The National Association of Welfare Rights Advisers (NAWRA) has written to the Work and Pensions Select Committee expressing its concern that vulnerable claimants are not safe in the hands of the DWP, as they are forced to attempt to migrate from employment and support allowance (ESA) to universal credit (UC).  In their letter, NAWRA publish many case studies of claimants facing homelessness as a result of DWP failures.

A 62 year old claimant who had a brain injury and a stroke has two carers visiting four times a day and needs an interpreter.  He was unable to manage the UC claim process and was offered no reasonable adjustments.  His legacy benefits were stopped in July 2025 and he has now built up large rent arrears.

A claimant who lives with schizophrenia had his claim stopped for failing to attend a Jobcentre Plus interview to verify his ID, in spite of his sister helping him make the initial phone call to claim UC and explaining why he couldn’t do it himself. The claimant receives PIP for severe mental illness but with no other income is now facing eviction.

Another claimant with a history of being sectioned due to severe mental illness has a care package in place.  She made two attempts to claim UC, but both were closed because she failed to verify her ID. Legal proceedings have now begun to evict her.

In none of the examples given by NAWRA did the DWP warn the local authority that a vulnerable claimant had had their legacy benefits stopped.

Yet on the same day that the NAWRA letter was published, the DWP sent out a press release headlined “Successful DWP campaign leads to closure of historical benefits”.

 This trumpeted that “Two benefits designed decades ago will officially close today following the successful delivery of the Move to Universal Credit campaign by the Department for Work and Pensions.”

The DWP say that as part of their commitment to safeguarding vulnerable customers, they have extended the deadline for claiming UC for ESA and housing benefit claimants.

However, it is up to vulnerable claimants to request an extension of their deadline date, before the original deadline expires, something which many may be unable to do.

NAWRA is calling for automatic migration for the relatively small number of ESA claimants who have yet to make the move, improved safeguarding and for the DWP to have the courage to publish figures about how many cases have been terminated, especially where no benefit is in payment as a result.

You can read the NAWRA letter here

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    A homeless terminally ill profoundly disabled man had his esa stopped on 31 march 26, complaints in for years about no RA for him and no supported migration, he can’t communicate unaided , I spoke to Dwp today promised to call back they never did, he is documented high risks ,no safeguards nothing implemented by Dwp ! They do not care , we will help him file emergency JR now.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    It depends what type of esa you were receiving before contribution based or income based. That is why you are receiving new style esa I expect as well as a UC payment. It has happened to my son who I am appointee for. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    it is well documented that internal errors cost the DWP over 8 billion a year - I was a labour voter all my life but now NEVER AGAIN - I wrote to my local MP Chris Ward to express my anger and disgust at labour demonising and punishing the disabled community only to discover that he had voted in favour of all the cuts and punishments this government are forcing on the disabled community. In his response to my factually verified email outlining the financial wastage made by those who run the system and the financial wastage of government such as asking him to justify why a Lord is paid £323 per day just for turning up but they think giving a disabled person £20 per day is unsustainable - the response I got was to tell me that disabled people, and I quote "have no dignity, if they are not working" and all the while missing the irony that they are cutting the funding to the access to work scheme. I am sick and tired of listening to these rich, white overprivileged men moaning on how people are choosing this as a lifestyle! like anyone would want to have to deal with a system that treats people who need help like scum and makes the whole process so damaging - it makes my blood boil. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    There will be a special place in hell for Iain Duncan Smith,  the architect of Universal credit,  he's concocted a horrible , strict,  punitive system that have lead people to their deaths 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Cookie It's a system fundamentally designed on the assumption that the claimants are fully capable (and even then a lot of the forms are actively deceptive)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Duncan I've never had any real problem with the DWP,perhaps some people are luckier.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Duncan When I had problems with DWP a few years ago, I use to write to IDS as he is my local MP.  But I had not realised he was  the mastermind behind hurting people.  So I wasted my time.  He would correspond with the highest level of government, but this is when I discovered that these high level officers were actually responsible for the pain and misery of thousands of people.  It was absolute hell and continues to be to this day.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Ruth
    I am a claimant with serious mental impairement. I was forced to move to uc last week after extending deadline from original 30th august.
    I self harmed after the phone call as I got a text telling myself to call them immediately or lose money. it was 5.45pm!
    lucky I got through after Id cut my own arm and face up and punchd my head.
    to be told text was sent in error.
    Im terrified of this UC and am dreading being hounded by them.
    I wont cope at all.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    No judge in the land is going to evict a mentally impaired claimant. I have seen similar cases with landlords looking to remove disabled claimants, but at courts, they are told there is no chance because of welfare rights, so they either end up with social workers or council or housing associations having to help resolve it. Conservatives sold all NHS care homes and specialist hospitals' care in the community or burden.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    all those cases quoted clearly need either a Power of Attorney or DWP Appointee....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @HBS Not everyone that needs one has a POA or appointee
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Transitioned
    Housing association  issued, "notice of seeking possession"
     Threatening letters, as FIRST resort!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    The "independent" review into mental health conditions and ADHD and Autism interim report is out.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-into-mental-health-conditions-adhd-and-autism-interim-report

    Some snippets from the interim report. Note my choice of snippets might not give a very fair impression of the report. It is over 80 pages long.

    "current patterns are shaped as much by the design of systems as by underlying need, including the incentives those systems create and the increasing tendency to medicalise forms of distress that may have broader social or developmental roots."

    "What is clear is that services are under significant and sustained pressure, and that the status quo is unlikely to be sustainable or fair in its present form."

    "A central question for the Review is whether rising presentations to services reflect a real increase in psychological distress within the population, or whether they arise primarily from changes in awareness, recognition, diagnosis and service use."

    "Historical analyses show that behaviours in children once regarded as" within the range of normal variation, or even as something to be welcomed in some contexts, are now more often interpreted as requiring intervention or treatment."

    " There is also concern that certain platforms, including TikTok, convey a high proportion of factually inaccurate messages around for example ADHD"

    "There is also a need to consider the medicalisation of distress within current systems of response. While clinical frameworks are essential for identifying and treating many conditions, there is a risk that a wide range of difficulties - particularly those arising from social, educational or environmental pressures - may increasingly be interpreted primarily through a medical lens.This can lead to pathways in which diagnosis becomes the main route to support, even where alternative responses may be more appropriate. It can also lead to inappropriate treatment – loneliness for example is unlikely to respond to antidepressants. A more effective approach may therefore require ensuring that people are directed to the form of support that best matches their needs, which in some cases will be clinical, but in others may be educational, social or community-based."

    "In many cases, earlier practical, educational or community-based support may offer more effective and less disruptive responses than prolonged waits for specialist assessment alone. The aim is therefore not to narrow access, but to broaden the ways in which help can be offered, so that individuals and families are able to receive support earlier and in forms that are better matched to their circumstances. In practice this may mean expanding earlier forms of support whileensuring that specialist services remain available for those whose needs require them."

    "The aim is not only to improve outcomes for individuals and families but also to ensure that public resources are used more effectively"
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @John That sounds - very ignorant!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    it was a absouloute nightmare moving to universal credits from ESA support gtoup to universal credits DWP offered no help  local councillor arranged for me to get help from job centre told didnt need anything incorrect did the majority myself help for vulnerable is non existent cant use telephone
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Gail My change over was a nightmare 3 years ago, only my experience of working for the DWP helped me navigate the process, left entirely alone to get on with it. Was offered support from the CAB but no one phoned back. I now fear for the sick and disabled as I read so much spite on social media towards one section of society, plus the elderly. Wonder if the gov nudge units are preparing the public for elderly and disabled folks living in tents on the streets. 
      Once I'm able I may start a support group for those on the margins & suffering cuts to income plus social distain. Of course this site is invaluable in providing insight into gov policy. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago

    My whole post:

    Can what the dwp says be true -

    "that as part of their commitment to safeguarding vulnerable customers, they have extended the deadline for claiming UC for ESA and housing benefit claimants"

    at the same time as this

    “Two benefits designed decades ago will officially close today following the successful delivery of the Move to Universal Credit campaign by the Department for Work and Pensions.”?

    Of course it can, because

    "War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength"
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @s Well done S for speaking truth about a system that is rotten to its core, and have caused the deaths and homelessness of thousands of people.  It never changes - only gets worse.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @s I have had mostly reasonable experiences with the DWP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @rtbcpart2 I weep at your truth , according to dwp past and present ... only their lies ( which have been many ), * no honour In their bullying deceit .. take note timms ... mcfadden ... and all other unkind untruthful .. sorry excuses for so called leaders of the cowardly department of the dwp , how low must you stoop dwp ,   with your lies .. 
      p.s. to all here .. suffering at the hands of dwp ... Inhumanity & lies ..
      to all here.. I am proud to be part of this long long number of people who are ALWAYS ... always in my thoughts 
      .. and that is the humanity I will never turn my back on !!!! Not Ever x
      from...  s 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    It not just about the migration with rents rising and housing allowance not increasing you only have to be sanctioned once and only for a month or two then will be in rent arrears already I could go on about universal credit cruelty but I think everybody knows what it’s like by now 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Chucky Migration put me in arrears.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    he DWP say be true -

    at the same time as this

    "Two benefits designed decades ago will officially close today"?

    Of course it can, because

    "War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength"



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @rtbcpart2 Last week I checked the bank statements of a woman who now gets UC but is worried because her ESA has continued in spite of the migration letter telling her it would end. The two together add up to what the Turn2Us calculator says she should receive.   Are many people still receiving this "closed" benefit?

We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.