There are widespread, but as yet unofficial, reports of “massive concessions” by the government in relation to planned benefit cuts, which will see current claimants protected and the backbench rebellion end.

According to reports in the Guardian and the BBC, cuts to PIP and the LCWRA element of universal credit (UC) will not apply to current claimants. 

In addition, a package of employment support measures worth £1bn will begin this year with more to come, rather than being introduced in 2029.

There will also be consultation with disability groups on other planned changes to benefits.

Future claimants, however, will be subject to the PIP four-point rule and to the reduction in the LCWRA element of UC.

It is claimed that the heads of government committees, who were leading the rebellion, have all accepted the government’s offer.  Though one campaigner, MP Peter Lamb, has said he will still not support the bill because the government is ignoring better options.

No official details of any concessions have yet been released and given the governments rushed timescale for getting the legislation through parliament, there will be little opportunity for MPs to scrutinise and debate the details.

Updatethe BBC are reporting that the protection of current claimants is now official, stating "Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told Labour MPs that claimants of the personal independence payment (Pip) will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health element of universal credit. Instead, planned cuts will only hit future claimants."

They also quote the leader of the rebellion, MP Dame Meg Hillier as saying she would now support the government's welfare bill.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    What about pensioners who have ongoing 10 year awards.

    How will their ongoing awards be affected at the present, and also when it comes round for renewal.

    Will the new 4 point be exempt in the case of pensioners with an ongoing award.

    Also what happens to an ongoing award where by a pensioners health is in decline, and they need more help, care, support to lead independent lives.  Would they then be subject to this 4point rule, due to a change in circumstances.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I feel like the government are making cuts at the wrong end of the problem. PIP claimants get awarded because they have a disability that affects their daily lives and many of them use the money to help them to continue to work, and they have to jump through hoops to even get the award. The cuts probably should be made to certain parts of universal credit, anyone on universal credit who gets LCW allowance also gets the standard allowance as would someone actively looking for work, it’s seems a bit like getting paid twice. The same for a disabled child UC paid for a child allowance plus a disabled child allowance which is given because the child receives DLA which is already an allowance due to a disability. Nobody likes the idea of money being cut from what we’re used to getting but I personally feel like my child who receives DLA which in turn on my UC claim qualifies for severely disabled child allowance of over £400 shouldn’t receive the standard child allowance of over £300 as well. Surely the disability element should supersede the standard allowance not be added to it. I wouldn’t expect education to provide a SEN school place and a mainstream school place for the same child surely it’s one or the other not both. At the same time as £300 per year not a month like UC payments but per year was cut in heating allowance for many pensioners because the benefits system couldn’t afford it, none of it makes anysense. I for one would not see a massive argument if I was told I could only receive the standard rate or the disability rate which is higher but not receive both on top of the separate pip or dla award. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @J Wilson LCW claimants don’t get any more than UC regular claimants and that amount is not designed to be sustainable long term. 

      LCWRA claimants get a top up because they are classed as having a condition that severely impacts their ability to work and is expected to last some time, and many are just as PIP claimants but can’t get it either due to the stress involved or

      We need both as some get PIP for aids snd assistance and can still work and thus top up their income working to pay for living expenses. The funds are designed to pay for different things,  which is why having one assessment makes no sense in the current system.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @J Wilson A child awarded SENDs, every school receive a standard premium per pupil, the additional premium awarded to children who have a recognised health/disability is for the additional support & costs associated according to the need of the child it for the additional support. So the school receives both. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I advise anyone worried about any contact review on the phone in person for whatever reason you request like I did that it is recorded. Then they can’t lie or do anything they shouldn’t. Everything should be recorded always. Then you have proof. The same with your forms you should be able to dispute where they have awarded you less than they should. But always witnesses and always a recording. They stitched me up when I worked for a government department and I know you need to keep everything. Don’t let them browbeat you. Get support . They are evil unfortunately. You might get upset and feel awful I did I still am afraid of it but you deserve the help and you are entitled to be treated properly and get the help you need. Good luck to everyone . 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I'm confused! Please forgive me but can someone help me out understand 
    I get pip and LCWRA they used the word on the news "indefinite " what does this mean please 
    No harsh comments please 


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Dog lover I also get pip and LWCRA and indefinite means an ongoing award without an end date. I am so pleased about the new decisions we can rest are minds a little easier now. I still feel bad for future claimant's with same conditions as myself. But very good news over all.
      Kind regards Justin.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Even though people who are currently receiving PIP...are 'stated' as being 'safe'...with regards to any future reassessments..(in that the 4 point rule on 1 question will never apply)...stating this rule will only apply to new claimants. This will just lead assessors to be more brutal when re-assessing current PIP claimants...and scoring them lower overall than they originally would have done...just to get them off the benefit altogether. Then...when the person re-applies..they will be classed as a new claimant...whereby the 4 point rule will then apply...making it virtually impossible to claim. The government will make sure when current PIP re-assessments take place of people already receiving PIP...that they will be trying to get as many people off off the benefit as they can...so even if the 4 point rule doesnt apply....you will see more and more people at re-assessments being told they just haven't scored enough points...(they will be able to get around it that way...4 point rule or no 4 point rule....) either way...they can fudge the figures to get what they want in the end...by any New claimants not meeting the 4 point rule.....so they're not eligible to claim...and all people currently in receipt of PIP...being told at re-assessment..that they just 'haven't scored the number of points required', which gets them off the benefit aswell. This is why ALL the reforms need to be scrapped...and started from scratch....This affects peoples LIVES...and should therefore go through ALL necessary consultations and make sure there are no loopholes in which the government can stealthily penalise anyone who needs this benefit in order to live a semi independent life at best. Cutting disability benefits is NOT the way to go....maybe MP's should look closer to home... at how much money is wasted in Government...on 2nd homes.....expenses being claimed unjustly....just saying!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Susan O'Mahoney These questions most definitely need answering, and the organisation I work for will be pushing for clarification so we can support clients appropriately.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Fiona Smith I foresee as a benefits specialist preparing clients for and attending even more tribunals. As I already see the effect this often stressful process has on my clients I can only foresee this worsening, although I also from experience expect feedback from the tribunals service to the DWP in the future when the appeals system becomes even more ridiculously backlogged, about cases where a better decision could have been made at either claim stage or Mandatory Reconsideration stage...DWP rarely even attend. Yet again I had a hearing yesterday where they did not attend. Regardless, I will continue to encourage clients with a valid case to go on fighting and support them, though in many cases it should not be coming to this. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Fiona Smith Existing claimants are Future claimants. The great Labour con.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Fiona Smith Brilliant, brilliant comment. This.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Fiona Smith I'm thinking that if we fail our review (when it's time to reassess us) the rules will stay for MR & tribunal? However, if they deny us a new award (despite us being able to appeal) I wonder if we will instantly lose our UC lcwra element. These questions need categoric answers and needs to be crystal clear 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    If our current PIP claim ends and a new award is denied following a new assessment (which they usually try & do) are we still protected throughout MR & tribunal? Will we use our UC health element as soon as we 'fail' our assessment?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Remember of course this is for as long as Labour are in power. After a general election if the Tories or Reform get it in particular Reform the cuts will be much worse. So it may change again. However with the state of the world and the control and money being in the hands of a smaller group of billionaires and now emerging trillionaires there may not be any money left for anything. Governments and politicians around the world need to be looking at this because this is one of the biggest issues every country has. They own everything the government borrows from them and we get less and less more and more goes back to the rich. Have a look at Gary Stevenson on U-tube he explains why things are happening to us all. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Helen Galloway Yeah Gary speaks the truth, inequality is the root cause of 90% of our problems.  And it's only getting worse. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I much enjoyed my MPs announcement on twitter she still intends to vote against these cuts. Going to contact the others nearby and ask for their support. A single extra vote might swing this so keep up the pressure everyone. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    And few years later leveling DOWN like with the ESA/UC temporary protection!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The Severe Dissability prremums cut was going to apply only to new claimants.  But now, everyone moved to UC will lose it over time!!!   Lies and smokescreen!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Sounds like there is still considerable pushback by some of the 'rebels'  to still reject these 'concessions'. The Lib Dems have also said they are still going to vote against and the majority of the disability organisations are also opposed.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2025/jun/27/welfare-bill-cuts-labour-conservatives-keir-starmer-uk-politics-latest-news-updates
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    What will happen to existing claiments on new style esa & in the support group? The green paper stated this would change to unemployment insurance & would be time limited. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon I am in this same position. Would like some clarity from someone as it’s worrying.  We all want a better life with opportunities but life’s not always that simple with a disability that changes day to day.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon Good question! I am in that situation and mystified. I'm concerned that we will end up as a New Claim when they bring in the Insurance Based version and then either be told to look for work or placed on that lower band who only get half the current amount of ESA. 
      Their reasoning that it was "unfair" that our contribution was paid rather falls flat when you realise that a previous government chose to pay our stamp precisely because of our severe disabilities from birth making work unlikely once they scrapped Remploy! At least that was what happened to me. 
      Ironically Contribution based Severe Disablement Allowance was was a form of compensation that saved them paying out huge sums to the victims of gross medical negligence like me! I earned it when a Letby style nurse decided I didn't need the oxygen...!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @KT I would also like to know what will happen to those of us currently receiving contributions based/new style esa and in the support group. Will we have to change to unemployment insurance (with an as yet unknown time limit) and pass the pip assessment, or will be be allowed to remain on our current benefit?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    From what I understand, existing claimants will stay on the current system forever, and never be subject to the new rules, even on review.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon Problem I find some people doing the assessment are not the sand we others.  The staff are not consistent and basically treat us like numbers. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @MrFibro Ironically we used to be told we had DLA 'for life' then it was downgraded to 'indefinitely'. Weasel words...
      Well the damage is done. 
      Back when it was seen as the decent thing to do for kids the NHS had crippled for life, my parents quite like the extra income. Once IDS and the gutter press started I became an embarrassment because what would people think of them having one of _ those_ people in their family. At which point they started looking at care homes for me...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Simon I get UCHB for CPTSD. I wonder what they’d class that as, as it’s actually trauma related brain damage, really. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon That is a good question.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Palemazy Forever, is just a sweetener, to butter up the rebels.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    dont believe a word of it, remeber how they fooled us for our votes.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    So at any point, the DWP can end your claim forcing you to re-apply subjecting you to the new rules. What a crafty concession.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @john People with fluctuations conditions will then have to fear slight improvements which often don't last that long but long enough for PIP to be taken away. As well as everyone living in even bigger fear of reassessments than they already do. I wish they'd just be honest and say they want to cull us. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John Yes that's what I was thinking John Very crafty how this has been done 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John For existing claimants reassessments would not result in the 4pt rule being applied.

      If someone with a fluctuating health condition had their health improve and lost eligibility for PIP then at a latter date their health deteriorated and they reclaimed PIP. Then I expect they would be treated as a new claim.

      Note when hospitalized or in a care home for over 28 days while PIP payments can stop the underlying claim remains active, and payment will restart once no longer in the hospital or care home. So they would remain exempt from the 4pt rule.   
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Until concessions are part of the bill nobody should be voting for its like you are signing a blank cheque. This bill must be scrapped and they should go back to the drawing board and begin again by consulting properly with the disabled community and doing a proper impact statement and above all not be in such a rush to ram things through undemocratically
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Note to B&W - possible loophole for government to cut existing claimants. 

    I was reading the concessions & it says that it will only cut UC health element for new claimants, but it doesn't say anything about existing ESA support group claimants waiting to be migrated. I am very worried that we may be classed as new claimants and have our LCWRA element halved as a result. Please can someone clarify this? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Aw I think you will be safe due to the DWP moving at a snails pace! Everybody is to be moved over by March (?) next year and they won't have anything else figured out by then. It is a continuous claim, they are changing the schemes, not you.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Aw I'd assume that if you already claim PIP this won't affect you, but I've no idea what the stance is regarding those on ESA Support waiting to migrate to UC who don't currently claim PIP
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I'm sorry but this might look like a win for current claimants like myself but how can they advocate this for future claimants, it's a disgrace, so wrong!

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Does that also mean any new claims that are made now before  2026?,  I have to migrate to  UC before Aug 6th from ESA support group , but have been too scared to claim PIP so far due to all the stress of appealing  etc.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    As some others have already asked, what about those of us still on DLA and of working age?
    Will we be assessed under the new system or should we apply for PIP ahead of November 2026?
    I really don't know what to do here. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Susie27 I'm worried about this also.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Susie27 This question needs answering & highlighted to all those mps 😕

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact