect work and health coaches will be able to provide:
    an initial assessment of barriers to employment
    return-to-work/thrive-in-work planning, with clear objectives that address physical, psychological and social needs
    employer liaison. If the participant consents, the employer can be contacted to share the work plan and provide advice
    advice on workplace adjustments
    personalised work and health support with follow-up as required, including ongoing support in the form of locally determined, low intensity appointments to take stock of progress and recommend further actions and activities
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @John So we're back to the various Government schemes of the 1980's which were never really successful, Youth Training Scheme, Youth Opportunities Program etc.  The issue that Governments (of all stripes) don't wish to acknowledge is that the era of full employment went forty years ago, and with the advent of intelligent AI it is only going to get worse. Even Yes, Prime Minister acknowledged that the only reason the school leaving age (at the time) was raised to 16 was to massage the unemployment figures. And now approx 50% go to Uni to be indebted for life!  If the able bodied are going to find increasingly difficult to get 'good' employment, what hope is there for those with serious, long-term disabilities.  Everything is simply Treasury led.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Dpb999 @Dpb999 You mean in the dark heart of Liz Kendall? 😉
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John What employers wouldn't employ a disabled person especially if they get them free (voluntary) if they were paying wages then they won't mind fluctuating illnesses but if the worker comes free and the government give less money then it's a win win for them the only 1 losing out is the disabled person who doesn't have a cat in hells chance at proper employment. it will be the same as tax credits government subsidies companies who won't pay  a livable wage....... what better than totally free.And voluntary giving the unemployable better self-esteem then companies wont.complain about income tax rises ha-ho sorted
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Boo So pathways to work can be a pathway to schemes that are a pathway to more schemes. Many of which have the option of unpaid work placements.

      It strikes me unpaid work placements reduce paid employment rather than increase it. Why pay when you can get free workers. And undermine self esteem rather than build it. You are not worth paying, or you are being given false hope of getting a paid job at the end only to be left feeling exploited then discarded.

      The DWP say unpaid work placements are a success story of increased employer engagement with the DWP. But, don't get why, or don't care. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John All due respect, they can stick that pathway right where the sun don't shine.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    On a related topic, which I fear will impact many disabled people, the Samaritans are planning to close around half of their 200 offices, and move much more to a phone based function which I don't think offers anything like the same support as a face to face consultation. Like RNIB and other charities, they are struggling with declining income.  (Article, BBC news).
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Jeremy Corbyn coming back! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Andy As I already said at least my conscience will be clear!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @lesley
      Well I will vote for him.  So that's one vote!! 
      At least my conscience will be clear!
      I have actually met him.  On Salisbury Plain.  There was a little village called Imber.
      Look up the story about it.
      A friend of mine campaigned to keep a day of rememberance for the village and the people who were evicted.
      Sadly my friend has now died.
      Who should turn up on his bicycle, Jeremy Corbyn.  He has cycled from the nearest railway station to give my friend some support.
      A truly lovely man!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @lesley Despite his good intentions, he never has and never will be voted into power.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @lesley I fear that this will help to split the voters on the left and ultimately let Farage through to be PM.  No matter what happens politically at the moment, we appear to be screwed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @lesley Bad news then 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    The courts are going to be clogged up with benefits appeal cases. Which just costs more money &  unnecessary stress to claimant's. Unfortunately I fear that lives will be lost. If the claimant gets the dwp decision overturned, just costs more money. What a ridiculous waste of time and money. To think Keir harmer was a human rights lawyer 🤔. The man is dangerous and needs to be gone. He is destroying this country. I think he is the worst unstable and dangerous prime minister we've ever had.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Cuckoo21 As well as the countless eviction cases that will be going to court now that landlords will have to issue a Section 8 notice rather than the 'no fault' section 21.  Plus all the criminal cases that need  to be heard.....basically, I can see the scenario whereby you will wait literally years before your case for reviewing PIP/UC/LCWRA etc will come before a tribunal and in the meantime you will receive either no money at all, or greatly reduced benefits. And if in that process you lose your home - the disabled predominantly have to rent - then the Council is going to face the issue to trying to house you.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/starmer-labour-rebel-mps-welfare-b2795015.html

    Labour MPs should not be okay that their party leader is running the Labour Party like a dictatorship 

    MPs true bosses are the constituents that vote them in…….sadly they only seem to remember that a year before the next general election 

    Hope this annoys the flip flop rebels that their leader has so little respect for them


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @D
      His authority has taken a hammering and this isn't likely to change that. If anything it will just annoy his MPs even further. 

      If Labour gets clobbered at the English local elections and the Scottish and Welsh elections in May of next year then Starmer's authority really will be completely shot and a leadership challenge will then become a genuine possibility.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    At least we can console ourselves with the thought that if we lived beyond 2060 we will not be able to claim a state pension until either 74 (OBR) projections, or 80 (according to a consultancy organisation).  What we are beginning to witness is the privatisation of the welfare state.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Matt Thanks that has cheered me up no end. Lucky for me I won't see anywhere near 2060. 😔🤣. Gotta laugh.  Understand people are stressed and shattered by all of of this, but ...... Hey ho. Try not to think that far ahead, not everyone has that. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Matt Thanks that has cheered me up a lot. I😔🤣. definitely won't get anywhere near 2060.  But thanks for the info.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    The government that claims increasing disabled people's contact with the DWP will not increase stress or distress. As if there is no fear of brown envelopes from the DWP. Has sent the Labour MPs who rebelled on the Universal Credit bill, brown envelopes from the Labour party Whips office. To make them fear they are going to be suspended. Only to find out it is just a reminder that voting against the Labour government is against the rules of the Labour party.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @John Warped.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @John Ha. Fear of them gave me an eating disorder 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    @Chaz, re your comment below about lib dems being two faced:

    Are you saying this because lib dems voted for the amendment? Voting for the amendment was voting against the government. Voting against the amendment was voting with the government.

    The lib dems voted for the amendment, against the government, which is consistent with lib dems being pro disabled support, so not two faced in that respect.

    This seems to have caused some confusion, with people thinking that voting for the amendment was voting for the bill. The amendment of regret was highlighting the faults of the universal credit bill, ie saying to the government 'we see you', even though it couldn't prevent the bill from passing.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    This vote is yet another argument as to why the unelected House of Lords should be abolished and replaced with an elected second chamber. 
    Labour is finished after these cuts and its continuing austerity economics which are causing tens of thousands of job losses across the NHS. 
    In my region the ICB has had to close down the regional suicide prevention service due to the cuts ordered by Labour to the budget of the ICB. Across the country ICB's which commission local health services are suffering mass redundancies and this affecting front line services. Plus we have the ongoing privatisation of the NHS which is causing terrible damage to services.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @SLB @SLB And this time they didn't have an opportunity to properly vote against the bill so an amendment was their best way of showing dissent. It's a shame not more voted for the amendment as it's difficult to see how anyone could disagree with anything in it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @bronc I'm sorry, but this is not simply the case.  Just because we did not get the symbollic win we were looking for is no reason to abolish it.  Indeed, on 300 divisions in the last three years of Tory rule, the Lords voted against the government - and over 70 times during the current Labour government (and that includes voting for a motion against the winter fuel payments being cut).  

      https://www.parliament.uk/about/faqs/house-of-lords-faqs/lords-govtdefeats/

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact