There are probably only two weeks to go until the first vote on Labour’s cuts takes place in the Commons.  Labour backbenchers suspected of planning to rebel will be bombarded with threats, bribes and misleading propaganda about the reform plans.

But there are still steps you can take to counter the pressure they are experiencing and also to encourage MPs of all parties to vote against the cuts.

Contact local councillors

This really is worth doing.  Cuts will have a very damaging effect on local authority budgets as care services, housing, health services, advice services and education will all be hit and everyone will be worse off as a result. So, it’s an issue councillors really should be raising with their MPs.

Tower Hamlets local authority has called on the government to reverse the cuts, which they estimate will cost them £8.5 million a year.

Two Labour councillors in Cheshire have resigned, in part over the cuts.  This is not earth shattering, but will be big news locally and will draw attention to Labour’s plans.

One reader who contacted 58 councillors has heard back from some who say they have contacted the local MP.  Our reader has also heard from the MP herself, who says she has been contacted by councillors, after residents raised the issue with them.

There’s more details and a sample email to send to councillors here.

Make your MP aware of these reports

There are an awful lot of facts and figures washing about at the moment.  But sometimes knowing who objects to a measure can be as important as why they object.  So, please make sure you local MP knows about these reports – you can copy and paste this information if you wish:

Citizens Advice (CA) literally works for the DWP, having had over £20 million from them to run the Help To Claim service. But it hasn’t stopped CA publishing Pathways To Poverty, a searing report on the cuts, which begins:  “By refusing to properly consult on its plan to cut billions from disability benefits, the government is choosing not to ask questions it doesn’t want the answers to. The cuts will have a devastating impact on disabled people (and their children), sending hundreds of thousands into poverty, and many more into deeper poverty.”

Money saving expert Martin Lewis is probably the most trusted figure in the UK when it comes to financial issues.  So, when his charity produces a report on the planned reforms headed “Lead shoes instead of a life ring”,  and says “We strongly urge the government to ditch these plans, which will cause misery and hardship for some of the most vulnerable people in society” you can be sure people will listen.

The Commons All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Poverty and Inequality is hugely dominated by Labour MPs.  Yet it has condemned the “sweeping cuts” in a report that argues thatThese proposals won’t remove barriers to employment—they will add new ones by stripping people of the income they rely on to survive. “

The Commons work and pensions committee also has a Labour majority, yet their interim report asks for any changes to be delayed and warns that the proposals: “might not incentivise work, as the Government hopes, but rather push people deeper into poverty, worsen health, especially in more deprived areas, and move people further from the labour market, as evidence suggests has happened in the past with similar reforms.” 

And then there’s the DWP’s own opinion about its chances of moving disabled people into work. At 4pm on Friday 2 May 2025, on the eve of a bank holiday and on a day when the news was dominated by the results of the local elections, the DWP quietly buried two reports.

In “The Experience of Additional Work Coach Support” the DWP found that more time with a work coach improved mental well being for claimants with mental health issues, but had no effect where physical health conditions were concerned and that “Feeling meaningfully closer to work was an outcome for only a minority of those interviewed.”

 “Evaluation of the Employment and Health Discussion” found that employment and health discussions make claimant’s briefly feel more positive, but the solutions they produce don’t work and fail to address may of the barriers to work that disabled claimants actually face.  Yet the Green Paper argues that claimants will benefit from “a new support conversation” which will “enable people to get help early, providing access to more rapid and timely support.”

When so many respected organisations cast doubt on the Green Paper proposals, surely it’s time to pause the plans and carry out more research and consultation.

Don’t be fooled

Most importantly of all, don’t listen to Labour claims that the rebellion has collapsed, that’s just them trying to make their own backbenchers feel isolated and scared.  Instead, keep encouraging claimants to contact their MPs and also offer your own words of support to those MPs brave enough to openly declare they will not vote for Labour’s cuts.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/17/government-officials-brace-for-labour-mps-rebelling-against-welfare-bill

    They still don’t get it

    The ‘morality’ argument is so much more offensive reason for these cuts over saving money (which is understandable to an extent and they would of gotten away with it if they just froze pip for 2-3yrs but they cut far too deep)

    It’s a personal opinion only but every mp who argues these cuts are the moral thing to do should be deseated and banned from ever running for mp again as these morality definition quotes have been so painful (bought up to value morality and fairness)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    I can recall Keir Starmer stated that it will take TEN YEARS to sort out this country- I can’t see him doing this job in FIVE YEARS time and he’s going to make this country more and more expensive to live by or even survive as vulnerable person in today’s society.

    Yet, this stray government wants to save FIVE BILLION in the welfare benefits system and already they have made a U- turn on some but not all in the pensioners winter fuel allowances, and I gather that’s 25% of the alleged TWENTY BILLION black hole they supposedly have not known when they came into power.

    I suggest the super rich of this country are doing fine and IF they were taxed 1% that’s ONE PERCENT TAX RISE to the super richest of this country- and believe ME they had it so good for decades and it’s time NOW that the super wealthy should pay, because 1% would solve the 20 billion black hole and the best thing about this is - that the super rich will hardly, hardly will feel their noses have been scratched and if this was done in a fair and constructive way it will get this not so great country back on track.

    My clear message to the rebels in Parliament is to keep fighting for us, you are our shining light of hope and despair to make a huge change in a direction for a fairness esteem for the people who are standing up to this Government’s thoughtless idea of attacking the vulnerable in today’s society.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    From the big issue 

    MPs will vote on the package of measures in the coming weeks, with far more than were willing to be photographed on Tuesday morning expected to vote against the government.

    If only a small amount were voting against it would say nobody knows the number but it could be high .only 15mps were willing to be photographed  by big issue so the rest want to be hidden  till the vote .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    The media keep making up numbers rebelling it's going to be alot think government told them to play it down so that people get tricked don't fall for it .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Hi all I have not been on hear for a while I just needed a break from all this cruel and insane welfare reform papers and wow did I need it . Been looking at government stats on how many people could lose pip. Just wondered if their stats include 750000  of working age still on DLA has transfer to pip has been halted till 2028 so if you include dla to pip losing out has well that will even be more people losing out so the government might be keeping this really close to their chests so mps don’t hear about this so more rebels will force a halt to tue reform papers this is only my opinion thank you for reading my case 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Every year for the last four years, I've published a small volume of Christmas ghost stories.  If the cuts go through I'll bring A Christmas Carol up to date with Liz Kendall as Scrooge!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Yesterday, when I was crying with terror and misery and hopelessness at the prospect of losing my family’s home again because we will not be able to pay our rent after these changes take effect, I used the link from ‘contact Keir Starmer’, and sent an email to the Downing Street email address saying truthfully that I intend to kill myself, because I can’t go through this ordeal again and can’t see any way round it. Both my children suffer from the same genetic problem as me and one has no income at all because they were rejected by pip. We all live on state pension and pension credit and we will not survive. We are already struggling miserably.
    Today a young person actually rang from the dwp to speak to me about my email. I don’t think they will be able to help, but I did think they would just laugh at it. Maybe if a lot of people wrote in to say they have no hope of surviving this, it might at least give some idea of how many hundreds of thousands of lives will be destroyed.
    Love to you all.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    I have started with another series of posts on X, each one targeting 50 different Labour MPs.  The text is the same for each (I can only tog 50 people in one post), but I have varied the news headlines about the cuts that I have added as images.  I'll do the second half of the list tomorrow. 

    Every Labour MP is being tagged in one of these posts. How many of you will have the decency to reply to this post?
     
    So, #LabourMPs, the time is approaching. Thank you to those already planning to vote against the #disabilitybenefits cuts. Please don't waver in your support. We NEED you.
     
    To the rest of you: why do think cutting people's income by £900 is a good idea? Your own Commons Library Research Briefing states that only 4000-7000 disabled people will find a job through these changes - changes that are affecting 1,000,000 people. How can you have that on your conscience? How do you think people will survive with no chance of clawing that loss of £8000+ a year back, and certainly no fitter for work just because you've cut our lifeline.  

    How will you sleep at night when people start dying?  

    #disability #benefits #PIP #benefitcuts #TakingThePIP #WelfareNotWarfare 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    This article this evening made my heart sink, but the following paragraphs are reasons to hope. I guess we’ll find out more tomorrow…

    Government insiders admitted, however, that deep unease about the disability benefit cuts across the party meant there was no single leader of the group of rebel MPs, so it was difficult to predict the likely scale of any parliamentary mutiny.

    Neil Duncan-Jordan, a Labour MP who has opposed the welfare reform plans, said: “The government will only withdraw its damaging disability benefit cuts if Labour MPs make clear they will vote against them.’


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/17/government-officials-brace-for-labour-mps-rebelling-against-welfare-bill
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @tintack And the sheer arrogance of ‘the money is already spent’. The total presumption that they will get the votes 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Gingin
      I assumed they meant 50 who would actually vote against, which might be credible, but no, they're talking about 50 as the total of votes against and abstentions. I find that very hard to believe. 

      You have to love this bit:

      "Nevertheless, the government is not expected to make any further changes to the welfare bill after it is published. “The £5bn is already spent,” said one senior government source. “Any further tweaks to the bill including on start dates or on criteria or tapering would mean that we start to spend money we don’t have. And this goes far beyond welfare."

      If the money is already spent then that's the government's fault. Spending money from cuts before even knowing if the Commons will vote them through or not is a textbook example of "spending money we don't have".

      I'm genuinely not sure if these people are thick, evil or both. I'm leaning towards both.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    "Most importantly of all, don’t listen to Labour claims that the rebellion has collapsed, that’s just them trying to make their own backbenchers feel isolated and scared."

    Speaking of which, look at this fine example of propaganda:


    At the beginning of the article:

    "Government officials have admitted they made a mistake by making the financial case for cutting benefits as they steel themselves for as many as 50 Labour MPs rebelling against the welfare bill that is being published on Wednesday."

    Near the end of the article:

    "Government insiders admitted, however, that deep unease about the disability benefit cuts across the party meant there was no single leader of the group of rebel MPs, so it was difficult to predict the likely scale of any parliamentary mutiny."

    How odd. How can they be "steeling themselves" for "as many as 50" if it is "difficult to predict the likely scale of any parliamentary mutiny"?

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Gingin Frankly, I would have hoped for better than this from the Guardian. The two passages I quoted are so obviously contradictory that it's hard to believe someone there didn't read it and think "hang on a minute.......". Still, as you say, no time for despair. This may well be a long, attritional war, but we have far more to lose than them, so we have to win it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @tintack It's all very messy, isn't it?  Partly through the inevitable jitters that some MPs will have - especially the newer ones who have never rebelled before.  And partly through the continued poor reporting.  

      B&W is correct in saying that we shouldn't take too much of a notice of numbers that come from the govt.   In many respects, it's a bit like taking Putin's words at face value when he's on Russian TV.  Those words, that sabre-rattling is for the sole purpose of trying to show him as a strong leader in his own country.  The same is happening (we hope) with reports lately from Starmer & Co - trying to steady the ship or make others feel isolated.  But with both Putin and Starmer, the media seem intent in not contextualising what they are reporting. 

      All of that said, there was a photo outside of the Commons today of some of the rebelling MPs, and the most amount they could muster was 15.   That's not a good sign.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @tintack Tintack Thanks for reminding me that the is is propaganda- I hopped onto the emotional rollercoaster for a minute there. No time for complacency OR despair
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Thank you very much for taking the time to write to me about Scope’s cost of living drop-in event. I appreciate you highlighting the significant extra costs faced by disabled people and the importance of ensuring disability benefits are protected.

    I’m pleased to report back that I attended the Scope drop-in on the 2nd April. I’m glad I got to hear directly from disabled people about the financial challenges they face. I found it a powerful reminder of how vital it is that we ensure people get the support they need to live with dignity.

    As a Liberal Democrat MP, I share your concerns about the current system. Proposed changes to disability benefits are already causing significant anxiety among people who rely on this support. Disabled people no longer receive sufficient financial help to cover the additional costs they face. We have also called on the Government to immediately reject the idea of replacing PIP payments with vouchers and grants, ensuring that disabled individuals retain control over their finances.

    The transition from Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) introduced many barriers to accessing support. Please be reassured that Liberal Democrats will continue to raise these issues in Parliament and push for a benefits system that treats disabled people with fairness and dignity. The Liberal Democrats have a highly detailed plan around social care and benefits, and for people living with disability, this is no exception.

    Kind regards,

    Will Forster MP
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    It's baffling that the labour top brass are doubling down on the reforms in the face of such widespread opposition. I don't know what to make of it. I suppose we'll just have to wait until the bill is presented, and we'll have to make sure there's no funny business trying to sneak something past us. Meanwhile, keep adding to the protests!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @robbie It either means they're stupid, that they know the rebellion will falter, or they're playing at game of "who blinks first."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Not all MPs went public about voting against cuts .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    @Dr_Bekka_UK on twitter has just posted the private eye articles I was telling you about earlier
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    I don’t think many MPs get that much of the disabled community view the green paper bill (alongside the assisted dying bill - which still makes no sense why Labour chose to have these 2 vital votes so close together) as basically life or death. 

    That to not fight it is to accept one’s personal end is nye 

    Labour MPs are worried about losing the whip or being deselected or never getting a promotion to minister but those stakes are non-existent when compared to the dire ones facing our community 

    This vote is only the end of chapter 1 (of a very long book series)

    I know it’s tough but it’s time to turn this campaigning (one mp seeing the light at a time) to overdrive for the next 3 weeks

    Recoup over summer recess (as MPs won’t read their emails) as the fight will continue in September regardless of how the vote swings 3rd July as Kendall and co will try again with different cuts before that nov 2025 deadline to get legislation passed in time for the 2026/27 tax year

    Once again it’s a marathon not a sprint
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @D
      "Once again it’s a marathon not a sprint"

      Definitely. Apparently changes like scrapping the WCA won't be voted on until later in the year when the White Paper is published. Hopefully the detailed impact assessments will be available by then. Even if they get their way on July 3rd - and let's hope to god they don't - there will still be opportunities to scupper this. But the pressure needs to be kept up relentlessly. This is likely to be a war of attrition.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    The government don't like it up am as corporal Jones said in dad's army.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Does anyone here live in the Islington South and Finsbury constituency and have Emily Thornberry as their MP? On the Politics Live BBC Sounds episode from yesterday (16th) she seemed to have a misunderstanding of PIP that needs to be corrected, although she expressed concerns about the planned cuts. She said that PIP is meant for getting people into work but that some people are using it to pay their rent, which isn’t fair. She needs to be informed that PIP is to allow people to live independently, and this might be to help them to get to work but it might be for other needs. It’s for the extra expenses associated with disability and housing associated needs might be one of these. If anyone who is in her constituency could email her, that would be great. She is sympathetic to opposition to the cuts, so bear this in mind. Remember to include your address so she knows you’re her constituent. Her email is thornberrye@parliament.uk
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Michael The pip contribution to the rent is what has enabled us to stay together as a family. We have a rent shortfall of 350 pounds a month from inadequate housing benefit. I thought that being able to survive independently in the community was the whole point of pip.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Gingin That is astonishing. I quite like Emily Thornberry but that is on the level of Anne Widdecombe saying benefit sanctions would not apply to the portion of benefits payment meant for children!
      How does she think the economics of poverty work in families?
      Sorry, mum still has food money owing to her so we won’t pay the rent? No, mum doesn’t eat.
      They are all very wealthy people which is why they can rip essential support away from poor families without even understanding how their struggle to survive even works.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Gingin And the fact that housing benefit (due to years of freezes) doesnt cover anything like the full rent of a provate rental. Out of work benefits, even with the disability element, simply isn't enough to cover the difference plus food and bills and extra requirements because we are disabled. So we have NO CHOUCE but to dip into PIP to cover the short fall in rent.

      That needs stressing unequivocally.

      Does this woman think benefits make us wealthy!? Uneducated moron with zero clue about the real world. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Politics Live yesterday (16.6.25) on BBC Sounds at around 36.5 mins Emily Thornberry, a Conservative and a Lib Dem MP all saying they are against or have big concerns about the cuts. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    The Government are under tremendous pressure at the moment with the implications of the grooming Gangs enquiry, this gives backbenchers and those MPs against the cuts so much leeway and power to put pressure on the Government not to go into another Scandal, which it obviously will be once the repercussions begin to bite.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Manny I hope so because the wayt they are going they seem to want to put us in such a negative light that would encourage abuse . 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact