× Members

PIP review

More
5 years 4 months ago #241557 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic PIP review
Remix

I assume you have rung the DWP as you refer to a Case Manager. The DWP is not responsible for the initial decision on whether a Paper Based Assessment can be done this lies solely with the Assessment Provider.

So, you need to speak to IAS (formerly ATOS) if that is the AP for your postcode, not the DWP.

Capita
capita-pip.co.uk/en/contact.html

IAS (formerly ATOS)
www.mypipassessment.co.uk/contact-us/

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 4 months ago #241560 by Remix
Replied by Remix on topic PIP review
Thanks Gordon. I thought with a review, the decision maker could make a decision on paper before it goes to AP. This is what seemed to be happening until I got the call back.

Can you tell me if the outcomes are significantly % worse for a paper assessment with an AP vs face to face?

I realise it's dependent on the case.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 4 months ago #241561 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic PIP review
Remix

Whilst there are clearly exceptions, a PBR is more likely to result in an award than where a face to face is done, however, there is a risk of a lower award with a PBR than a face to face.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: LOLA37

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 4 months ago #241582 by Remix
Replied by Remix on topic PIP review
Sorry to go on...

My understanding was the decision maker makes the decision! They look at the evidence in your case. An assessor can be involved, but it is not always necessary, but even if they are, the decision maker makes the final decision.

I've provided a mountain of evidence from professionals with experience that is relevant to my condition. I'm confident that all the descriptors (apart from moving about perhaps*) can be addressed by a layperson from this evidence and my answers.

So (from my view) getting an AP involved equates to acquiring evidence from a person with vastly less relevant experience and qualification to judge, than those who have already supplied evidence. (Unless they've started appointing internationally recognised clinical psychologists as HPs?) At my Tribunal the DWP decision based on a therapists opinion was overturned by a judge and two doctors based on "the weight of evidence" I had provided in the first place! This is without any involvement from myself. Since Aspergers is lifelong and is the cause of my issues surely the Tribunal outcome therefore cannot simply be ignored and superceded by a HP who supplants concrete evidence with 'casual observation'?

*The moving about descriptor is perhaps the issue, but the case manager wouldn't tell me why he had changed his mind about making a paper decision. I strongly believe I qualify for points for moving around, but to not to put too fine a point on it, I'm having suicidal ideation, and I'm not sure at the moment, but I might rather make sacrifices than be sacrificed. I am speaking to a manager about this next week. I hope and pray it's not too late, and something can be done to avoid F2F..

I am so sorry to go on, because of my Aspergesr I ruminate constnalty about everything and I can feel the depression taking hold.

Thank you for your tireless support.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 4 months ago #241586 by Gary
Replied by Gary on topic PIP review
Hi Remix

The Going Out activity looks at three things.

Planning a route - this is primarily a cognitive or sensory (e.g. blindness) activity. You are being asked about the problems you would have with working out how to get from one place to another, you do not need to be able to follow the route that you are planning.

Undertaking a Journey - this is to do with mental health issues such as agoraphobia and social anxiety and is concerned with you leaving the house to go somewhere, they will be interested in the things that stop you doing this. You need to show that you would suffer "overwhelming psychological distress" to meet the criteria.

Following a route - This activity about the problems you would have navigating a route. So are there problems; cognitive, sensory or mental health issues that would prevent you from doing this? This is different from undertaking a journey, in fact, if you cannot undertake a journey then you will not score points for following one and vice versa.

Gary

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Remix

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 4 months ago #241611 by Remix
Replied by Remix on topic PIP review
Hi Gary,

I understand very well what the Going Out and Moving About activities are about. I've given volumes of evidence, including statements from my GP, support worker, more of the sam on my previous PIP and consultant letters, documentation confirming/corroborating everything, and I pleaded for a paper assessment to avoid harm to myself from a F2F.

The problem is the CM phoned and after a cordial few questions told me had enough information to make a decision, then phoned back later and abruptly said "I'm not medically trained" and I'd have to have a F2F. I pleaded for the CM to contact my GP, psychologist, support worker, ask me any question, do ANYTHING. He just went right ahead and said he would contact the AP immediately. Toward the end of this conversation, it became apparent that he hadn't read the support letter from my GP.

It might be I'd rather he put a 0 for the tick box he was struggling with so I can move on with my life, even if it's wrong and I clearly do qualify. I am having some very dark thoughts right now.

Is there any avenue left for me? I have a manager contacting me. I'm going to ask if they can get somebody different to look at my case, if the manager will discuss the problem descriptors with me, if a complaint would help these objectives... but I fear the person has forwarded stuff to the AP. I believe I'm on the vulnerable persons register.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.