There are widespread, but as yet unofficial, reports of “massive concessions” by the government in relation to planned benefit cuts, which will see current claimants protected and the backbench rebellion end.

According to reports in the Guardian and the BBC, cuts to PIP and the LCWRA element of universal credit (UC) will not apply to current claimants. 

In addition, a package of employment support measures worth £1bn will begin this year with more to come, rather than being introduced in 2029.

There will also be consultation with disability groups on other planned changes to benefits.

Future claimants, however, will be subject to the PIP four-point rule and to the reduction in the LCWRA element of UC.

It is claimed that the heads of government committees, who were leading the rebellion, have all accepted the government’s offer.  Though one campaigner, MP Peter Lamb, has said he will still not support the bill because the government is ignoring better options.

No official details of any concessions have yet been released and given the governments rushed timescale for getting the legislation through parliament, there will be little opportunity for MPs to scrutinise and debate the details.

Updatethe BBC are reporting that the protection of current claimants is now official, stating "Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told Labour MPs that claimants of the personal independence payment (Pip) will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health element of universal credit. Instead, planned cuts will only hit future claimants."

They also quote the leader of the rebellion, MP Dame Meg Hillier as saying she would now support the government's welfare bill.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 57 minutes ago
    Remember of course this is for as long as Labour are in power. After a general election if the Tories or Reform get it in particular Reform the cuts will be much worse. So it may change again. However with the state of the world and the control and money being in the hands of a smaller group of billionaires and now emerging trillionaires there may not be any money left for anything. Governments and politicians around the world need to be looking at this because this is one of the biggest issues every country has. They own everything the government borrows from them and we get less and less more and more goes back to the rich. Have a look at Gary Stevenson on U-tube he explains why things are happening to us all. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    I much enjoyed my MPs announcement on twitter she still intends to vote against these cuts. Going to contact the others nearby and ask for their support. A single extra vote might swing this so keep up the pressure everyone. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    And few years later leveling DOWN like with the ESA/UC temporary protection!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    The Severe Dissability prremums cut was going to apply only to new claimants.  But now, everyone moved to UC will lose it over time!!!   Lies and smokescreen!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Sounds like there is still considerable pushback by some of the 'rebels'  to still reject these 'concessions'. The Lib Dems have also said they are still going to vote against and the majority of the disability organisations are also opposed.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2025/jun/27/welfare-bill-cuts-labour-conservatives-keir-starmer-uk-politics-latest-news-updates
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    What will happen to existing claiments on new style esa & in the support group? The green paper stated this would change to unemployment insurance & would be time limited. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    From what I understand, existing claimants will stay on the current system forever, and never be subject to the new rules, even on review.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 58 minutes ago
      @Palemazy I agree Palemazy, successive governments change policy so nothing is guaranteed, this might be only a short reprieve. Also it really is unfair to have a two tier system, why should someone get penalised for becoming ill or disabled at a later date. Also what about the young people when can they claim or is that staying the same?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Anon
      Forever is a long time, they have already changed "forever" many times in the past 16 years!

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Anon So will all existing g claimants, on PIP & UC health benefits not have to have a review in future?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    dont believe a word of it, remeber how they fooled us for our votes.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    So at any point, the DWP can end your claim forcing you to re-apply subjecting you to the new rules. What a crafty concession.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @John For existing claimants reassessments would not result in the 4pt rule being applied.

      If someone with a fluctuating health condition had their health improve and lost eligibility for PIP then at a latter date their health deteriorated and they reclaimed PIP. Then I expect they would be treated as a new claim.

      Note when hospitalized or in a care home for over 28 days while PIP payments can stop the underlying claim remains active, and payment will restart once no longer in the hospital or care home. So they would remain exempt from the 4pt rule.   
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Until concessions are part of the bill nobody should be voting for its like you are signing a blank cheque. This bill must be scrapped and they should go back to the drawing board and begin again by consulting properly with the disabled community and doing a proper impact statement and above all not be in such a rush to ram things through undemocratically
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Note to B&W - possible loophole for government to cut existing claimants. 

    I was reading the concessions & it says that it will only cut UC health element for new claimants, but it doesn't say anything about existing ESA support group claimants waiting to be migrated. I am very worried that we may be classed as new claimants and have our LCWRA element halved as a result. Please can someone clarify this? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Aw I'd assume that if you already claim PIP this won't affect you, but I've no idea what the stance is regarding those on ESA Support waiting to migrate to UC who don't currently claim PIP
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    I'm sorry but this might look like a win for current claimants like myself but how can they advocate this for future claimants, it's a disgrace, so wrong!

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Does that also mean any new claims that are made now before  2026?,  I have to migrate to  UC before Aug 6th from ESA support group , but have been too scared to claim PIP so far due to all the stress of appealing  etc.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    As some others have already asked, what about those of us still on DLA and of working age?
    Will we be assessed under the new system or should we apply for PIP ahead of November 2026?
    I really don't know what to do here. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Susie27 This question needs answering & highlighted to all those mps 😕
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Still extremely concerned 
    If these concessions regarding New PIP Points
    Criteria apply to new claimants then will these also apply to those up for PIP review which is effectively classed as a new claim?

    incidentally should new claimants applying for PIP with similar disabilities as those already awarded PIP be declined ?
    Isn't this morally wrong ?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 54 minutes ago
      @Harry I agree Harry though it's only morally wrong if you have got morals which this government has proven are in short supply.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Harry Existing claimants covers anyone currently receiving PIP. Reassessments and Reviews for them will not apply the 4pt PIP rule. Only new claims.

      If someone's health fluctuates to the point they lose PIP and then have to reclaim PIP at a latter date when their health deuterates again. I expect they would be treated as a new claim. Unless PIP awards have some sort of bridging between claims.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    When does a current claimant become a new claim? Claimant v claim. I'm not a new claimant if I stop claiming then start claiming in the future ?
    Why would people who start claiming because they become ill next year be less entitled than me. Two tier Kier! 
    There is nothing in this whole process that is done with compassion or thought for people with disabilities. It's just about saving money. 
    If this doesn't open your eyes on what people in power are like nothing will. How sad. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    I'm concerned that as a pensioner on PIP with review due 2027 that I'll be affected by the new rules ..no doubt more waffle from Timms on it..
    It is good news for existing claimants but I'm concerned too about all those disabled people who will come after this..so ill thought out,and too rushed which is what they want.
    Ditch it. Start from scratch WITH the disabled.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    I wonder what the cut off is for 'existing claimants'

    Is it:
    A: Currently receiving benefit payments
    B: Claim was started prior to the law being passed
    C: Last decision was made prior to law being passed 

    I ask as there will be a lot of people currently working their way through MRs & Appeals and it would be terrible unfair for a tribunal to change a 0 points decision to 12 (made up of six 2 points descriptors) yet have to give a no entitlement
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Carlos Marking For mandatory reconsiderations and appeals it will be the date the original award decision the claimant is asking to be reconsidered or is appealing was was made. As reconsideration and appeal decisions are based on the law at the time of the original award decision being disputed, and if successful backdated to the date of the original award decision. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Carlos Marking Yes, I've wondered this myself. I assume (but I could be wrong) that it would be from the original decision day, since that is when money is back dated to, should you win an MR or a tribunal. Same for a review. You get any changed award from the date they make the decision, not when the review was due, or when paperwork was submitted.

      Of course, I could be wrong, and this is something needing to be confirmed. However, if this is when they pay you from, it would be complicated to work it out differently. But it does mean more will lose out since they are so behind on reviews. Which, of course, works in their favour! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Concessions? Capitulation? Climb-down? What utter rubbish! The bill should be defeated whole scale and completely. It will still penalise the future disabled and sick. KILL THE BILL! Immediately email your MP! The totally vague proposed changes mean nothing!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Hedgehog Strongly agree. There'll be little (if any) "I'm alright Jack!" sentiments here. If what's still unofficial is later confirmed, then it's a gross injustice to myriads of future claimants who'll suffer ill-health or disability. Why should they receive far less help when we waste billions on overseas wars we don't need to be involved in
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    So unless there is going to be a different set of descriptor points for current claimants at review,nothing has really changed.The 4 points rule will apply when reassessed after November 26.This will then be written into law and used for everyone.Rushing this through and the rebels accepting this ,there needs to be a pause to ask the questions thrown up now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @larry b That’s correct.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @larry b now they saing this, but wait couple of years and new rules will apply, like with the ESA/UC migration.  The protection is temorary!  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Claire i think they are saying if you are on pip now ,you keep it permanently at that level,unless you have a change ,you will not be judged on any of the new criteria same with lcw and lcwra.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.